Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What is 'misandry'? [View all]librechik
(30,693 posts)33. largely a myth. And definitely not a problem. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
203 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Your posts in that thread, and many others since then, here on DU, speak for themselves. nt
redqueen
May 2014
#100
Did it not dawn on you that feminists who are opposed to the normalization of misogynist slurs
redqueen
May 2014
#75
BTW, sending PMs to adversaries is a tactic of intimidation...does not work with me
noiretextatique
May 2014
#194
And importantly, they are not oppressed on the basis of their sex or ethnicity. nt
redqueen
May 2014
#41
Some can't seem to understand that race-based and class-based oppression are two different things.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#143
No shit. They're unable to see past the end of their own damn nose, as I've said before. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#192
White males have lost SOME of their advantages. (Some, not all.) Women and people of color are now
Squinch
May 2014
#128
Mostly they lost one yardstick to justify social privilege, a much higher paycheck
Warpy
May 2014
#134
There's also the question of how much power these hypothetical misandrists might have to
el_bryanto
May 2014
#13
One-word posts are not very convincing, by and large. And "fail" isn't really an argument. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#148
The person I responded to failed quite a bit in this thread. That's a fact, not an argument. n/t
Gore1FL
May 2014
#156
thank you for your standard level of thoughtfulness and intelligent discourse on gender.
geek tragedy
May 2014
#175
Because people (not you) often use supposed small objections to subtly chip away at someone's
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#150
I certainly understand that view. And I don't blame anyone (of any gender) who wishes to eschew
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#151
I get that. And anything involving excessive bureaucracy tends to be a not-so-good thing.
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#162
"Only 15 percent of cases go to court, and, of those, half involve domestic abuse."
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#152
Yikes! I guess I always knew there were female misogynists, but that's a new low.
Raksha
May 2014
#119
The unmarried Andry daughter, but she prefers to be addressed as Ms. Andry ...
11 Bravo
May 2014
#66
You said you weren't there, but you're embellishing the details constantly.
geek tragedy
May 2014
#132
Complaining about no-fault divorce would seem to be self-defeating, in his case, wouldn't it?
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#166
I'm assuming something quite different about any abuse that would have happened in this chap's
geek tragedy
May 2014
#167
No way for me to know that. But I wouldn't discount the possibility, to be sure. n/t
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#169
I'm just another dude with an opinion. But I try to be as understanding and compassionate
nomorenomore08
May 2014
#173
Re: banning the popcorn smiley. If there is one thing I would take a strong stand for
quinnox
May 2014
#122
kind of explains why some are so desperate to believe privilege doesn't exist!
bettyellen
May 2014
#137
In addition to the answers above, I'd like to mention access to women's bodies.
redqueen
May 2014
#199