Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CUT THE CRAP! Your Month in Review from the most "progressive" administration ever. [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)47. Well, it could be subjective & misleading. I know I left out a lot of important stories you posted.
Forgive me that I don't have time to go back any further than this week:
First family has beautiful smiles.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10025005583
Presidential Hugs and Selfies for Breakfast in Chicago (Don't Tell Michelle!)
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024991890
Prez: . . . I look like Morgan Freeman.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024988010
Michelle Obama: Watch out, because Malia's learning to drive!
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024987103
A young girl hands the President a US flag
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024985776
Prez surprises (delights) kids at WH talent show
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024979038
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10025005583
Presidential Hugs and Selfies for Breakfast in Chicago (Don't Tell Michelle!)
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024991890
Prez: . . . I look like Morgan Freeman.
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024988010
Michelle Obama: Watch out, because Malia's learning to drive!
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024987103
A young girl hands the President a US flag
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024985776
Prez surprises (delights) kids at WH talent show
http://election.democraticunderground.com/10024979038
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
410 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
CUT THE CRAP! Your Month in Review from the most "progressive" administration ever. [View all]
woo me with science
May 2014
OP
you are contributing to the meh attitude that has the president worried about Nov
Doctor_J
May 2014
#2
I would say the President is contributing to the "meh" attitude, not the poster.
CaliforniaPeggy
May 2014
#4
And yet, you cannot refute anything in the OP. Or maybe you can, so I'll wait, before deciding
sabrina 1
May 2014
#370
So are you saying that the OP is making it all up? Or that some or all of the complaints arent
rhett o rick
May 2014
#89
Why dont you simplify your responses here to, "None of it's the fault of the President."? nm
rhett o rick
May 2014
#299
What debate? Those that support the president are never seen in any of the threads
rhett o rick
May 2014
#310
That's about the only item on the list that is not Obama's responsibility, sole responsibility.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#116
Is there such a thing as Executive Orders anymore? I know Bush used them 'liberally'.
sabrina 1
May 2014
#165
So you think Reid is ignoring the President then? You want a Democratic President to be powerless?
sabrina 1
May 2014
#324
Exactly! He should arrestt those that commit war crimes, and Constitutional crimes!
grahamhgreen
May 2014
#372
I guess you missed all the items that begin, "The White House," "The Administration" "Obama" or
merrily
May 2014
#354
Do you ever post anything other than this kind of shite? How do you feel about the
rhett o rick
May 2014
#236
If he posts anything besides ad homs and smilies, I've been missing all the posts
merrily
May 2014
#357
Wow, the old right wing attack on the perceived 'boomer', translation 'liberal'. Why would any
sabrina 1
May 2014
#371
It says a lot about the routine level of Third Way engagement here that you took the post as serious
woo me with science
May 2014
#15
Yes - so helpless that he can decapitate the Libyan government with air strikes
Maedhros
May 2014
#53
that's why I never liked Poes: de facto they only redouble the amount of fundie nonsense
MisterP
May 2014
#210
So true, 'they are left with attempts to smear the messenger and ludicrous protests that the
sabrina 1
May 2014
#358
Totally agree. Like so many others (!) I was snookered by the wonderful Obama rhetoric in 2007.
Peregrine Took
May 2014
#315
Obama has made terrible decisions in his appointments. This is a big country.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#99
He's not a king! But....which US Presidents were kings? Yet, they got big things done.
merrily
May 2014
#381
Sorry. I thought the veterans and especially the old school Dems were all familiar with my politics
Doctor_J
May 2014
#297
Any guess what that "D" stands for??? I know he hangs around with Christian Dominionists, but that'd
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#225
With one exception, every item listed in the OP is the result of one of Obama's appointments
JDPriestly
May 2014
#124
Baloney. No asked him to reverse 200 years of problems. And it's a meme that a liberal cant get to
merrily
May 2014
#363
Because the other would have been worse, the worst shit from our guy is the new norm.
Ed Suspicious
May 2014
#66
Nope. Pushing to fast-track TPP is not a failing of 200 year old policy. TPP is a today policy and
Ed Suspicious
May 2014
#88
Was the existence of Blue Dogs and filibusters a surprise to Senator/Candidate Obama?
merrily
May 2014
#379
Just keep taking everything he says and everything that happens in D.C. at face value.
merrily
May 2014
#384
We have too many parties, not too few. I think we have at least 23 parties to the left of Democrats,
merrily
May 2014
#366
That's really a desperate argument. You seem to intimate that we should accept anything
rhett o rick
May 2014
#90
Nonsense, I criticize Obama all the time, you are not looking at the big picture i am afraid
randys1
May 2014
#159
Yes, and the OP is going to cause the death of all that's good on earth and in heaven, too.
merrily
May 2014
#386
That is conjecture. We don't know what would have happened if Romney had won.
JDPriestly
May 2014
#121
Except I think woome actually put the OP list together herself, rather than copying and pasting.
merrily
May 2014
#377
So how about offering -- in a civil way -- some of those differing interpretations?
Armstead
May 2014
#86
Pick one. How about seeking immunity for telecom companies that hand over data?
randome
May 2014
#101
It's a slippery slope when you say corporations can ignore legal warrants, though.
randome
May 2014
#120
So, Immunity was needed because some prosecutor was going to charge the corporations with
merrily
May 2014
#378
Could you please elaborate on just what the "different light" might be on each point?
JDPriestly
May 2014
#130
Greenwald Effect? Do you mean Greenwald's being against cutting Social Security?
MannyGoldstein
May 2014
#196
I'm thinking that some of S&G's diehard supporters are starting to come to grips...
randome
May 2014
#219
It certainly signals a problem when lists of the President's own policies have that effect. nt
woo me with science
May 2014
#17
If he sits back and lets Comcast take over the Internet, and he'll be ahead of Clinton
Armstead
May 2014
#87
True -- Except the Kid Gloves and the Gifts to Big Banks and Wall St. since 2008 come close
Armstead
May 2014
#100
No one ever expects Democratic Presidents to be in that kind of competition. Also,
merrily
May 2014
#364
So true. But these young'uns can't remember Eisenhower and did not learn about him
JDPriestly
May 2014
#134
Source? I wouldn't be surprised by this news, but I need to see a link to the source
Maedhros
May 2014
#59
You forgot the Walmart photo-op. Also another one popped up today. in Geithner's new book
Doctor_J
May 2014
#21
Thank you for one of the few posts on this thread that shows knowledge of civics. I see the OP
msanthrope
May 2014
#49
It was actually Leahy who returned to teh practice of blue slipping nominees, not Reid.
MohRokTah
May 2014
#80
The President sends the budget to Congress, though. Yes, they say yea or nay, but
merrily
May 2014
#361
I don't agree. The very first budget he sent to Congress cut fuel subsidies for the poor.
merrily
May 2014
#368
absolutely... considering that jeff47's excellent post upthread remains unchallenged
msanthrope
May 2014
#115
Well, it could be subjective & misleading. I know I left out a lot of important stories you posted.
woo me with science
May 2014
#47
oh, man! you are wound up! I wasn't trying to reargue all of the old news you posted
bigtree
May 2014
#162
Lots of negative adjectives there, but you still haven't supported your contention
woo me with science
May 2014
#164
Bill Clinton will never be held responsible. Only the black dude in the WH will.
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#51
We should have more DU meetups so maybe you wouldn't have such a poor opinion of your fellows.
randome
May 2014
#160
Yes. Simply amazing. Such a prediction. I'm going to ask for some lottery numbers.
Enthusiast
May 2014
#137
Who was called a racist? Is someone guilty of something? The fact that you thought
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#182
Yeah because I called people racist! Yeah, that's what I did. Yeah, o.k.
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#228
Nah. What I've seen are excuses from the Left. I've seen double standards all around.
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#227
We are still reaping the effects of those horrible Bush-Clinton-Bush policies, but I
Liberal_Stalwart71
May 2014
#406
To bad we have to spend so much effort watching and fighting the guy we voted for twice.
pa28
May 2014
#62
That's the approach, ad hominem attacks. I think it's a "politically liberal" trait if not
rhett o rick
May 2014
#92
I think it's odd behavior for posters that call themselves "politically liberal" to
rhett o rick
May 2014
#122
nope just surprised because I have never seen her support a democratic nominee. nr
arely staircase
May 2014
#409
Yeah. Pukes would be angry with President Obama for pushing a right wing agenda.
Enthusiast
May 2014
#140
What I'm saying, is that we shouldn't be this hard on President Obama.
Rhymes With Orange
May 2014
#161
Pukes wanted a public option and stricter bank regulation? In what alternate universe? n/t
eridani
May 2014
#248
I was responding to the poster who thought the OP sounded just like a Republican opinion piece
eridani
May 2014
#367
The fundamental flaw in the so-called reasoning of Administration apologists is this:
Maedhros
May 2014
#113
Yep. And we're stuck with it; more reason to make sure another Third Way corporatist does not
Zorra
May 2014
#145
What good does it do to elect Democrats if they don't legislate in our favor?
Maedhros
May 2014
#179
I can't express how offensive and dishonest I find that argument, too.
woo me with science
May 2014
#240
I am supporting progressive Democrats and letting the Blue Dogs go sit with their Republican
rhett o rick
May 2014
#172
People that arent liberal enough are Republicans. Some of them pretend to be Democrats, but vote
rhett o rick
May 2014
#204
So you are claiming to be liberal (or progressive) but you favor "free trade", the TPP and NAFTA?
rhett o rick
May 2014
#304
So you are saying that the TPP, unlike NAFTA and the other "Free" trade agreements, wont
rhett o rick
May 2014
#333
In Massachusetts, I am okay with Warren and Markey, as well as with Lynch (seems to have
merrily
May 2014
#360
But, but, but you wouldnt not vote or vote in a manner that would allow a repub
randys1
May 2014
#401
It looks to me like we are being manipulated. The wealthy oligarchs use their
rhett o rick
May 2014
#403
he had a democratic Congress for the first couple years..we saw how that worked out..nt
xiamiam
May 2014
#202
If it's any consolation, I agree with that, even though I was mocked by people
merrily
May 2014
#352
First of all I originaly wasn't talking to you and I can't help it that you don't get the sarcasm...
L0oniX
May 2014
#329
+1,000. Truly, Inconvenient Truths about this foul legislating. The GOP must be doing cartwheels,
blkmusclmachine
May 2014
#220
That is no doubt true of some. But some of the the exchanges I read here are so incredible
merrily
May 2014
#385
I've seen DUers say that he is the most liberal President in their lifetime.
progressoid
May 2014
#271
If one is 60 years old, then they have lived through the administrations of
Art_from_Ark
May 2014
#369
Even President Obama openly admits his policies are 1980s Moderate Republican (Reagan Era).
bvar22
May 2014
#321
Nope. Not even a little backwards. Your posted that you were directing your comments to
merrily
May 2014
#395
Libertarian alert. No thanks, You Libertarians can have your, both parties are the same lie.
Todays_Illusion
May 2014
#278
That's the new critique of criticism from the left here: you don't agree with everything Obama
neverforget
May 2014
#346
The campaign to conquer and divide liberals is now full blown. However, I will support
mfcorey1
May 2014
#336
Well over 100,000 mercenaries being paid by tax dollars in Afghanistan
woo me with science
May 2014
#337
You know, the very first time someone tried to label me as a "Right Winger" at DU,
woo me with science
May 2014
#344
Funny how trying to keep Obama's feet to the fire is now a right wing or libertarian criticism
neverforget
May 2014
#347