Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to d_r (Reply #115)

Actually, that's Dawkins on fetuses with Down's Syndrome REP Aug 2014 #1
The title is based on this twitter exchange by Richard Dawkins. alp227 Aug 2014 #2
The context is to smear atheists. Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #6
Well it isn't difficult to AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #30
That statement had nothing to do with atheism phil89 Aug 2014 #40
LMAO AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #44
For me it only means not giving a shit. Neoma Aug 2014 #52
So you say it's not possible to have no faith? immoderate Aug 2014 #59
the absence of faith is possible AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #67
Under what banner should we expect to find it then? immoderate Aug 2014 #72
In situations that don't require faith AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #75
Atheism doesn't require faith Marrah_G Aug 2014 #78
And his belief is tempered by faith AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #171
That does not require faith Marrah_G Aug 2014 #178
What situations require faith? Marrah_G Aug 2014 #80
Faith in what? Why do the religious keep trying to force faith on the nonreligious. Luminous Animal Aug 2014 #82
And it requires AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #172
Not believing in the existence of dieties does not require faith Marrah_G Aug 2014 #181
Ok we will just agree to disagree AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #182
Yeah. Just like not believing in Santa Clause requires faith. Luminous Animal Aug 2014 #188
No more and less interesting that hearing someone alternating between... LanternWaste Aug 2014 #203
FAITH?? alp227 Aug 2014 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #99
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #101
This message was self-deleted by its author alp227 Aug 2014 #101
No it doesn't. Iggo Aug 2014 #107
This is an attempt that is always done to bring atheism on par with religion snooper2 Aug 2014 #120
No tricks AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #174
I'm sorry, but that makes no sense to me War Horse Aug 2014 #238
So you require faith to NOT believe in Santa, unicorns, and the power of Thor? Arugula Latte Aug 2014 #136
There is no proof that some type of God does not exist FrodosPet Aug 2014 #179
I would say agnosticism is the former and atheism is the latter ... Arugula Latte Aug 2014 #230
Analyst will never answer that question MattBaggins Aug 2014 #219
That makes no sense Marrah_G Aug 2014 #77
Apparently, their is faith in not having faith. Looking forward to people here making a credible Luminous Animal Aug 2014 #84
I'm sorry you are so bound to your dogma. defacto7 Aug 2014 #89
By that logic, baldness is a hair style n/t eridani Aug 2014 #95
Tell me, where is this dogma written down? Warpy Aug 2014 #97
I'm not an atheist but this attempt to label them as having a religious belief system is silly. stevenleser Aug 2014 #138
I think his point is to say a certain degree of atheism is attended by dogmatism and zeal. nt Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2014 #161
I'll buy the zeal part. Atheism is built on science so, to say it is dogmatic is the opposite of the stevenleser Aug 2014 #162
Atheism is founded on a belief system AnalystInParadise Aug 2014 #173
No, it is not and no it does not. See my #162 above. stevenleser Aug 2014 #200
To be fair though, religion does influence lots of "pro-life" ideology, alp227 Aug 2014 #87
No; it's pure click bait and terrible journalism REP Aug 2014 #7
'people associate secular thought with lack of morality.' Rex Aug 2014 #3
Lying and calling a fetus a baby is oh so moral REP Aug 2014 #9
Well, he changed it to make his distortion more clear in a different way..... Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #12
More click-bait words REP Aug 2014 #16
He's a dick but that's sensible advice. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #4
I'm about as pro-choice as they come, but unless a condition's bad enough to merit hospice care.... moriah Aug 2014 #17
That's an irrational argument Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #18
The poster, and Dawkins, are suggesting it's cruel to have a child with DS instead of aborting .... moriah Aug 2014 #23
It IS cruel to have a child with a lifelong disability... Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #24
So it's better to kill it instead, if you do it early enough? moriah Aug 2014 #27
Not being born is not the same as "killing". Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #28
You're trying to denigrate choice by saying it's cruel for women to choose to have their... moriah Aug 2014 #33
You don't sound very pro-choice. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #34
No, it's still a life. But just because it's a life doesn't mean it's sacrosanct, any more than.... moriah Aug 2014 #37
It isn't a life. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #38
You're the one trying to dance around saying that not all life is sacred. It isn't, and I'm not... moriah Aug 2014 #41
80% of women who have a Down syndrome pregnancy in the US choose to terminate. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #47
It's their choice. It's not the choice I would make, personally. moriah Aug 2014 #49
There is no way to predict level of physical or intellectual disability through testing for DS REP Aug 2014 #53
More are now that they aren't simply shuttled into institutions. moriah Aug 2014 #65
life doesn't start until the baby can live outside the womb on it's own snooper2 Aug 2014 #122
So women who miscarry and grieve the loss are drama queens. moriah Aug 2014 #154
It's not really my place to say- snooper2 Aug 2014 #156
Yes, a fetus/embryo/zygote dies in an abortion - not a baby, child, or person REP Aug 2014 #39
Back off, I said I never would judge a person for choosing abortion in that case. moriah Aug 2014 #43
I don't see anyone telling anyone to have an abortion. You back off. REP Aug 2014 #50
And I wasn't saying anything against abortion, yet you acted like I was. moriah Aug 2014 #68
DS screening is NOT eugenics pokerfan Aug 2014 #180
That's funny because d_r Aug 2014 #185
I'm not saying it pokerfan Aug 2014 #187
your statement about the term "eugenics" d_r Aug 2014 #189
95% of the time it is random pokerfan Aug 2014 #190
you too nt d_r Aug 2014 #192
You're making the same mistake pro-lifers make, equating screening/diagnosis with a decision, but .. moriah Aug 2014 #191
Choice is choice. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #177
So the people who preach about abortion being murder.... moriah Aug 2014 #198
Correct - they're not trying to denigrate choice itself. They're trying to denigrate Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2014 #199
No one is saying someone has to Marrah_G Aug 2014 #81
And I'm of the opinion that the only opinion that matters is the mother's... moriah Aug 2014 #90
I agree that the only opinion that should matter is the mothers. Marrah_G Aug 2014 #91
I Am Pro Abortion LeftOfWest Aug 2014 #113
So you're pro-telling other women when to have abortions? moriah Aug 2014 #123
i am also pro-abortion for every/any pregnant woman who wants one. Scout Aug 2014 #165
If you think it's an *easy* choice, you've not had one. moriah Aug 2014 #170
apparently you don't read very well. Scout Aug 2014 #205
It's a good thing, then, that Dawkin's opinion doesn't matter. Mariana Aug 2014 #211
Are you pro-choice or not? Hugabear Aug 2014 #128
The point of my question is that the ONLY person who can answer those questions.... moriah Aug 2014 #133
You're the one saying that it's still a life Hugabear Aug 2014 #140
I disagree. It may not be murder, but the fetus still dies. moriah Aug 2014 #148
"to have a child with a lifelong disability" alp227 Aug 2014 #106
so what disabilities are "OK" d_r Aug 2014 #186
that's a really tough one. you have the guy who played Corky from the old show Life Goes On, who is dionysus Aug 2014 #93
Yes, YarnAddict Aug 2014 #183
if people do, and have the adequate means to care for the child, i give them the utmost respect. dionysus Aug 2014 #240
No, you're just categorically saying the disabled shouldn't be born in the first place. sir pball Aug 2014 #142
So, do you think it's moral or ethical to have a child you know will have a chromosomal disorder? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #144
It's not my decision to make that choice for another person. Full stop, end of story. sir pball Aug 2014 #146
It isn't about saving resources, or "useless eaters" Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #147
I'm just asking for a little intellectual honesty - I won't ever agree with your position sir pball Aug 2014 #151
Is eliminating debilitating chromosomal disorders a bad thing, then? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #158
"However I don't see a moral argument for having a child..." Scout Aug 2014 #166
Being fat and being severely disabled with multiple congenital conditions are very different things. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #169
yes i know that. did you think i didn't? did you bother to read what i wrote? n/t Scout Aug 2014 #204
Existential angst and bad television aside, that's irresponsible advice. nt LeftyMom Aug 2014 #29
People routinely abort fetuses shown to have Down Syndrome gollygee Aug 2014 #149
And each case varies widely, which is why the choices are made by the woman... moriah Aug 2014 #152
Well that's just his opinion gollygee Aug 2014 #153
I think it's mainly right to lifers ozone_man Aug 2014 #196
Right, and will take so much of a family's time and resources Warpy Aug 2014 #98
So should parents abort all imperfect fetuses, then? Even very fixable ones, like the heart defects pnwmom Aug 2014 #214
Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #222
As someone with the most common digestive disease associated with Down's -- Celiac disease -- pnwmom Aug 2014 #223
Nobody's pressuring. People are expressing opinions. LeftyMom Aug 2014 #228
Nice try. Babies can not be aborted.....complete distortion...another jury decision... Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #5
OK, edited title. nt alp227 Aug 2014 #8
Sure, much better with a Fox News question mark...now totally unrelated to actual title.... Fred Sanders Aug 2014 #11
yes, a fetus is not a baby. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #60
The facts are LynnTTT Aug 2014 #10
That means that 8% of women ... stone space Aug 2014 #70
Pro-choice is pro-choice. End of story. Hugabear Aug 2014 #13
Exactly. Dawkins in no way suggested Mariana Aug 2014 #213
I think your title is absurd, honestly Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #14
Well, Tay-Sachs is about 100% fatal REP Aug 2014 #19
I don't know of any family that has knowingly brought a child with Tay Sachs into the world Marrah_G Aug 2014 #83
In reply to your edit: No REP Aug 2014 #15
Not to mention the impact it has on family, especially siblings. nt kelliekat44 Aug 2014 #31
No. 951-Riverside Aug 2014 #20
How does he feel about this man who's been physically disabled for 50 years? freshwest Aug 2014 #21
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #26
He's suffered with it for 50 years and is 71. And you are way out of line about RW talking points. freshwest Aug 2014 #51
I doubt very much you know anyone like Stephen Hawking REP Aug 2014 #35
Sorry, but since I go and visit such people and advocate for them, your doubt is wrong. freshwest Aug 2014 #45
There is only one person on earth like Stephen Hawking: Stephen Hawking REP Aug 2014 #57
You are wrong in all that you say about me. freshwest Aug 2014 #62
Thanks for speaking up about this. thucythucy Aug 2014 #73
Thank you very much, thucythucy. Yes it's disappointing to see those would use us for an agenda. freshwest Aug 2014 #76
Dignity. sheshe2 Aug 2014 #88
:) freshwest Aug 2014 #92
kudos! Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #124
We should abort him bigwillq Aug 2014 #46
It beats being bigoted against women who choose to abort LadyHawkAZ Aug 2014 #22
Sounds like he's bigoted against women who choose NOT to abort. Crunchy Frog Aug 2014 #42
Please. Dawkins is *NOT* a philosopher. Jim__ Aug 2014 #25
I wonder what the 1% do? yortsed snacilbuper Aug 2014 #32
He's really kind of a dick overall. n/t Crunchy Frog Aug 2014 #36
People don't associate secular thought with lack of morality because of Dawkins.... MellowDem Aug 2014 #48
"The root problem is religion" yortsed snacilbuper Aug 2014 #55
Sounds more pro-abortion than pro-choice bluestateguy Aug 2014 #54
I think he's wrong only in the sense that it is an individual's choice. alarimer Aug 2014 #56
so you all support abortion rights except if the mother learns that her child would have down's Warren Stupidity Aug 2014 #58
That's what I'm taking from this... immoderate Aug 2014 #63
Women should ALWAYS have the choice, alp227 Aug 2014 #108
Suggesting that abortion should be the only good choice is anti-choice loyalsister Aug 2014 #61
How about *suggesting* that it's the better or best choice of many, from one that seeks an opinion? immoderate Aug 2014 #64
I don't think that is the case here loyalsister Aug 2014 #79
It's not anti-choice to express an opinion Mariana Aug 2014 #109
How are these opinions different? loyalsister Aug 2014 #143
Nope... MellowDem Aug 2014 #193
That's a different discussion loyalsister Aug 2014 #195
Between what two statements? MellowDem Aug 2014 #210
These loyalsister Aug 2014 #216
Opposing something on moral grounds isn't anti-choice... MellowDem Aug 2014 #218
Judging a woman's decisions loyalsister Aug 2014 #221
Well if they think their views should be enforced... MellowDem Aug 2014 #231
Policy positions start with opinions loyalsister Aug 2014 #232
Yes, I think he would disagree... MellowDem Aug 2014 #233
It doesn't change the fact that it is an anti-choice statement loyalsister Aug 2014 #234
It is... MellowDem Aug 2014 #235
We aren't going to agree on this loyalsister Aug 2014 #236
I think in the situation you described... MellowDem Aug 2014 #237
Thank you! Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #125
Just Irish nationalist bs. betterdemsonly Aug 2014 #66
??? Dawkins is not Irish. Nt alp227 Aug 2014 #110
The person he was responding to was betterdemsonly Aug 2014 #114
sounds like the third reich: "beasts in human form" GusBob Aug 2014 #69
It's not Godwin's Law if it's a legitimate issue that relates to the NSDAP. sir pball Aug 2014 #145
Are the women who abort DS fetuses Nazis? Mariana Aug 2014 #215
I'm sorry d_r Aug 2014 #71
Thanks, d_r. You speak for me and those I know. Yes, very valuable. freshwest Aug 2014 #85
Dawkins never advocated eugenics. Iron Man Aug 2014 #96
Yeah I did d_r Aug 2014 #115
Post removed Post removed Aug 2014 #119
It would be immoral d_r Aug 2014 #137
I have no problems if a woman chooses to abort Iron Man Aug 2014 #139
I don't d_r Aug 2014 #141
According to you... MellowDem Aug 2014 #194
got that wrong pal d_r Aug 2014 #197
So all women who abort DS MellowDem Aug 2014 #209
I will try again d_r Aug 2014 #212
No, I understand it perfectly... MellowDem Aug 2014 #217
Again. d_r Aug 2014 #225
Yes you are equating race to a very serious disability. Boudica the Lyoness Aug 2014 #220
no, I didn't compare people with DS to black children d_r Aug 2014 #224
I would abort, with out hesitation, Boudica the Lyoness Aug 2014 #227
please do d_r Aug 2014 #229
it's not just the callousness, it's the attitude that it's a done deal--like a triangle adding up to MisterP Aug 2014 #74
Agreed Puzzledtraveller Aug 2014 #126
"this is why people associate secular thought with lack of morality" -- give me a fucking break! Arugula Latte Aug 2014 #86
Eeyup hifiguy Aug 2014 #160
I don't see anything wrong with what Dawkins said. Iron Man Aug 2014 #94
He said nothing wrong. Mariana Aug 2014 #111
You're absolutely right. Iron Man Aug 2014 #118
"I'd strongly encourage her to abort it." alp227 Aug 2014 #112
I know a kid that is happy every day of his life d_r Aug 2014 #116
It would be a burden on the parents. Iron Man Aug 2014 #121
Holy cow. d_r Aug 2014 #129
Those links aren't going to change my mind on this issue. Iron Man Aug 2014 #130
Then be honest about it YarnAddict Aug 2014 #201
UGH. That bigoted post got kept, thanks to ONE juror. alp227 Aug 2014 #175
for the record d_r Aug 2014 #184
It's not eugenics when it comes to abortion. Iron Man Aug 2014 #117
It is eugenics d_r Aug 2014 #131
The discussion is abortion. Iron Man Aug 2014 #132
The discussion is Down Syndrome d_r Aug 2014 #134
I'm sorry d_r Aug 2014 #135
I just answered another newer thread on this - JustAnotherGen Aug 2014 #127
Someone asked him for his opinion and he gave it gollygee Aug 2014 #150
People should be free to choose get the red out Aug 2014 #155
Wow, a shitload of anti-choice trolls here today, isn't that just peachy! Humanist_Activist Aug 2014 #157
"UGH. this is why people associate secular thought with lack of morality."? Grow up, mr blur Aug 2014 #159
i would probably terminate such a pregnancy. Scout Aug 2014 #163
You typed a question mark instead of a period after the sentence by mistake. KamaAina Aug 2014 #164
I think pro-choice goes both ways... LeftishBrit Aug 2014 #167
I agree with him n/t PasadenaTrudy Aug 2014 #168
And.... Manifestor_of_Light Aug 2014 #176
Creepy thinking bordering on eugenics. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2014 #202
This is the man's personal opinion Bettie Aug 2014 #206
So? Some opinions are reprehensible. alp227 Aug 2014 #207
But to declare that his opinion is the sole reason why religious types Bettie Aug 2014 #208
He should go back to science and forget about social commentary. hrmjustin Aug 2014 #226
I don't know about "immoral" but... pipi_k Aug 2014 #239
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Richard Dawkins: bigoted ...»Reply #119