General Discussion

redqueen

(115,103 posts)

464. All you've shown is that he used the words. Do you now want to claim context doesn't matter?

Fri Jun 20, 2014, 11:06 AM

Jun 2014

Find an instance when he makes racist remarks about a right wing minority. When he uses racist insults about them or uses racist stereotypes.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

478 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Really?! So now even the Rude Pundit is thrown under the bus by DUers? [View all] riderinthestorm Jun 2014 OP

Well, if you're going to have a rule against 'rude' posts.... Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #1

"Rude" doesn't mean "rude to the evil Bush Cabal," fergawdsake. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #199

Boo. JaneyVee Jun 2014 #2

Says it all. QuestForSense Jun 2014 #402

Apparently the post was hidden by only one necessary juror vote to hide, Hissyspit Jun 2014 #444

A thread which expresses the hope that a woman should suck a "syphilitic dick" Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #3

Where did you get 'syphilitic', other than your own mind? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #8

Here: Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #11

Ah, then you should alert on that comment. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #12

Uh... the thread is still there, hence you can reference it. It is only the OP that is gone. salib Jun 2014 #128

Correct, but a GD thread that nobody can reply to sinks very quickly (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #130

Yes. It does sink quickly, bvar22 Jun 2014 #235

Me too. blackspade Jun 2014 #286

Another rec from me. It's really bad when the Rude One is no longer acceptable on DU. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #370

+1 nomorenomore08 Jun 2014 #391

I agree dflprincess Jun 2014 #412

I am offended by war criminals. Everything else takes second place to that. I see someone slamming sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #416

oh good grief. alert on that particular responce not the original thread. Javaman Jun 2014 #184

I was not the alerter (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #206

Okay, my bad. Javaman Jun 2014 #223

Really, duh! Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #210

On June 8th, I juried one of your posts. Here was my comment to Leave It Alone: TheBlackAdder Jun 2014 #212

Whether or not I agree that Jesus was the most influential person ever, I totally agree that that is DesertDiamond Jun 2014 #362

I bet the rude one is... lame54 Jun 2014 #131

Is your addition of the word 'syphillitic' an expression of the honesty that comes from having Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #13

Nope, I was referring to this reply in the thread: Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #21

Then you should have alerted on that reply instead. Iggo Jun 2014 #68

I was not the alerter on the OP (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #103

That's a comment in the thread Gore1FL Jun 2014 #69

By "the thread" I mean the thread as a whole, not just the OP. (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #106

Fair point Gore1FL Jun 2014 #237

I'll add my voice here. You're wrong. You should acknowledge it. Demit Jun 2014 #84

By "thread" I meant the whole thread, not the OP in isolation. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #109

And yet you failed to say so and laid the blame on the OP. The word is 'dishonest'. Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #120

I used the word "thread" rather than "OP" for a reason. Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #126

So sorry your delicate sensitivities were offended hueymahl Jun 2014 #92

I was not the alerter, nor a juror (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #101

Did not see that...HMMM doxydad Jun 2014 #179

Oh, please. It wasn't written by a DU member. But you knew that. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #201

The "syphilitic" commentary was (nt) Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #209

Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #335

Not surprised. BlueStater Jun 2014 #4

I agree underpants Jun 2014 #7

yes, it's becoming more like Ladies Home Journal 2pooped2pop Jun 2014 #53

yeah, what's the point in hiding anyway? grasswire Jun 2014 #175

+1000 Javaman Jun 2014 #189

"hidden posts do nothing more than attract more eyeballs" HubertHeaver Jun 2014 #408

it is indeed a double edged situation. nt Javaman Jun 2014 #458

This Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2014 #236

Yep, I always do, too. nt awoke_in_2003 Jun 2014 #373

Exactly... sendero Jun 2014 #328

Bravo! silvershadow Jun 2014 #414

The Corporate Media doesn't get hidden though. That is considered 'credible' by the same small sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #372

Spot on, they are exactly like the republicans. Exultant Democracy Jun 2014 #379

lol Love it. ctsnowman Jun 2014 #450

Saw "dick" & "viscous goo," thought it was an anti-gun thread... Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #80

Bullshit. Paladin Jun 2014 #5

Tom Tomorrow has been banned??? !!!! 2banon Jun 2014 #190

is that true? grasswire Jun 2014 #257

No hosts locked one of his "gun" cartoons. Hassin Bin Sober Jun 2014 #288

thanks.. interesting. strange, twisted logic prevailing in certain quarters. 2banon Jun 2014 #290

it remains a monument to host perfidiousness. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #367

Saw that. Lame alert, lame jury. Scuba Jun 2014 #6

Agreed. First nipple alerts and now "Don't be rude to the Cheneys" alerts. FSogol Jun 2014 #10

People are reading DU at work jberryhill Jun 2014 #158

Should be people be reading DU at work? caraher Jun 2014 #166

Yup: "I wasn't doing my job and it's all DU's fault! Damn those nipples! Damn those Cheneys!" FSogol Jun 2014 #176

I often read DU at work. It helps to relieve the boredom. totodeinhere Jun 2014 #473

maybe those people shouldn't display rude pundit threads then.. grasswire Jun 2014 #183

Good grief, it's a little hard to believe anyone could think that a reasonable argument! Dark n Stormy Knight Jun 2014 #218

Ah, but then the poster would have to use some acronym which escapes me at the moment arikara Jun 2014 #293

Not my circus, not my monkeys lapislzi Jun 2014 #191

Here, here!!! Blus4u Jun 2014 #266

Yeah. I've been here a decade. I swear I don't ever Hissyspit Jun 2014 #360

Wow Caretha Jun 2014 #394

It helps to be self employed jberryhill Jun 2014 #469

u just pulled that out of your ass. mopinko Jun 2014 #424

As I've said--and I've gotten excoriated for saying it--it's called "Trolling from the left." MADem Jun 2014 #200

Very true. n/t FSogol Jun 2014 #211

I bet if Alerters had to include their name...a lot of frivolous alerts would stop. Old and In the Way Jun 2014 #272

I'm not so sure they could be shamed. pacalo Jun 2014 #434

Agreed. Alerters should not be anonymous. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #476

One of our most reliably progressive voices... squashed here riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #22

this place has become most reliably unprogressive.. frylock Jun 2014 #296

or determined neo-liberals. countryjake Jun 2014 #313

X 1000 ctsnowman Jun 2014 #451

I agree; do you have the alert and results? nt RiffRandell Jun 2014 #156

Sorry, no. Scuba Jun 2014 #164

Unbelievable leftynyc Jun 2014 #9

Alerting!!!!! sharp_stick Jun 2014 #28

The Old Golf Pants. . . ProfessorGAC Jun 2014 #38

LOL - that's why I used knickers leftynyc Jun 2014 #81

Not all Tools! FSogol Jun 2014 #180

Here are the words Not to be used again: ballabosh Jun 2014 #340

And the naughty bits of Reginald Maudling A HERETIC I AM Jun 2014 #419

You Gotta Be Kidding Me... WillyT Jun 2014 #14

Fuck the four trolls on that jury bobduca Jun 2014 #15

FYI: "Results of your Jury Service" Chan790 Jun 2014 #54

Juror #7, your opinions help set community standards and you don't have to go along with A Simple Game Jun 2014 #104

No shit.... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #116

I am shocked that there are people who do not understand how the community standards are formed here MADem Jun 2014 #194

Loved the clueless rationale of Number 7!! "I don't really have a choice...?" Uh, no--YOU DO have MADem Jun 2014 #188

Thanks for sharing that. bobduca Jun 2014 #426

One takes their chances. NCTraveler Jun 2014 #16

It is a subject that deserves any (and I do mean any) nastiness JEB Jun 2014 #17

Election year = infiltration by Concernbots. nt valerief Jun 2014 #18

Yep. +1 Gemini Cat Jun 2014 #86

More crap from the humor challenged here. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #19

A ridiculous hide. Rude Pundit should have his own version of the Taterguy exception here. stevenleser Jun 2014 #20

Agreed mcar Jun 2014 #29

There are a vocal few on DU that purposely look for things to be offended by. n/t A Simple Game Jun 2014 #111

Yes there are few here who appear to want to monitor what DUers read or watch. They do seem okay sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #371

Just for the record: In_The_Wind Jun 2014 #32

Interesting. I wonder if those were for the statement by him that was known as the exception. stevenleser Jun 2014 #71

I wasn't around when the exception happened but I think someone called him a dumbass in META. In_The_Wind Jun 2014 #78

Got it. No, that doesnt seem like the exception. I looked it up, his exception is to call other stevenleser Jun 2014 #114

D'oh In_The_Wind Jun 2014 #241

WTF did that get hidden for? Love to see the alert reasoning on that one! bluesbassman Jun 2014 #273

I agree with you ... would love to see the alert and jury reasons. In_The_Wind Jun 2014 #277

LOL. Didn't have a clue what that was about. bluesbassman Jun 2014 #279

i recently had a post hidden for replying to a post that i referred to as a dumb-ass post.. frylock Jun 2014 #298

Alerters comments and results . . . taterguy Jun 2014 #354

Amazing. The alerter didn't even have a clue WTF they were alerting about, but boy it was bad! bluesbassman Jun 2014 #366

Yeah, I think so, too. closeupready Jun 2014 #60

He's playing a character, like Stephen Colbert, and like Colbert he says outrageous things. The stevenleser Jun 2014 #244

Right. And I'd guess he's likely about my age, because closeupready Jun 2014 #282

I propose a Rude Pundit protected group. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #337

I would go along with this. Then we can post a note in GD that there is a new post with a link. stevenleser Jun 2014 #338

I propose people get their heads out of their asses tabasco Jun 2014 #399

Kinda like the BOG? U4ikLefty Jun 2014 #478

There are times when you realize sharp_stick Jun 2014 #23

You too were alerted on this morning... sheshe2 Jun 2014 #401

Thanks for the heads up sharp_stick Jun 2014 #406

Juror #5 rocks. NT hueymahl Jun 2014 #455

I posted a suitably edited version of the thread. Now we can all be happy. JVS Jun 2014 #24

I agree with the hide. dawg Jun 2014 #25

I disagree with the hide because the rule that used to apply before the jury system was that... JVS Jun 2014 #36

I see your point. dawg Jun 2014 #40

Agreed, n/t doxydad Jun 2014 #177

I voted to leave it JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #37

Could you post the results please? SwankyXomb Jun 2014 #280

Bingo! William769 Jun 2014 #39

So you going to alert or vote to hide all RP posts from now on? whatchamacallit Jun 2014 #42

I have never alerted on any post. dawg Jun 2014 #48

Really!?! hueymahl Jun 2014 #79

Telling Cheney to "go suck a dick" is making gay sex out to be an ultimate put-down. dawg Jun 2014 #96

And your response shows both an utter misunderstanding of satire and hueymahl Jun 2014 #102

Explain to me how that part was satire. dawg Jun 2014 #115

Might as well explain algebra to a elephant. NT hueymahl Jun 2014 #121

I'm not an elephant. And I understand algebra. dawg Jun 2014 #132

Ummmm....fellatio occurs in straight couples, too, you know. riqster Jun 2014 #129

Dick Cheney is male. dawg Jun 2014 #136

And Liz is not. riqster Jun 2014 #147

So he's definitely being homophobic in the comment about Dick ... dawg Jun 2014 #160

Thanks for the in-depth explanation. riqster Jun 2014 #168

so are we going to hide every post with a "fuck you" in it? grasswire Jun 2014 #192

No. "Fuck you" applies equally to all. dawg Jun 2014 #238

"suck dick" applies equally to all, as well. grasswire Jun 2014 #255

Do you really not see how this is being used as a homophobic slur? dawg Jun 2014 #263

no, it actually excludes straight men completely. and that is kind of the point. bettyellen Jun 2014 #427

how about telling him to suck a hemorrhoidal asshole snooper2 Jun 2014 #250

I like that one! dawg Jun 2014 #260

Cheney IS a hemorrhoidal asshole!!! AngryDem001 Jun 2014 #347

Sucks to find out how many brogressives are on this site huh? nt redqueen Jun 2014 #308

Men and women have oral sex. Nothing wrong with that. Context may be everything. L0oniX Jun 2014 #87

Interesting, the final post in that thread complains it is sexist. Demit Jun 2014 #107

To me, the homophobia of the comment is obvious. dawg Jun 2014 #127

Yes, you said that. Demit Jun 2014 #205

It shouldn't be an insult at all. That's the point I'm trying to make. dawg Jun 2014 #234

Well we're going to end up talking past one another Demit Jun 2014 #281

Perhaps adding the words The Wizard Jun 2014 #456

Me too. It was a righteous rant but I couldn't get past the subject line. MadrasT Jun 2014 #233

This. redqueen Jun 2014 #249

+1000 PoliticalPothead Jun 2014 #381

Solution, do not read the Rude Pundit. You will be offended, he is offensive, he doesn't care sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #410

It isn't about sex or "dirty" words. dawg Jun 2014 #413

We have different priorities as to what is most offensive, obviously. When I see the word sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #421

I get where you're coming from sabrina 1, but two wrongs don't make a right. dawg Jun 2014 #422

I don't think you do, dawg. But that's okay, not everyone can remain focused totally on the evil sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #423

Do you think I'm saying these things to defend the Cheneys? dawg Jun 2014 #425

It isn't about US always, do you understand that? WE are NOT despite our zenophobic notion to the sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #428

I don't have to choose between the two, sabrina 1. dawg Jun 2014 #429

You did choose between the two. You put the focus on a few words. Sorry, but that is a fact. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #430

So, just a smidge of bigotry is okay, so long as the rest of the message is good? dawg Jun 2014 #432

No, bigotry is the hallmark of our Foreign Policy. So it is not okay, but we, our government, sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #437

Brilliant. Can I steal this? You've said it much better than I ever could... nt riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #472

Context is everything vlakitti Jun 2014 #442

Thanks, I just try to put it in perspective. I ask myself this: ACTUAL RAPE and SODOMY of Children V sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #443

More Rude Pundit, please! derby378 Jun 2014 #26

OMG! What is wrong with hitting the "ignore" button or just IGNORING the post and moving on? kysrsoze Jun 2014 #27

Because the perpetually offended want to keep YOU from enjoying something. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #31

Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #63

I used to think that it was solely a right winger trait, so much for that. corkhead Jun 2014 #70

A wise friend told me: HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #125

You noticed? hobbit709 Jun 2014 #133

Yes, a couple hundred alerts I've juried. HooptieWagon Jun 2014 #153

Yep Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2014 #246

Now, Lantern Waste gets tagged. Some folks managed the impossible: Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #134

When you get offended by everything, then you will offend someone. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #143

Well, I'm a Gunhumper: I got High Standards. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #155

another ridiculous hide grasswire Jun 2014 #196

It goes against AUTHORITARIAN REPUBLICAN ideals. Punishment can be fun. L0oniX Jun 2014 #98

Hiding that rant is ridiculous deutsey Jun 2014 #30

Absurd! ChazInAz Jun 2014 #33

I read the post. I can't believe it was hidden. dballance Jun 2014 #34

Bad precedent whatchamacallit Jun 2014 #35

Yup. Ominous and ridiculous nt riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #41

+1 Javaman Jun 2014 #204

The Alert Should Have Been Summarily Dismissed ProfessorGAC Jun 2014 #43

Very good point. kysrsoze Jun 2014 #46

'summarily'? Are you calling for all alerts to be pre-screened before getting to a jury? muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #50

Ok With Me ProfessorGAC Jun 2014 #56

'Automatically'? I don't think you think what these adverbs you're using mean muriel_volestrangler Jun 2014 #65

I'm Done With This ProfessorGAC Jun 2014 #73

The admins have never retracted a hide ...that I know of. L0oniX Jun 2014 #99

After 141 recs wyldwolf Jun 2014 #44

It's revelatory of an issue of the jury system. Chan790 Jun 2014 #93

Reccing a thread does not prevent one from being on a jury pintobean Jun 2014 #113

That mitigates the issue slightly. Chan790 Jun 2014 #144

It would be nice if there were a rec override for juries. JVS Jun 2014 #446

And because of the "hide", more people will read & rec. mwooldri Jun 2014 #365

rude can cross the line. mopinko Jun 2014 #45

Yes, let's hide stuff that shouldn't be hidden Hissyspit Jun 2014 #307

apparently. mopinko Jun 2014 #332

Kickety Wrec. GeorgeGist Jun 2014 #47

I hope he will recover from the terrible tragedy of having a post hidden. n/t Orsino Jun 2014 #49

Very unfortunate malaise Jun 2014 #51

Next time just post a link, I got to the link anyway. rickyhall Jun 2014 #52

Too rude for the prudes n2doc Jun 2014 #55

Or just a sign of the times Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #59

You spelled "fucking" wrong. Iggo Jun 2014 #74

One hundred and 43 recs, and some morons decided to alert and can it? Demeter Jun 2014 #57

Sometimes I think this place The Wizard Jun 2014 #457

What a shitty hide. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #58

Well, that's the problem packman Jun 2014 #61

The only thing rude about this post is that... kag Jun 2014 #62

and that "hook 'em" gesture is actually taken from the image of the goddess Isis niyad Jun 2014 #193

Once again, DU provides a detail I wasn't aware of! LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #411

It's sexist to tell anyone, male or female, to do what that subject header had Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #64

Those penis-size posts are not okay with me either. dawg Jun 2014 #75

Dude (or duddette) - You are way to sensitive to be on here hueymahl Jun 2014 #83

I'm a bleeding-heart liberal. dawg Jun 2014 #108

Again, you really don't get the purpose of satire hueymahl Jun 2014 #119

When you tell another man to go suck a dick ... dawg Jun 2014 #141

No it doesn't. hueymahl Jun 2014 #151

There is so much wrong with what you just wrote ... dawg Jun 2014 #178

It Never Occurred To Me That One Would Take An Insult Literally... WillyT Jun 2014 #264

I was literally just thinking exactly the same thing. betsuni Jun 2014 #470

LOL !!! - I'm Sure "God Damn You!" Had A Lot More Impact Several Hundred Years Ago... WillyT Jun 2014 #471

K&R stonecutter357 Jun 2014 #197

Yes it is insulting to the Dick LiberalLovinLug Jun 2014 #220

Exactly, it becomes Left-Wing Authoritism. N/T TheJames Jun 2014 #466

This gay male Puglover Jun 2014 #172

Thank you. n/t Ms. Toad Jun 2014 #165

No fucking shit... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #123

Definitely. And it's not even what the real issue is, so it keeps us from talking about it. Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #202

"men & guns:" On the frontlines of free speech! Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #122

Maybe something with washing machines. or doors can be worked into it somehow. Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #135

Or, "Always reaching for her revulva." Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #149

Kicked for exposure, that post has almost 150 recs This thread needs at least as many. corkhead Jun 2014 #66

Instead of voting to hide someone's post... nyabingi Jun 2014 #67

Totally stupid alert and hide. Iggo Jun 2014 #72

I just found this thread and think I should chime in ... meegbear Jun 2014 #76

+1,000,000 hobbit709 Jun 2014 #82

Why not ask Skinner for an explicit exception Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #112

Everyone SHOULD know Skinner's answer by now Capt. Obvious Jun 2014 #117

When you say that you edit out the "c" word, do you mean that RP uses that word? Nye Bevan Jun 2014 #118

Does he use it in regular real life? No. Does he use it once in a blue moon in his RP posts? stevenleser Jun 2014 #154

You mean, he isn't? LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #415

LOL, exactly. stevenleser Jun 2014 #418

We went round and round in the mod forum Puglover Jun 2014 #162

Not that you need it but I can vouch for you. When I have spoken to him, he said he is aware of stevenleser Jun 2014 #163

we all appreciate you posting his rants here, meeg.. frylock Jun 2014 #301

It's nice he allows you to post his entire piece Oilwellian Jun 2014 #322

Rude Pundit uses language to shock. To pick out one image to tsk-tsk it is missing the point. Demit Jun 2014 #77

Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #85

You just know someone will have a cow and will. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #88

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service PDittie Jun 2014 #137

All that hide did was definitely prove his point. hobbit709 Jun 2014 #140

Do you really not understand how sissy is a slur? NuclearDem Jun 2014 #268

thank you grasswire Jun 2014 #221

Waaaaaaaah we can't use misogynistic and homophobic insults waaaaaaaah! redqueen Jun 2014 #254

Amazes me lupinella Jun 2014 #295

I'm no longer surprised. redqueen Jun 2014 #299

Alert me too hueymahl Jun 2014 #90

As far as I know, Sissyk Jun 2014 #145

Didn't read that one, but wryter2000 Jun 2014 #89

Which C word? Censorship? hueymahl Jun 2014 #97

The C word that's the equivalent to the N word for women wryter2000 Jun 2014 #152

I respect that hueymahl Jun 2014 #161

Yes, its hard to understand in this context. stevenleser Jun 2014 #243

Attention all delicate flowers...^^THIS^^^ is the correct response... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #146

He is not a misogynist. The character he plays has a misogynist streak. And various other issues stevenleser Jun 2014 #215

Would someone who used F for a gay man be a homophobe? eom wryter2000 Jun 2014 #284

Not if they are an actor playing the part of a homophobe, No. nt stevenleser Jun 2014 #287

So, he's pretending to be a misogynist when he calls wryter2000 Jun 2014 #291

It's a pretty big hint when someone named "Lee Papa" writes as "The Rude Pundit" stevenleser Jun 2014 #292

There are people on DU who think it should be fine to use as well. redqueen Jun 2014 #256

some people will alert and vote to hide posts due to potty words being used. geek tragedy Jun 2014 #91

Alerting "potty" L0oniX Jun 2014 #95

Well fuckety-fuck! That's fucking goddamned bullshit, I agree. Fucking shitass alerters! nt ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2014 #100

Democracticunderchurch.org L0oniX Jun 2014 #94

Such Fucking Bullshit! ybbor Jun 2014 #105

Who was the delicate flower that objected to that? truebrit71 Jun 2014 #110

According to the inter-office memo... jberryhill Jun 2014 #157

It was one of his better posts, and they're all pretty good. mn9driver Jun 2014 #124

Dumb hide. zappaman Jun 2014 #138

ALERT! DANGER WILL ROBINSON davidthegnome Jun 2014 #139

Snort! Guffaw! Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #271

WTF indeed! Some days this place really sucks Aldo Leopold Jun 2014 #142

sucking dick is one of the many tools of the patriarchy d_b Jun 2014 #148

Can't see that, but I can't see in this forrest. Eleanors38 Jun 2014 #185

.. d_b Jun 2014 #219

The thought police cross all party lines Android3.14 Jun 2014 #150

FYI, your post was "alerted" I was Jury #2 . :) 2banon Jun 2014 #228

That's just pathetic Android3.14 Jun 2014 #341

Not a fan of them, but there have been more hides lately quinnox Jun 2014 #159

it is a way to disrupt and chill speech nt grasswire Jun 2014 #227

. libodem Jun 2014 #167

Well said Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2014 #253

YES! YES! YES! YES! AngryDem001 Jun 2014 #350

Exactly! ctsnowman Jun 2014 #452

I Would Never, Sir, Vote To Hide A Piece From The Rude One The Magistrate Jun 2014 #169

Thanks for the link to the original RP rant LiberalLovinLug Jun 2014 #170

. libodem Jun 2014 #171

. libodem Jun 2014 #173

Good one! Aldo Leopold Jun 2014 #217

. libodem Jun 2014 #229

Love it! pacalo Jun 2014 #436

Why, thank you libodem Jun 2014 #438

If I have to use ignore tools for the ones complaining the loudest & endlessly... pacalo Jun 2014 #439

I hear what you are saying libodem Jun 2014 #440

It is what it is... doxydad Jun 2014 #174

that post should not be hidden. samsingh Jun 2014 #181

I have no problem with that hide - would have voted the same way - over-the-top offensive DrDan Jun 2014 #182

WTH?!?! TRP is writing about a man WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WAR CRIMES. WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN WinkyDink Jun 2014 #207

no apology necessary DrDan Jun 2014 #214

this is DU now. Javaman Jun 2014 #186

One post was hidden because of a stupid homophobic and misogynistic remark NuclearDem Jun 2014 #187

So go ahead and ignore him, but that doesn't mean it should be hidden from the rest of us... truebrit71 Jun 2014 #247

+1 TorchTheWitch Jun 2014 #363

I was on the jury - voted against hiding el_bryanto Jun 2014 #195

I agree with that JustAnotherGen Jun 2014 #300

WTH?! A DU JURY voted DOWN TRP?! For railing against THE DICK CHENEY?! FTS, man. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #198

But it was filled with misogyny and homophobia. Right in the title. Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #208

I get it now. It's time to take down TRP, because he's---GASP!!---"offensive." NS, S. WinkyDink Jun 2014 #213

EPIC WIN KamaAina Jun 2014 #203

Apparently the huffy HOF group don't like the word dick. Cleita Jun 2014 #216

So the "huffy HOF group" has the power to pack juries? KamaAina Jun 2014 #222

No Kidding Blue_Adept Jun 2014 #226

No one else alerts on words like the D word, especially when Cleita Jun 2014 #269

They have the power to alert until something sticks and the jury Cleita Jun 2014 #251

Tinfoil hats off, please KamaAina Jun 2014 #252

Here comes the accusations when you see some uncomfortable truth Cleita Jun 2014 #258

"alert until something sticks" KamaAina Jun 2014 #262

There are more than one person attached to that group and members have Cleita Jun 2014 #267

Your post is crap. Agschmid Jun 2014 #474

A post can only be alerted once. jeff47 Jun 2014 #320

I wasn't talking about a single post. Cleita Jun 2014 #330

well then you would agree that your theory that this alert was a HOF attack is unfounded bullshit. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #368

This place is becoming unbelievably stupid. zeemike Jun 2014 #224

+1 Javaman Jun 2014 #240

What a steep price for unity! n/t xocet Jun 2014 #445

isn't it? a sad statement. nt Javaman Jun 2014 #459

I agree. Cleita Jun 2014 #275

This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jun 2014 #225

Puritan Underground? KG Jun 2014 #230

kick & rec angel823 Jun 2014 #231

Now that I've read this, I'm flummoxed as to why it was hidden. 2banon Jun 2014 #232

Ridiculous! liberalmuse Jun 2014 #239

If I were meegbear, that would be the last Rude Pundit OP I would make... SidDithers Jun 2014 #242

Juries utterly fail at perspective and context and this is an example. stevenleser Jun 2014 #294

Agreed. nt Bobbie Jo Jun 2014 #324

heh shanti Jun 2014 #245

You said Dick Oilwellian Jun 2014 #334

yeah shanti Jun 2014 #465

Quite Surprised bpj62 Jun 2014 #248

'Waaaaaah waaaaaaah! Why can't we post misogynistic and homophobic insults!' redqueen Jun 2014 #259

I just totally fucking love NuclearDem Jun 2014 #265

It's great isn't it? redqueen Jun 2014 #274

Are you in The rude pundits head bpj62 Jun 2014 #345

Banning an article on DU is progress? liberalmuse Jun 2014 #409

the thing about being rude, is that you are intentionally alienating people La Lioness Priyanka Jun 2014 #261

This is bullshit... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #270

The ethical thing to do is remove yourself from the jury pool. nt redqueen Jun 2014 #297

What a singularly bad idea... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #302

Hey, if being unethical is your thing, go for it. redqueen Jun 2014 #305

Whatever... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #306

Let me guess, you were one of the people defending the fried chicken and watermelon shit, too... redqueen Jun 2014 #310

I don't even know what in the hell you're talking about Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #312

LOL, of course you don't. redqueen Jun 2014 #315

As have you... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #316

You just said you'd never vote to hide anything as a juror. redqueen Jun 2014 #317

You're rolling on the floor... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #318

Are you fucking serious? redqueen Jun 2014 #319

Not often...Not really Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #321

LOL redqueen Jun 2014 #323

Seriously. You're not laughing out loud at this... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #325

Oh I most certainly am. redqueen Jun 2014 #327

I don't believe you...Not for a minute Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #329

OK, is anyone keeping track here? Is this third- or fourth-order outrage? eom TheJames Jun 2014 #467

current potus has stopped bushco from being prosecuted for war crimes questionseverything Jun 2014 #477

+ bazillion giftedgirl77 Jun 2014 #309

I'll do the same LittleBlue Jun 2014 #433

In the words of Senator James Abourezk, this place is becoming a "chickenshit outfit" villager Jun 2014 #276

Some people are fucking wimps. Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2014 #278

Nope, no irony in this whatsoever. NuclearDem Jun 2014 #283

Agreed. blackspade Jun 2014 #285

It was indeed offensive. JEFF9K Jun 2014 #289

I have to ask myself how does a Woman perceive these phrases randys1 Jun 2014 #303

The point of the Rude Pundit completely goes over your head apparently. Hissyspit Jun 2014 #304

Oh no, we get it. Certain kinds of bigotry are ok with him. redqueen Jun 2014 #314

Yes, his character also uses racist and religious slurs. stevenleser Jun 2014 #420

Dishonest comparison. In your examples he is referring to bigots who think that way. redqueen Jun 2014 #462

No it's not. Now you are moving the goalposts. First, it was "he only uses anti-women and anti-LGBT stevenleser Jun 2014 #463

All you've shown is that he used the words. Do you now want to claim context doesn't matter? redqueen Jun 2014 #464

Not really. NuclearDem Jun 2014 #357

Not really. Hissyspit Jun 2014 #359

He's brilliant and one of the first media pundits who considered Women's Issues important. BlancheSplanchnik Jun 2014 #311

Well...if he was truly concerned about Women's Issues... The Road Runner Jun 2014 #333

The ''abuse'' if any....... DeSwiss Jun 2014 #352

LOL...Very Rude...But Funny The Road Runner Jun 2014 #358

RP's suggestion that Dick Cheney is having a sexual relationship with his daughter... The Road Runner Jun 2014 #326

All of this brings to mind. sgtbenobo Jun 2014 #331

Alerting. zeemike Jun 2014 #339

It was well deserved. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #336

You should wear a badge. Android3.14 Jun 2014 #342

The same standards that apply to other DU posts apply to posts that repost RP aikoaiko Jun 2014 #346

Oh, I see. Censoring peope is okay because censoring people is okay Android3.14 Jun 2014 #351

Juries judging the appropriateness of posts is a feature of DU. aikoaiko Jun 2014 #355

Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #361

Maybe, but they are not as pathetic as those whining about a hide aikoaiko Jun 2014 #364

Also in reply to #361! Damn, People! TheJames Jun 2014 #468

Time to call the... NealK Jun 2014 #343

I am very disappointed that this wonderful article was hidden. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #344

K&R DeSwiss Jun 2014 #348

Meta moment: ucrdem Jun 2014 #349

Well, this should get interesting. Sissyk Jun 2014 #353

It's done. No consensus. nt ucrdem Jun 2014 #356

Oh and in terms of the possible outcomes, 4: the post is fine, it gets discussed, life goes on. nt Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #369

4 hidden posts and counting = textbook disruptive meta. nt ucrdem Jun 2014 #374

who has 4 hidden posts and what does that have to do with anything? Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #380

What??!! I have NO hidden posts. I'm pretty sure I've NEVER been a textbook disruptive meta! riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #385

The thread. nt ucrdem Jun 2014 #386

See, hosts are supposed to consider only the OP and judge it on it's own merits Autumn Jun 2014 #398

You do realize I'm not whining about DU right? riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #376

hosts have zero authority to demand ask or implore you to do anything. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #377

Please read what I actually wrote, thanks. nt ucrdem Jun 2014 #382

I'm sympathetic, but objecting to jury decisions is the definition of whining about DU. ucrdem Jun 2014 #378

How do you know "everyone" has had their say? riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #387

Do what you like. nt ucrdem Jun 2014 #388

This is the new DU, more terrible every day. A good place ruined with petty selfish bullshit. Exultant Democracy Jun 2014 #375

I haven't been here long and I've been on a lot of juries in the past few months. tofuandbeer Jun 2014 #383

And this thread now has 4 more hits by the perpetually outraged. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #384

jury nullification solved prohibition NuttyFluffers Jun 2014 #389

Oddly enough, I think that as an article on the internet it might not violate DU standards Babel_17 Jun 2014 #390

Yes, I've been told that this is the gist of the host's conversation about this thread riderinthestorm Jun 2014 #393

Almost two hundred rec.s and they still hide it? another_liberal Jun 2014 #392

Unfuckingbelieveable. tabasco Jun 2014 #395

What is amazing is that the post was up for almost a whole day... SomethingFishy Jun 2014 #396

Oh, God… I wish I had seen that hidden post before I could no longer KnR it! MrMickeysMom Jun 2014 #397

You can still recommend it, I just did. Autumn Jun 2014 #400

Right you are... MrMickeysMom Jun 2014 #431

Never thought I'd see the day. liberalmuse Jun 2014 #403

Uhh... No. Owl Jun 2014 #404

The Self Appointed Guardians of Morality and Soldiers Against Bad Words Warpy Jun 2014 #405

Community standards say the Rude Pundit despite being hidden, has 198 recs. sabrina 1 Jun 2014 #407

Back Up! Ok, Go Forward! Stop! Back Up Again! BootinUp Jun 2014 #417

Not by this DUer, rider. pacalo Jun 2014 #435

How juries could be packed (a thought experiment) bobduca Jun 2014 #441

I think the simpler explanation is the switch to a 4 of 7 system. Warren Stupidity Jun 2014 #449

ha barbtries Jun 2014 #447

It's the obscenity mgardener Jun 2014 #448

It's easy to choose not to read what you don't like. backscatter712 Jun 2014 #461

K & R ctsnowman Jun 2014 #453

How exactly does this thread improve the lives of the poor? McCamy Taylor Jun 2014 #454

Improving the lives of the poor is an important issue of course. totodeinhere Jun 2014 #475

Dick and Liz Cheney can suck a bag of syphilitic dicks. backscatter712 Jun 2014 #460