Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
186. But
Tue May 27, 2014, 05:31 PM
May 2014

"a lot of blue links to other DU posts"

...they seem so ebil!!!

White House colluded with House Republicans *against* Democrats to WEAKEN surveillance bill.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024984920

Whatever happened to the Sensenbrenner love? I mean, I more suprised that a bill made it through the House.

House Passes NSA Bill

WASHINGTON – The House today passed the USA Freedom Act, a bill on NSA spying.

Laura W. Murphy, director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office, had this reaction:

“While far from perfect, this bill is an unambiguous statement of congressional intent to rein in the out-of-control NSA. While we share the concerns of many – including members of both parties who rightly believe the bill does not go far enough – without it we would be left with no reform at all, or worse, a House Intelligence Committee bill that would have cemented bulk collection of Americans’ communications into law. We will fight to secure additional improvements in the Senate.”

https://www.aclu.org/national-security/house-passes-nsa-bill


EFF Dismayed by House's Gutted USA FREEDOM Act

EFF and Other Civil Liberties Organizations Call on Congress to Support Uncompromising Reform

Since the introduction of the USA FREEDOM Act, a bill that has over 140 cosponsors, Congress has been clear about its intent: ending the mass collection of Americans' calling records. Many members of Congress, the President's own review group on NSA activities, and the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board all agree that the use of Section 215 to collect Americans' calling records must stop. Earlier today, House Leadership reached an agreement to amend the bipartisan USA FREEDOM Act in ways that severely weaken the bill, potentially allowing bulk surveillance of records to continue. The Electronic Frontier Foundation cannot support a bill that doesn't achieve the goal of ending mass spying. We urge Congress to support uncompromising NSA reform and we look forward to working on the Senate's bipartisan version of the USA FREEDOM Act.

Passing the bill out of the Judiciary Committee for a vote on the House floor is an important sign that Rep. Bob Goodlatte, Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, and other leaders of the House are engaging in a conversation over NSA reform. We are glad that the House added a clause to the bill clarifying the content of communications cannot be obtained with Section 215. Unfortunately, the bill's changed definitions, the lack of substantial reform to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act, and the inability to introduce a special advocate in the FISA Court severely weakens the bill.

In particular, we are concerned with the new definition of "specific selection term," which describes and limits who or what the NSA is allowed to surveil. The new definition is incredibly more expansive than previous definitions. Less than a week ago, the definition was simply "a term used to uniquely describe a person, entity, or account.” While that definition was imperfect, the new version is far broader.1 The new version not only adds the undefined words "address" and "device," but makes the list of potential selection terms open-ended by using the term "such as." Congress has been clear that it wishes to end bulk collection, but given the government's history of twisted legal interpretations, this language can't be relied on to protect our freedoms.

Further, the bill does not sufficiently address Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendments Act. We are specifically concerned that the new language references "about" searches, which collect and review messages of users who do not even communicate with surveillance targets.Congress must include reforming Section 702 in any NSA reform. This includes stopping the NSA from searching illegally collected Americans' communications, stopping the suspicionless "about" surveillance, and ensuring companies can report on the exact number of orders they receive and the number of users affected.

We are encouraged by Senator Leahy's commitment to continue with the more comprehensive version of the USA FREEDOM Act over the summer and look forward to working towards NSA reform in the Senate.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/eff-dismayed-houses-gutted-usa-freedom-act


Obama Administration To Reveal Justification For Drone Strikes On U.S. Citizens
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024979665

Horrible, this should not happen...wait, isn't this good?

K&R Puzzledtraveller May 2014 #1
you are contributing to the meh attitude that has the president worried about Nov Doctor_J May 2014 #2
I would say the President is contributing to the "meh" attitude, not the poster. CaliforniaPeggy May 2014 #4
Nah, the poster is doing a lovely job of blaming the President for jeff47 May 2014 #5
It's pretty much all the poster ever does...nt SidDithers May 2014 #11
Closer to exclusively. nt Bobbie Jo May 2014 #26
THE BUCK STOPS HERE blkmusclmachine May 2014 #223
+10,000 nt okaawhatever May 2014 #356
And yet, you cannot refute anything in the OP. Or maybe you can, so I'll wait, before deciding sabrina 1 May 2014 #370
well, then you and your fellow ____ here can point out which stupidicus May 2014 #41
So are you saying that the OP is making it all up? Or that some or all of the complaints arent rhett o rick May 2014 #89
The usual. Autumn May 2014 #218
Wow that's a dumb post. jeff47 May 2014 #284
Why dont you simplify your responses here to, "None of it's the fault of the President."? nm rhett o rick May 2014 #299
Because some of them are the fault of the President jeff47 May 2014 #306
What debate? Those that support the president are never seen in any of the threads rhett o rick May 2014 #310
Speaking for myself, I have little to contribute to those threads. randome May 2014 #316
I can understand when one doesnt participate, but when the whole rhett o rick May 2014 #326
Most of those horrible mistakes are on Obama's shoulders. JDPriestly May 2014 #106
That's about the only item on the list that is not Obama's responsibility, sole responsibility. JDPriestly May 2014 #116
Is there such a thing as Executive Orders anymore? I know Bush used them 'liberally'. sabrina 1 May 2014 #165
So you want Obama to be a dictator. jeff47 May 2014 #285
BS Strawman bvar22 May 2014 #323
So you think Reid is ignoring the President then? You want a Democratic President to be powerless? sabrina 1 May 2014 #324
"So you want Obama to be a dictator," is the sign of desperation. rhett o rick May 2014 #330
And you had the nerve to post that after calling someone else's post stupid? merrily May 2014 #353
Exactly! He should arrestt those that commit war crimes, and Constitutional crimes! grahamhgreen May 2014 #372
I guess you missed all the items that begin, "The White House," "The Administration" "Obama" or merrily May 2014 #354
sorry cp. so few of my post are NOT sarcastic that I no longer mark those Doctor_J May 2014 #13
Me too. Is making it ballyhoo May 2014 #37
Too bad we don't all have your boomer sense... SidDithers May 2014 #78
NO MORE "THIRD WAY" blkmusclmachine May 2014 #224
Do you ever post anything other than this kind of shite? How do you feel about the rhett o rick May 2014 #236
... SidDithers May 2014 #237
Ah....the usual corporate dogs only comeback LiberalLovinLug May 2014 #246
... SidDithers May 2014 #258
Results of Jury service Paolo123 May 2014 #290
Excellent, thanks... SidDithers May 2014 #307
Yet, your first post on this thread was an ad hom and nothing else. merrily May 2014 #359
... LiberalLovinLug May 2014 #309
If he posts anything besides ad homs and smilies, I've been missing all the posts merrily May 2014 #357
please explain what you mean by 'boomer' sense navarth May 2014 #243
Wow, the old right wing attack on the perceived 'boomer', translation 'liberal'. Why would any sabrina 1 May 2014 #371
It says a lot about the routine level of Third Way engagement here that you took the post as serious woo me with science May 2014 #15
Oh So Helpless! Phlem May 2014 #31
Yes - so helpless that he can decapitate the Libyan government with air strikes Maedhros May 2014 #53
that's why I never liked Poes: de facto they only redouble the amount of fundie nonsense MisterP May 2014 #210
So true, 'they are left with attempts to smear the messenger and ludicrous protests that the sabrina 1 May 2014 #358
Totally agree. Like so many others (!) I was snookered by the wonderful Obama rhetoric in 2007. Peregrine Took May 2014 #315
Boxes in your garage? Armstead May 2014 #48
Obama has made terrible decisions in his appointments. This is a big country. JDPriestly May 2014 #99
He's not a king! But....which US Presidents were kings? Yet, they got big things done. merrily May 2014 #381
Alert billhicks76 May 2014 #118
Whole reply was sarcasm Doctor_J May 2014 #123
Ahh billhicks76 May 2014 #235
Bwah! woo me with science May 2014 #292
Sorry. I thought the veterans and especially the old school Dems were all familiar with my politics Doctor_J May 2014 #297
I thought it was perfect. woo me with science May 2014 #318
Disturbing. historylovr May 2014 #3
Any guess what that "D" stands for??? I know he hangs around with Christian Dominionists, but that'd blkmusclmachine May 2014 #225
I used to think I knew the answer, but now I know merrily May 2014 #362
If only Mitt had won the election... randys1 May 2014 #6
That's not really the point. Mitt did NOT win, Obama did. Maedhros May 2014 #56
Where to begin... randys1 May 2014 #61
Not quite. Maedhros May 2014 #69
strawman MY ASS randys1 May 2014 #83
I think you are personalizing this too much Armstead May 2014 #85
Exact opposite, half of his country almost has made it ONLY about Obama and randys1 May 2014 #156
I was being polite with you. You respond with insults. Maedhros May 2014 #108
It is an insult to say "My ass" in a response to your post? randys1 May 2014 #157
With one exception, every item listed in the OP is the result of one of Obama's appointments JDPriestly May 2014 #124
So why did he run for president BrotherIvan May 2014 #175
Good questions. CanSocDem May 2014 #396
Baloney. No asked him to reverse 200 years of problems. And it's a meme that a liberal cant get to merrily May 2014 #363
Because the other would have been worse, the worst shit from our guy is the new norm. Ed Suspicious May 2014 #66
When you weigh the real differences in so many areas, of course. randys1 May 2014 #67
Real change will not come until people stop giving bad politicians a pass Maedhros May 2014 #70
Fuck the party, has nothing to do with that randys1 May 2014 #72
I agree, now you point me to anyone capable of being President who is better randys1 May 2014 #400
Yes, Carlin called it. But I also need to point out that Jackpine Radical May 2014 #73
And, they think he should fix everything that has been broken for 200 yrs randys1 May 2014 #81
Nope. Pushing to fast-track TPP is not a failing of 200 year old policy. TPP is a today policy and Ed Suspicious May 2014 #88
Thank you. JDPriestly May 2014 #128
LOL Egnever May 2014 #131
I know, it is a problem, big one... randys1 May 2014 #154
It is the president who pissed off the young liberals Doctor_J May 2014 #287
Not really randys1 May 2014 #313
Was the existence of Blue Dogs and filibusters a surprise to Senator/Candidate Obama? merrily May 2014 #379
I look forward to the constant barrage of criticism from ALL, 100% of posters randys1 May 2014 #399
Yes. He promised hope and change. I've lost hope and change has not come. JDPriestly May 2014 #127
How does he close it if he cant move the prisoners anywhere? randys1 May 2014 #153
He's commander-in-chief ... GeorgeGist May 2014 #170
WHERE does he put the prisoners? randys1 May 2014 #187
Just keep taking everything he says and everything that happens in D.C. at face value. merrily May 2014 #384
So you dont know, do you. randys1 May 2014 #397
This Liberalynn May 2014 #82
We have too many parties, not too few. I think we have at least 23 parties to the left of Democrats, merrily May 2014 #366
To my disappointment, even John Stewart is going that route. merrily May 2014 #375
That's really a desperate argument. You seem to intimate that we should accept anything rhett o rick May 2014 #90
Nonsense, I criticize Obama all the time, you are not looking at the big picture i am afraid randys1 May 2014 #159
Yes, and the OP is going to cause the death of all that's good on earth and in heaven, too. merrily May 2014 #386
I canNOT keep up around here LOL randys1 May 2014 #398
That is conjecture. We don't know what would have happened if Romney had won. JDPriestly May 2014 #121
Using bad stuff rMoney might have done pscot May 2014 #194
Oh the old.. sendero May 2014 #380
K&R x 100000000000 SamKnause May 2014 #7
Only Nixon could go to China? Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #12
Wow. You must be worried about something. randome May 2014 #8
Clearly woo is "worried" wavesofeuphoria May 2014 #27
Because it sounds like shrillness instead of a thoughtful post. randome May 2014 #34
Kinda like when "The List" is posted, huh? 1000words May 2014 #43
Except I think woome actually put the OP list together herself, rather than copying and pasting. merrily May 2014 #377
So how about offering -- in a civil way -- some of those differing interpretations? Armstead May 2014 #86
Pick one. How about seeking immunity for telecom companies that hand over data? randome May 2014 #101
Me. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #110
It's a slippery slope when you say corporations can ignore legal warrants, though. randome May 2014 #120
My problem is with 'secret' activities in that vein. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #206
I agree with the secrecy part. We need more transparency. randome May 2014 #221
I see it as belonging at the top of that list dreamnightwind May 2014 #256
So, Immunity was needed because some prosecutor was going to charge the corporations with merrily May 2014 #378
How 'bout for cash? jeff47 May 2014 #298
That shouldn't be legal either. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #319
I'll grant you that one is open to intrpretation. But you miss my point. Armstead May 2014 #112
Agree with you there. randome May 2014 #125
Could you please elaborate on just what the "different light" might be on each point? JDPriestly May 2014 #130
Telecom immunity, for one. See above. randome May 2014 #151
Yes, clearly Greenwald is to blame for people's disillusionment Distant Quasar May 2014 #39
Or HAARP. LOL. JDPriestly May 2014 #132
as opposed to the one whose only observable expertise stupidicus May 2014 #42
So what is the subject? Obama is an awful President? randome May 2014 #71
right stupidicus May 2014 #163
I said I don't disagree with some of the points made. randome May 2014 #193
no, you're merely slip-sliding away from stupidicus May 2014 #345
Greenwald Effect? Do you mean Greenwald's being against cutting Social Security? MannyGoldstein May 2014 #196
I'm thinking that some of S&G's diehard supporters are starting to come to grips... randome May 2014 #219
Excellent OP. Le Taz Hot May 2014 #9
I love threads like this MohRokTah May 2014 #10
It certainly signals a problem when lists of the President's own policies have that effect. nt woo me with science May 2014 #17
the heads in the sand crowd Skittles May 2014 #28
Yup. Best not to engage with commercials that rewrite history. woo me with science May 2014 #29
ahhhhhhhh the Tiger Beat crowd Skittles May 2014 #30
There's one less believer you have to deal with. Phlem May 2014 #33
Testing, testing. Jackpine Radical May 2014 #76
Cool.... daleanime May 2014 #150
President Obama Leme May 2014 #14
when TPP passes will you relent? Doctor_J May 2014 #18
"We're in trouble"....ain't that the truth... truebrit71 May 2014 #22
well Leme May 2014 #24
It won't pass under Obama with this congress. joshcryer May 2014 #234
Ultimately, I agree. Laelth May 2014 #46
If he sits back and lets Comcast take over the Internet, and he'll be ahead of Clinton Armstead May 2014 #87
Clinton. Glass-Steagall. tea and oranges May 2014 #96
True -- Except the Kid Gloves and the Gifts to Big Banks and Wall St. since 2008 come close Armstead May 2014 #100
Agree! Clinton totally set it up tea and oranges May 2014 #117
The good cop ship may have sailed, if it ever existed. merrily May 2014 #392
The Good Ship Cop? tea and oranges May 2014 #402
No one ever expects Democratic Presidents to be in that kind of competition. Also, merrily May 2014 #364
Tough call. Jackpine Radical May 2014 #77
So true. But these young'uns can't remember Eisenhower and did not learn about him JDPriestly May 2014 #134
Check out the 1956 Republican Party Platform Deny and Shred May 2014 #282
The audacity of politics as usual. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #16
The Audacity of Sellout. Jackpine Radical May 2014 #138
Over on Disc, someone posted a graphic that stated Obama's wealth went from CrispyQ May 2014 #19
Source? I wouldn't be surprised by this news, but I need to see a link to the source Maedhros May 2014 #59
A lot of that was from book sales during his Presidential runs Dr Hobbitstein May 2014 #65
I hadn't seen all of these stories - thanks for the roundup Distant Quasar May 2014 #20
You forgot the Walmart photo-op. Also another one popped up today. in Geithner's new book Doctor_J May 2014 #21
"I never felt comfortable playing a populist." woo me with science May 2014 #25
We dun bin Jackpine Radical May 2014 #79
"playing" BrotherIvan May 2014 #40
Yeah, I am onto that now Doctor_J May 2014 #55
Statistically, any Democrat would have won in 2008 BrotherIvan May 2014 #109
He's Feyd Rautha. Maedhros May 2014 #60
A kinder, gentler oligarchy BrotherIvan May 2014 #103
yep...plus he is black noiretextatique May 2014 #169
and? Bobbie Jo May 2014 #308
historic change noiretextatique May 2014 #320
Yes. That is the sickest statement attributed to the President. JDPriestly May 2014 #136
Much to his relief he's in a second term and can quit the act. pa28 May 2014 #213
No rest for the weary. It's Presidential Library and legacy time. merrily May 2014 #389
Omigod, he really said that? Raksha May 2014 #350
Well, according to Geithner anyway Doctor_J May 2014 #351
So Obama's dictator then? jeff47 May 2014 #23
Thank you for one of the few posts on this thread that shows knowledge of civics. I see the OP msanthrope May 2014 #49
Yea, for civics 101.. giftedgirl77 May 2014 #63
^ THIS ^ mac56 May 2014 #74
It was actually Leahy who returned to teh practice of blue slipping nominees, not Reid. MohRokTah May 2014 #80
Fixed, thanks. (nt) jeff47 May 2014 #296
RE:Internet Armstead May 2014 #93
No, those aren't our two choices. jeff47 May 2014 #288
Those are the basic two choices Armstead May 2014 #302
Keeping the Internet slow, but "available to all" jeff47 May 2014 #312
Where I live the government did just that Armstead May 2014 #314
hmmmm Leme May 2014 #133
Because he isn't in Congress. jeff47 May 2014 #289
my point is that Leme May 2014 #349
The bad decisions were made by Obama appointees. JDPriestly May 2014 #143
Historical materialism is a farce. joshcryer May 2014 #239
The government should fund the roads and the basic internet structure. JDPriestly May 2014 #254
The House decides taxes. joshcryer May 2014 #255
The President sends the budget to Congress, though. Yes, they say yea or nay, but merrily May 2014 #361
The President has the most progressive budgets in history. joshcryer May 2014 #365
I don't agree. The very first budget he sent to Congress cut fuel subsidies for the poor. merrily May 2014 #368
LIHEAP had doubled in the year prior. joshcryer May 2014 #373
I disagree. merrily May 2014 #374
If your plan was going to work, it already would have worked. jeff47 May 2014 #291
What are your sources, your links for these statements? JDPriestly May 2014 #339
Every one of these outrages has an explanation treestar May 2014 #176
The Republicans have good explanations too Armstead May 2014 #303
Wrong...the FCC has the power to reclassify ISPs Maven May 2014 #177
Changing the early adopter mechanism would require Congress. joshcryer May 2014 #233
If consumer complaints were going to work, they already would have. jeff47 May 2014 #301
Read more closely. jeff47 May 2014 #295
^^^^^ This! +1. n/t ColesCountyDem May 2014 #189
+1 keep it up. sagat May 2014 #207
You assume that OP cares about civics. joshcryer May 2014 #229
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #249
They can't even think one step ahead on anything. joshcryer May 2014 #250
So you posted without reading a single word of the OP? Union Scribe May 2014 #251
It's obvious they came here to see a rebuttal. joshcryer May 2014 #253
We need Congress to fix the things Obama is doing all own his own? brentspeak May 2014 #317
Please make this a regular effort, woo. 1000words May 2014 #32
absolutely... considering that jeff47's excellent post upthread remains unchallenged msanthrope May 2014 #115
Please do not destroy the illusion zeemike May 2014 #35
he told us all that before he was elected! bigtree May 2014 #36
Well, it could be subjective & misleading. I know I left out a lot of important stories you posted. woo me with science May 2014 #47
same cherry-picking bullshit about my posts that you employ with the President bigtree May 2014 #75
Now, see that was my fault. I couldn't resist engaging. woo me with science May 2014 #141
oh, man! you are wound up! I wasn't trying to reargue all of the old news you posted bigtree May 2014 #162
Lots of negative adjectives there, but you still haven't supported your contention woo me with science May 2014 #164
you don't get a platform from me for this rehash bigtree May 2014 #167
Of course not. woo me with science May 2014 #168
you're in your own *little* world bigtree May 2014 #173
+1 bigtree... sheshe2 May 2014 #241
Sorry bigtree, but you're losing this one bigtime. Scuba May 2014 #265
+11111111 Tommymac May 2014 #208
Thank you for this hueymahl May 2014 #257
Awesome smackdown! Egnever May 2014 #142
Thank you bigtree berni_mccoy May 2014 #267
Bravo Bobbie Jo May 2014 #294
LOL!!! Capt. Obvious May 2014 #144
k/r 840high May 2014 #38
sad ain't it? stupidicus May 2014 #44
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth May 2014 #45
Oh..the tolling issue is back? One of the best threads on it.... msanthrope May 2014 #50
Bill Clinton will never be held responsible. Only the black dude in the WH will. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2014 #51
Who excuses the Clintons? woo me with science May 2014 #54
People who post OPs like this? tia uponit7771 May 2014 #58
Great response! Enthusiast May 2014 #135
"Wonder how much they spend on this internet bullcrap." woo me with science May 2014 #155
I have no doubt they are using our money to propagandize us. Enthusiast May 2014 #158
We should have more DU meetups so maybe you wouldn't have such a poor opinion of your fellows. randome May 2014 #160
See? I predicted woo would be called a racist in this thread! Doctor_J May 2014 #57
You win a prize. woo me with science May 2014 #64
Yes. Simply amazing. Such a prediction. I'm going to ask for some lottery numbers. Enthusiast May 2014 #137
Who was called a racist? Is someone guilty of something? The fact that you thought Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2014 #182
Do you really think progressives who criticize Obama from the left Distant Quasar May 2014 #84
Yeah because I called people racist! Yeah, that's what I did. Yeah, o.k. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2014 #228
I hold Bill Clinton responsible. JDPriestly May 2014 #146
I've never seen a leftist critic of this admin's policies Union Scribe May 2014 #199
Nah. What I've seen are excuses from the Left. I've seen double standards all around. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2014 #227
The difference between Clinton and Obama.. sendero May 2014 #382
We are still reaping the effects of those horrible Bush-Clinton-Bush policies, but I Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2014 #406
Thoughtful post... sendero May 2014 #408
You just want President Palin! QC May 2014 #52
To bad we have to spend so much effort watching and fighting the guy we voted for twice. pa28 May 2014 #62
I am sure the president apreciates your ongoing supporlt arely staircase May 2014 #68
That's the approach, ad hominem attacks. I think it's a "politically liberal" trait if not rhett o rick May 2014 #92
you clearly don't know what ad hominem means nt arely staircase May 2014 #98
And your intentions are clear. rhett o rick May 2014 #105
his gish gollop of obama hate would require an equal obsessiveness arely staircase May 2014 #107
That's pretty fucking hilarious Capt. Obvious May 2014 #114
I think it's odd behavior for posters that call themselves "politically liberal" to rhett o rick May 2014 #122
and those who never have a kind word for democrats? nt arely staircase May 2014 #129
and those who slobber praise Jakes Progress May 2014 #244
the OP is a democrat? nt arely staircase May 2014 #264
No. A Democrat. Jakes Progress May 2014 #405
Um, your post was a perfect example of an ad hominem. Vattel May 2014 #147
nope just surprised because I have never seen her support a democratic nominee. nr arely staircase May 2014 #409
me thinks thou dost protest too much nt hopemountain May 2014 #91
hmmm progressoid May 2014 #242
+1 Union Scribe May 2014 #252
it means exactly what i want it to mean: hopemountain Jun 2014 #410
Thanks. I will not vote for another round of this stuff. JDPriestly May 2014 #94
I'm with you! Enthusiast May 2014 #139
I'm new here, but I think this kind of thread is anti-productive. Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #95
So are the worship threads (cut the crap). So are the 30 threads on whether Doctor_J May 2014 #119
Yeah. Pukes would be angry with President Obama for pushing a right wing agenda. Enthusiast May 2014 #140
What I'm saying, is that we shouldn't be this hard on President Obama. Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #161
I think we should be on the President's ass like white on rice. Enthusiast May 2014 #178
Again, you're just focusing on a few negative items. Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #180
Few negatives? They are NATION CHANGING NEGATIVES! Enthusiast May 2014 #181
But look at how much better our lives are. Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #188
It's nice that you are so positive. Enthusiast May 2014 #192
But other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play? n/t QC May 2014 #262
Once one gets beyond the politics of personalities and tribes, Maedhros May 2014 #149
Pukes wanted a public option and stricter bank regulation? In what alternate universe? n/t eridani May 2014 #248
Do you REALLY believe Obama wanted a Public Option? bvar22 May 2014 #325
I was responding to the poster who thought the OP sounded just like a Republican opinion piece eridani May 2014 #367
Oh... it's you. lamp_shade May 2014 #97
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast May 2014 #102
You used blue links! Fuddnik May 2014 #104
Great post Oilwellian May 2014 #111
The fundamental flaw in the so-called reasoning of Administration apologists is this: Maedhros May 2014 #113
Brand loyalty relieves them of the responsibilities of citizenship. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #126
and...it is a BIG LIE noiretextatique May 2014 #171
these are the same guys who hated the idea of allowing primaries in '72 MisterP May 2014 #211
Yep. And we're stuck with it; more reason to make sure another Third Way corporatist does not Zorra May 2014 #145
Let's take Obama out of the equation whatchamacallit May 2014 #148
What good does it do to elect Democrats if they don't legislate in our favor? Maedhros May 2014 #179
I couldn't agree more whatchamacallit May 2014 #185
This is the one subject that really distresses me, Maedhros May 2014 #195
I can't express how offensive and dishonest I find that argument, too. woo me with science May 2014 #240
This nation is HUNGRY for that Old Tyme Democratic Party Populism! bvar22 May 2014 #328
du rec. xchrom May 2014 #152
So does this mean you won't be supporting Democrats in November? eom Progressive dog May 2014 #166
I am supporting progressive Democrats and letting the Blue Dogs go sit with their Republican rhett o rick May 2014 #172
That is clever, that'll show those Progressive dog May 2014 #184
People that arent liberal enough are Republicans. Some of them pretend to be Democrats, but vote rhett o rick May 2014 #204
Some of us pretend Liberals Progressive dog May 2014 #300
So you are claiming to be liberal (or progressive) but you favor "free trade", the TPP and NAFTA? rhett o rick May 2014 #304
I do post in threads that discuss free trade Progressive dog May 2014 #311
How does a progressive support the TPP? nm rhett o rick May 2014 #327
How does a progressive obsess over a Progressive dog May 2014 #331
So you are saying that the TPP, unlike NAFTA and the other "Free" trade agreements, wont rhett o rick May 2014 #333
You probably worded that wrong, Progressive dog May 2014 #334
In Massachusetts, I am okay with Warren and Markey, as well as with Lynch (seems to have merrily May 2014 #360
But, but, but you wouldnt not vote or vote in a manner that would allow a repub randys1 May 2014 #401
It looks to me like we are being manipulated. The wealthy oligarchs use their rhett o rick May 2014 #403
Agreed, and we cant actually resolve this at the national ballot box randys1 May 2014 #404
a lot of blue links to other DU posts treestar May 2014 #174
But ProSense May 2014 #186
they aren't links to his own posts. nt m-lekktor May 2014 #198
LOL! ProSense May 2014 #232
You know ProSense May 2014 #183
if folks are happy with obama's performance, they are not paying attention xiamiam May 2014 #190
same coin, I agree Leme May 2014 #212
That is a lot of crap to cut for just one month and JEB May 2014 #191
Just think what he could do with a Democratic Congress!!! nt MannyGoldstein May 2014 #197
he had a democratic Congress for the first couple years..we saw how that worked out..nt xiamiam May 2014 #202
Yeah, ProSense May 2014 #203
Kick & Rec Teamster Jeff May 2014 #200
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2014 #201
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Phlem May 2014 #205
If it's any consolation, I agree with that, even though I was mocked by people merrily May 2014 #352
So sorry about that. I'm a survivor and we need to speak our minds. Phlem May 2014 #355
Maybe Coakley was not isolated, but it was certainly noticeable as merrily May 2014 #376
A list! rug May 2014 #209
It's a very sad month. Baitball Blogger May 2014 #214
You should apply for the job of BOG host. L0oniX May 2014 #215
I thought it was Clinton/Walton Doctor_J May 2014 #217
Perhaps you should apply Bobbie Jo May 2014 #259
Irony. L0oniX May 2014 #276
I don't think that means Bobbie Jo May 2014 #293
First of all I originaly wasn't talking to you and I can't help it that you don't get the sarcasm... L0oniX May 2014 #329
First of all... Bobbie Jo May 2014 #332
Spot on MissDeeds May 2014 #216
+1,000. Truly, Inconvenient Truths about this foul legislating. The GOP must be doing cartwheels, blkmusclmachine May 2014 #220
The Republics are making him do all those things. GoneFishin May 2014 #222
And Joe Lieberman. merrily May 2014 #388
A lot can happen in 30 days. Autumn May 2014 #226
Wait, ProSense May 2014 #230
Jinks, you owe me a coke Autumn May 2014 #231
but those are just a list of a bunch of BLUE LINKS! Whisp May 2014 #238
So many here who just can't admit they were duped. Jakes Progress May 2014 #245
"cons rely on people not wanting to admit they were conned" bvar22 May 2014 #322
That is no doubt true of some. But some of the the exchanges I read here are so incredible merrily May 2014 #385
I admit it, I was duped. Conned. Hornswoggled. PowerToThePeople May 2014 #391
K&R x 10000000000000000000000 SamKnause May 2014 #247
Who said this was the most progressive admin ever?? DCBob May 2014 #260
I've seen DUers say that he is the most liberal President in their lifetime. progressoid May 2014 #271
It's not a ProSense May 2014 #274
If one is 60 years old, then they have lived through the administrations of Art_from_Ark May 2014 #369
Yeah, I agree with that statement. DCBob May 2014 #348
Even President Obama openly admits his policies are 1980s Moderate Republican (Reagan Era). bvar22 May 2014 #321
k-r thanks for compiling these lists nationalize the fed May 2014 #261
Published in 1957 - TBF May 2014 #263
Thank you woo, for this sad post. The betrayals just keep on coming. Scuba May 2014 #266
The "betrayals" ProSense May 2014 #269
Your post reminded me of another issue ... Scuba May 2014 #270
From the OP: ProSense May 2014 #272
I would direct this at conservatives as much as to liberals Enrique May 2014 #268
Liberals called Obama radical? I missed that. merrily May 2014 #390
i think you got what i said backwards Enrique May 2014 #394
Nope. Not even a little backwards. Your posted that you were directing your comments to merrily May 2014 #395
He's just doing ctsnowman May 2014 #273
Well, ProSense May 2014 #275
You're kidding right? Armstead May 2014 #281
If I was ProSense May 2014 #283
K&R for a great post. NorthCarolina May 2014 #277
Libertarian alert. No thanks, You Libertarians can have your, both parties are the same lie. Todays_Illusion May 2014 #278
Libertarian? Armstead May 2014 #280
That's the new critique of criticism from the left here: you don't agree with everything Obama neverforget May 2014 #346
Awesome post, thanks! MannyGoldstein May 2014 #279
K&R Only by admitting to our faults, can we hope to overcome them. raouldukelives May 2014 #286
Bingo Armstead May 2014 #305
What's wrong with helping out "moderate" Syrian rebels? Blue_Tires May 2014 #335
Fool us once....fool us how many times? woo me with science May 2014 #338
But the EU (especially France) has been balls-deep Blue_Tires May 2014 #340
"the US is sort of obligated to get involved, at least a little" woo me with science May 2014 #342
The campaign to conquer and divide liberals is now full blown. However, I will support mfcorey1 May 2014 #336
Well over 100,000 mercenaries being paid by tax dollars in Afghanistan woo me with science May 2014 #337
Well at least somebody still takes DU seriously ucrdem May 2014 #341
Wow. Nice RW hit job, right down to his golfing... maced666 May 2014 #343
You know, the very first time someone tried to label me as a "Right Winger" at DU, woo me with science May 2014 #344
Funny how trying to keep Obama's feet to the fire is now a right wing or libertarian criticism neverforget May 2014 #347
Obama asked us to "make him do it." (As if we ever could.) So, I guess they doubt his sincerity. merrily May 2014 #383
keep up the good fight. PowerToThePeople May 2014 #387
Thanks, woomewithscience. merrily May 2014 #393
Hmmm...200 recs, compared to 6 recs...YEP, somebody is doing it wrong! Rex May 2014 #407
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CUT THE CRAP! Your Mont...»Reply #186