Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How would DU react to the 1930s and Hitler? [View all]get the red out
(13,468 posts)113. Thank you
I agree. I don't even bother to open a lot of threads these days.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
283 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Translation: I can't counter the merits of you entire post, so I will try to mock it.
joeglow3
Sep 2014
#170
Bernard Sanders (I-VT) - "There is no question that ISIS is a dangerous and brutal organization,"
FrodosPet
Sep 2014
#97
“Harder than anything we’ve tried to do thus far in Iraq or Afghanistan” is how one U.S. general
Hissyspit
Sep 2014
#198
How did DU react to the Bush gang's 'terror' claims? You don't have to go back to Hitler
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#33
I see you here too. I don't take orders from anonymous, strangers on the internet. As I was saying
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#169
It goes to show what an upstanding DU member so are when they make statements like that
davidpdx
Sep 2014
#159
The president as well as others have pointed out that our enemies are no longer nations
davidpdx
Sep 2014
#157
Hitler started out as one crazy man, before he got a country's government behind him.
pnwmom
Sep 2014
#174
most of my posts against hitler and what i suggest we should do would be hidden
samsingh
Sep 2014
#6
First, they complain about a speech before it's made, then about a war that hasn't begun.
NYC_SKP
Sep 2014
#9
Reading comprehension is often lacking. I read what DI said and agreed, but others
RKP5637
Sep 2014
#130
ISIS isn't the military powerhouse that Germany was. ISIS can field about 20,000 fighters whereas
neverforget
Sep 2014
#10
Neither was al-Qaeda and yet, they managed to give us the most devastating attack on American soil.
Drunken Irishman
Sep 2014
#11
And look where that got us? A war in Afghanistan that we are still fighting, Al Qaeda still exists
neverforget
Sep 2014
#15
It was Saudis who launched that attack, and it only succeeded because the normal precautions
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#36
Next time I'll put on a tin foil hat and go down the conspiracy rabbit hole just for you
krawhitham
Sep 2014
#272
And Hitler took over a country with a willing populace, vast resources and a military that was
neverforget
Sep 2014
#28
Iran doesn't have nukes. They have nuclear reactors but no nukes and Iran wants nothing to do
neverforget
Sep 2014
#62
so we continue to do what we've been doing and expect a different result? it makes no sense
neverforget
Sep 2014
#243
I disagree with Iran supplying nukes to a group that hates them. The reason we are in Afghanistan is
freshwest
Sep 2014
#73
I didn't intend to suggest that Iran would ally themselves with ISIS/ISIL.
OilemFirchen
Sep 2014
#75
I have to add, that I agree with you, but that Iran has a powerful backer: Russia.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#98
Let's hope so, fresh.. ‘Apocalyptic’ Isis beyond anything we've seen, say US defence chiefs .. "
Cha
Sep 2014
#107
What I find most concerning is the speed and acceptance. As you said, "They want a new home
RKP5637
Sep 2014
#136
It's only a delusion if it doesn't come to pass. The caliphate is a tangible vision..
freshwest
Sep 2014
#227
So you supported the Bush Doctrine then? Don't know if you noticed, but apparently it has
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#39
Once upon a time the Nazis were just a bunch of blowhards and malcontents
Nuclear Unicorn
Sep 2014
#116
You're right, this hole isn't nearly deep enough and we should keep digging. Great plan. nt
LeftyMom
Sep 2014
#206
So you too supported the Bush Doctrine?? And here I thought DU was opposed to
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#43
That depends. In this scenario, would our nation be arming the Germans?
SolutionisSolidarity
Sep 2014
#21
Just as there was zero credible al-Qaeda was a threat to the US, right?
Drunken Irishman
Sep 2014
#50
I fear that some are making believe they live in Luxembourg or some tiny place...
NYC_SKP
Sep 2014
#29
I know, right? Some here were even against us getting rid of Saddam! Maybe they love dictators and
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#30
I remember, those who opposed that illegal invasion were Saddam Lovers. Just saw
sabrina 1
Sep 2014
#46
Yep. People here are saying the same thing that Bush and his lackeys were saying in '03.
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#124
Perhaps if you can see why "ISIS" is not like Hitler you can also see how silly it is to compare
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#180
More like parallels to the rhetoric that got us into Iraq. No, not parallels; the same arguments.
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#189
Eh, nice nonsequitur. You and the OP made the analogy; no one accused Obama of making it. N/T
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#200
Wha…? That statement says nothing about Obama. You and the OP are made the analogy, and that’s what
Chathamization
Sep 2014
#215
Saudi Arabia needs to step up and take care of their affairs. The rest of us can only lament.
mia
Sep 2014
#38
After reading this, all I can say is that it might be time for you to become "Sober Irishman". n/t
BlueStater
Sep 2014
#41
FDR's fireside chats arguing for lend-lease would have been met with mockery and disgust
Nye Bevan
Sep 2014
#48
Most Americans held that view until Pearl Harbor, then WTC. Excellent rant, though.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#59
power corrupts, I think that's the nature of humanity. I agree with you & President Obama,
Sunlei
Sep 2014
#65
In January 1938 he could have. Hitler had not yet 'reunited' the ethnic Germans in Austria and
pampango
Sep 2014
#172
Ermächtigungsgesetz (1933), Dachau (1933), Nuremburg Laws (1935), Saarland (1935),
rug
Sep 2014
#188
Our involvement in World War I ultimately led to his rise a few years later.
Drunken Irishman
Sep 2014
#115
no surprise from me. Looking at all the "Obama is a war monger" threads, I wouldn't expect anything
still_one
Sep 2014
#101
Hitler and the Nazi regime was unique in all human history committing industrial scale genocide.
gordianot
Sep 2014
#96
There have actually been quite a few in the history of man. You also left out China and the
still_one
Sep 2014
#100
The list in the 20th century is almost endless but Nazi Germany is still unique for all time.
gordianot
Sep 2014
#143
How did DU react when Obama ordered the seals to illegally enter Pakistan and eliminate bin laden?
still_one
Sep 2014
#102
Not well. Some were appalled. Some were jubiliant. The first group hated on the second.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#112
Well said. The OP and most responses have focused on ISIS and what the US should and shouldn't do
pampango
Sep 2014
#120
You forgot the first rule of analogies. First one to make a Hitler comparison, loses the argument
NightWatcher
Sep 2014
#179
If we had funded, and continued to find Hiltler in the first place, we'd suggest prosecuting those
grahamhgreen
Sep 2014
#185
Many DUers would throw Roosevelt under the bus and say it was all his fault.
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#186
Right, the same DUers who are all over DU saying the war on ISIS is the same as the 2003 Iraq war
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#192
Sure sign of someone losing an argument is when a ROFL is used instead of actually making one.
Dawgs
Sep 2014
#271
Exactly! And they are the same members who have complained about Obama daily.
Major Hogwash
Sep 2014
#252
Well, why don't you explain to me how this trashy Limbaugh-like smear of an OP,
Hissyspit
Sep 2014
#261
Your moral argument is as juvenile and dishonest as it was when Rumsfeld made it.
Marr
Sep 2014
#239