Amanda Knox: I did not kill my friend

[pnwmom]

15. Then think about this: the first appeals court found Amanda and Raffaele INNOCENT.

Not just "not guilty." Judge Hellman ruled that there was "no evidence" that they had done the crime.

Isn't that -- in and of itself -- enough reason to provide reasonable doubt for any future trial?

Also, think of this:

In the small, bloody murder room, there wasn't a trace of evidence belonging to Amanda: not a single trace of DNA, or fingerprint, hair, fiber, shoe print -- not anything. Also, there wasn't any trace of Amanda on Meredith's body or clothes; and there wasn't any trace of Meredith on Amanda's body or clothes.

On the other hand, Rudy Guede left his DNA inside Meredith's vagina and on her body and clothing; his palm print on her pillow; his DNA on her purse and his shoe prints on the floor. Not to mention his feces in the toilet.

The prosecution claimed that Amanda and Raffaele magically cleaned all their own invisible DNA and fingerprints from Meredith's bedroom, leaving only Guede's -- which anyone with a brain knows would be impossible.