Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Porn. Rape? [View all]gollygee
(22,336 posts)53. A post of yours I agree with!
If rape kits would be investigated rather than allowed to sit on shelves for years on end, and if rapists would be charged and convicted and given reasonable sentences, I agree it would make a difference.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
182 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
if anything, stats on reporting should have gone up even if the actual number stayed the same
yurbud
May 2014
#12
neither of the charts account for recent increase in pirates off the African coast
maggiesfarmer
May 2014
#163
Maybe you should leave the stats explanations to people who know the first thing about statistics.
DanTex
May 2014
#58
Can you name a few instances with there's causation, but very strong observed anticorrelation?
MannyGoldstein
May 2014
#65
You'd better tell the American Medical Association that they're wrong, and quick!
MannyGoldstein
May 2014
#73
Sure, that's fine, but the increased mortality even shows up using BMI, evidently.
DanTex
May 2014
#93
The population-level correlation is actually very large. Did you look at those charts?
DanTex
May 2014
#114
Except he never claimed it was causing a decrease in rapes. Also you just used the P word wrong.
Kurska
May 2014
#95
Umm, measured correlations hardly ever come out to exactly 0, causation or not.
DanTex
May 2014
#125
You've had statistics courses? Hmm. I guess you didn't get far enough to cover "correlation".
DanTex
May 2014
#130
No it doesn't hinge on a "choice" of definition. It's *the* definition of correlation.
DanTex
May 2014
#128
A correlation is a precisely defined bivariate statistic, it's not some vague term.
DanTex
May 2014
#166
That's true, but does/did anyone really believe that porn is the primary cause of rape?
DanTex
May 2014
#153
There's no conclusive proof either way, there's basically 2 schools of thought...
Hippo_Tron
May 2014
#10
I was on the jury; here are the results: I hope whoever alerted will read these comments.
CaliforniaPeggy
May 2014
#14
I thought the comments weren't hateful, but rather more full of empathy for the alerter.
CaliforniaPeggy
May 2014
#31
When people want an example of how the alert system is used to try to silence opposing viewpoints,
hughee99
May 2014
#142
However, the incidents of eye-strain and heavy breathing have gone up.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2014
#18
There was a thread yesterday where porn was called out as a cause of sexual violence
MannyGoldstein
May 2014
#157
And, instead of contributing your deep research to THAT thread, you decided to make one of your own!
MADem
May 2014
#170
I have no idea whether porn causes rape, but this doesn't prove or disprove anything.
DanTex
May 2014
#55
Porn watching might -- MIGHT -- lower rape, but I don't consider porn watchers feminists.
ancianita
May 2014
#111
What part of the male performer is worth 60% to 84% less than the female performer?
Orrex
May 2014
#162
Overall the violent stats are down by a similar amount, my guess is there is something bigger at
bettyellen
May 2014
#129
I get it. You are showing how politicians use statistics to back up their "personal" beliefs. nt.
NCTraveler
May 2014
#144