Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Richard Dawkins: bigoted against those with Down's syndrome? [View all]Response to d_r (Reply #115)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
240 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Faith in what? Why do the religious keep trying to force faith on the nonreligious.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2014
#82
So you require faith to NOT believe in Santa, unicorns, and the power of Thor?
Arugula Latte
Aug 2014
#136
Apparently, their is faith in not having faith. Looking forward to people here making a credible
Luminous Animal
Aug 2014
#84
I'm not an atheist but this attempt to label them as having a religious belief system is silly.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#138
I think his point is to say a certain degree of atheism is attended by dogmatism and zeal. nt
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2014
#161
I'll buy the zeal part. Atheism is built on science so, to say it is dogmatic is the opposite of the
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#162
Well, he changed it to make his distortion more clear in a different way.....
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#12
I'm about as pro-choice as they come, but unless a condition's bad enough to merit hospice care....
moriah
Aug 2014
#17
The poster, and Dawkins, are suggesting it's cruel to have a child with DS instead of aborting ....
moriah
Aug 2014
#23
You're trying to denigrate choice by saying it's cruel for women to choose to have their...
moriah
Aug 2014
#33
No, it's still a life. But just because it's a life doesn't mean it's sacrosanct, any more than....
moriah
Aug 2014
#37
You're the one trying to dance around saying that not all life is sacred. It isn't, and I'm not...
moriah
Aug 2014
#41
80% of women who have a Down syndrome pregnancy in the US choose to terminate.
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2014
#47
There is no way to predict level of physical or intellectual disability through testing for DS
REP
Aug 2014
#53
Back off, I said I never would judge a person for choosing abortion in that case.
moriah
Aug 2014
#43
You're making the same mistake pro-lifers make, equating screening/diagnosis with a decision, but ..
moriah
Aug 2014
#191
Correct - they're not trying to denigrate choice itself. They're trying to denigrate
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Aug 2014
#199
The point of my question is that the ONLY person who can answer those questions....
moriah
Aug 2014
#133
that's a really tough one. you have the guy who played Corky from the old show Life Goes On, who is
dionysus
Aug 2014
#93
if people do, and have the adequate means to care for the child, i give them the utmost respect.
dionysus
Aug 2014
#240
No, you're just categorically saying the disabled shouldn't be born in the first place.
sir pball
Aug 2014
#142
So, do you think it's moral or ethical to have a child you know will have a chromosomal disorder?
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2014
#144
It's not my decision to make that choice for another person. Full stop, end of story.
sir pball
Aug 2014
#146
I'm just asking for a little intellectual honesty - I won't ever agree with your position
sir pball
Aug 2014
#151
Being fat and being severely disabled with multiple congenital conditions are very different things.
Spider Jerusalem
Aug 2014
#169
yes i know that. did you think i didn't? did you bother to read what i wrote? n/t
Scout
Aug 2014
#204
So should parents abort all imperfect fetuses, then? Even very fixable ones, like the heart defects
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#214
As someone with the most common digestive disease associated with Down's -- Celiac disease --
pnwmom
Aug 2014
#223
Nice try. Babies can not be aborted.....complete distortion...another jury decision...
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#5
Sure, much better with a Fox News question mark...now totally unrelated to actual title....
Fred Sanders
Aug 2014
#11
I don't know of any family that has knowingly brought a child with Tay Sachs into the world
Marrah_G
Aug 2014
#83
He's suffered with it for 50 years and is 71. And you are way out of line about RW talking points.
freshwest
Aug 2014
#51
Sorry, but since I go and visit such people and advocate for them, your doubt is wrong.
freshwest
Aug 2014
#45
Thank you very much, thucythucy. Yes it's disappointing to see those would use us for an agenda.
freshwest
Aug 2014
#76
People don't associate secular thought with lack of morality because of Dawkins....
MellowDem
Aug 2014
#48
so you all support abortion rights except if the mother learns that her child would have down's
Warren Stupidity
Aug 2014
#58
How about *suggesting* that it's the better or best choice of many, from one that seeks an opinion?
immoderate
Aug 2014
#64
it's not just the callousness, it's the attitude that it's a done deal--like a triangle adding up to
MisterP
Aug 2014
#74
"this is why people associate secular thought with lack of morality" -- give me a fucking break!
Arugula Latte
Aug 2014
#86
Wow, a shitload of anti-choice trolls here today, isn't that just peachy!
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2014
#157
"UGH. this is why people associate secular thought with lack of morality."? Grow up,
mr blur
Aug 2014
#159