Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
98. If you're interested
Sun Apr 27, 2014, 02:40 PM
Apr 2014

in acknowledging instead of denying the facts, here:

Public Citizen, a public interest nonprofit organization representing more than 250,000 members and supporters nationwide, hereby petitions the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”) and the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the “Council”) to recognize that the Bank of America Corporation (“Bank of America” or “the bank”) poses a “grave threat” to the stability of the United States financial system and to mitigate that threat, as provided by section 121 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act” or the “Act”). 1 Pursuant to the authority in the Act, the Board and the Council should reform Bank of America into one or more institutions that are smaller, less interconnected, less complex, more manageable and, as a result, less systemically dangerous.

Under section 121 of the Dodd-Frank Act, if the Board determines that a financial institution poses a “grave threat” to U.S. financial stability, then the Board, with approval from the Council, “shall” mitigate that threat.2 The Act offers regulators the flexibility to take a range of actions, including limiting the institution’s mergers and acquisitions, restricting or imposing conditions on its products or activities, or ordering it to divest assets or off-balance sheet items.

- more -

http://www.citizen.org/documents/Public-Citizen-Bank-of-America-Petition.pdf


Orderly Liquidation Fund

To the extent that the Act expanded the scope of financial firms that may be liquidated by the federal government, beyond the existing authorities of the FDIC and SIPC, there needed to be an additional source of funds, independent of the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund, to be used in case of a non-bank or non-security financial company's liquidation. The Orderly Liquidation Fund is to be an FDIC-managed fund, to be used by the FDIC in the event of a covered financial company's liquidation[75] that is not covered by FDIC or SIPC.[76]

Initially, the Fund is to be capitalized over a period no shorter than five years, but no longer than ten; however, in the event the FDIC must make use of the Fund before it is fully capitalized, the Secretary of the Treasury and the FDIC are permitted to extend the period as determined necessary.[36] The method of capitalization is by collecting risk-based assessment fees on any "eligible financial company" – which is defined as "[…] any bank holding company with total consolidated assets equal to or greater than $50 billion and any nonbank financial company supervised by the Board of Governors." The severity of the assessment fees can be adjusted on an as-needed basis (depending on economic conditions and other similar factors) and the relative size and value of a firm is to play a role in determining the fees to be assessed.[36] The eligibility of a financial company to be subject to the fees is periodically reevaluated; or, in other words, a company that does not qualify for fees in the present, will be subject to the fees in the future if they cross the 50 billion line, or become subject to Federal Reserve scrutiny.[36]

To the extent that a covered financial company has a negative net worth and its liquidation creates an obligation to the FDIC as its liquidator, the FDIC shall charge one or more risk-based assessment such that the obligation will be paid off within 60 months (5 years) of the issuance of the obligation.[77] The assessments will be charged to any bank holding company with consolidated assets greater than $50 billion and any nonbank financial company supervised by the Federal Reserve. Under certain conditions, the assessment may be extended to regulated banks and other financial institutions.[78] Assessments are imposed on a graduated basis, with financial companies having greater assets and risk being assessed at a higher rate.[79]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodd%E2%80%93Frank_Wall_Street_Reform_and_Consumer_Protection_Act#Title_II_.E2.80.93_Orderly_Liquidation_Authority


Occupy the SEC Submits Letters to FDIC Regarding its Proposed Implementation of Too Big to Fail Regulations Under Title II of the Dodd Frank Act

New York, NY – March 26, 2014

Occupy the SEC (“OSEC”) has submitted a letter to the FDIC regarding that agency’s proposed regulations implementing Title II of the Dodd Frank Act (“DFA”). Title II of the DFA contains vital provisions that, if properly implemented, would help address the troublesome risks presented by “Too Big to Fail” (“TBTF”) financial institutions.

- more-

http://www.occupythesec.org/files/SIFI_Press_Release.pdf


Occupy the SEC Submits Comment Letter to Federal Reserve Board of Governors in Response to its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Risky & Anticompetitive Physical Commodities Transactions

New York, NY - March 29, 2014

Occupy the SEC (“OSEC”) has submitted a letter to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (“Board”) in response to that agency’s advance notice of proposed rulemaking (“ANPR”) regarding the range of activities that banks are permitted to engage in in the commodities arena. The ANPR is extremely timely because of recent abuses by banks in the commodities markets, especially because such abuses have been both egregious and unpunished.

The Board now has the opportunity to reinstate the historical separation in American law between financial and commercial activities, which previously kept banks from becoming Too Big to Fail and overwhelming the economy. The Board can pass regulations that prohibit institutions receiving federal depository insurance and implicit federal guarantees from acting in ways that threaten environmental pollution and risk systematic financial contagion. The agency has the power to limit or mitigate the speculation in physical commodities and derivatives markets that has created artificial scarcity in products such as wheat and oil on which billions of people—and governments—are reliant.

- more -

http://www.occupythesec.org/files/OSEC_Commodities_Press_Release.pdf
Telecommunications Reform Act signed on February 8, 1996. Faux News begins October 7, 1996. Hmm..nt Mnemosyne Apr 2014 #1
It's no coincidence. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #5
The first 'episode' I watched chilled me to the bone and have rarely watched it since 1996. Mnemosyne Apr 2014 #8
Can you explain on how the 1996 Act had anything to do with Fox News? onenote Apr 2014 #21
It didn't specifically. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #45
Not their existance, but the extent to which the owner has expanded his power Armstead Apr 2014 #51
This is going to be much worse nt Ex Lurker Apr 2014 #2
Our owners hate us for our freedom. scarletwoman Apr 2014 #3
...and ability to reason. Octafish Apr 2014 #52
They want our wealth. It's not personal, it's just business. rhett o rick Apr 2014 #74
We cannot allow this. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #4
The end result is that speech is silenced not directly by the government (too obvious a violation JDPriestly Apr 2014 #6
It's interesting that John McCain joined Russ Feingold in voting against this crappy bill cascadiance Apr 2014 #61
Right now, there is only one way to enable ourselves at the expense of truedelphi Apr 2014 #104
^^^This! 1000+!^^^ 2banon Apr 2014 #110
The "Primary Purpose of Environmental Regulations is the Regulating Environmentalist" 2banon Apr 2014 #111
The main (and major) item we all are working on is truedelphi Apr 2014 #113
that's great, which county are you living/working on? 2banon Apr 2014 #115
A big hello to you too. truedelphi Apr 2014 #118
Thanks, I'll have a looksie.. 2banon Apr 2014 #121
Just one more notch on the gun defacto7 Apr 2014 #7
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2014 #9
And who would have imagined a Democratic president would go along with this. And Obama quinnox Apr 2014 #10
Who would have imagined? pscot Apr 2014 #16
+1 villager Apr 2014 #27
+2 840high Apr 2014 #33
THANK YOU Skittles Apr 2014 #43
Here. bvar22 Apr 2014 #78
He talks a great game...but he sure doesn't walk his talk when it comes to taming Corporate America Armstead Apr 2014 #25
It's only because he can't find his "comfortable pair of shoes" cui bono Apr 2014 #29
But but but snot Apr 2014 #42
That is the problem with the Republicans disguised as "Democrats". bvar22 Apr 2014 #11
Yep. Clinton did some real boneheaded things, of which this (the communications act) was one. silvershadow Apr 2014 #18
+1! snot Apr 2014 #41
Electing Hillary would effectively give the Clintons a THIRD presidential term. Divernan Apr 2014 #48
^^This^^ 99Forever Apr 2014 #81
When the Net is taken over, what are a few of the first ballyhoo Apr 2014 #12
No. It will just slooooooooowwwwwwwww down Armstead Apr 2014 #17
Okay. Thanks. ballyhoo Apr 2014 #34
Well, a lot of DU is pretty "slow" already. cui bono Apr 2014 #90
Yup nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #13
These companies shouldn't have been allowed to get so big in the first place Armstead Apr 2014 #19
One qualifier, oligarchy nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #20
One Oligarchy -- Two Divisions (Brands) of It Armstead Apr 2014 #22
I hope to some day see it greatly diminished nadinbrzezinski Apr 2014 #23
Me too -- I wish this damn country would recognize the common sense rule that... Armstead Apr 2014 #24
Seconding that. snot Apr 2014 #40
We're not obxhead Apr 2014 #14
DURec leftstreet Apr 2014 #15
I'm waiting for the Pros with their Blueline Special posts to come Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #26
Why do you love Putin!? villager Apr 2014 #28
Well nothing has happened yet so how can you be against it? cui bono Apr 2014 #30
"Bu..bu..but he had no choice!" Jake Stern Apr 2014 #31
It's just an N-dimensional chess move, Jackpine Radical Apr 2014 #32
ssshhhhhhh.....This is all the Republicans fault Armstead Apr 2014 #35
It's all Republican obstructionism. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #46
That's half the problem -- the other half is us, by not standing firm Armstead Apr 2014 #50
I was only kidding but you have a great answer nonetheless. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #53
I've been holding on to that one for while Armstead Apr 2014 #54
"Can't get anything done except for stuff we don't want." CrispyQ Apr 2014 #63
Yes, it feels so wonderfully satisfying. Enthusiast Apr 2014 #66
To paraphrase Bill Clinton... Armstead Apr 2014 #117
Same old shit they pulled when Clinton fucked us over Armstead Apr 2014 #36
"The adults know best. " ProSense Apr 2014 #56
The "adults' are the people in power (or their apologists) who keep screwing us over but who.... Armstead Apr 2014 #57
Do you ProSense Apr 2014 #65
I know exactly what I'm talking about Armstead Apr 2014 #69
Frankly, ProSense Apr 2014 #70
Your faith in them is touching Armstead Apr 2014 #71
Your inability to refute the point is telling. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #72
What, they pass a law, it allows banks to continue to stay too big and get bigger.... Armstead Apr 2014 #73
More ProSense Apr 2014 #75
We'll see in five or ten years Armstead Apr 2014 #76
We don't need to wait 5 years. bvar22 Apr 2014 #82
O,o,o...you just don'tknowwhatyou'retalkingabout, huff puff Armstead Apr 2014 #84
Yes. I know. bvar22 Apr 2014 #86
You're ProSense Apr 2014 #89
Oh... so they caught some small fry? bvar22 Apr 2014 #93
First ProSense Apr 2014 #94
I KNEW you couldn't do it, Pro. bvar22 Apr 2014 #96
Translation: I'm just going to ignore what you posted, Pro. ProSense Apr 2014 #97
If you're interested ProSense Apr 2014 #98
You have yet to make any point regarding the topic of this OP. cui bono Apr 2014 #88
Why would Centrist Dems bite the Corporate Hand that feeds them? HooptieWagon Apr 2014 #83
"the opposition party tears into their opponent: everything he does is thus marvelous MisterP Apr 2014 #38
How insulting ProSense Apr 2014 #55
Don't Mischararacterie my post Armstead Apr 2014 #58
"I included your precious Obama in there" ProSense Apr 2014 #59
Bill Clinton proudly signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Efilroft Sul Apr 2014 #60
Bill Clinton repealed Glass Steagall and "proudly" signed DADT and DOMA into law. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #62
Instead of simply attacking everyone who comes here to express displeasure over NorthCarolina Apr 2014 #77
Hilarious ProSense Apr 2014 #80
Not Hilarious Armstead Apr 2014 #92
Funny thing is, they're putting themselves out of work. /nt Marr Apr 2014 #119
FCC Supports: Separate but Neutral n/t gmoles Apr 2014 #37
K&R'd! snot Apr 2014 #39
What alternative realistic response did he have to the Federal Court decision pnwmom Apr 2014 #44
Because the WH and Congress could reclassify and/or find ways to regulate it in the public interest Armstead Apr 2014 #49
CONGRESS. That is the answer. Congress needs to pass legislation, pnwmom Apr 2014 #99
How badly would we expect this to depress the midterm turnout? Enthusiast Apr 2014 #47
Reclassification Is Not a Dirty Word ProSense Apr 2014 #64
Neither is "Absurd Rationalization" LanternWaste Apr 2014 #120
They learned from 2008 n2doc Apr 2014 #67
"Nothing to lose at all." CrispyQ Apr 2014 #68
Actually, Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 on February 8, 1996. Efilroft Sul Apr 2014 #79
Yes I forsee a lucrative career as a corporate "advisor" and speaker ahead for President Obama Armstead Apr 2014 #85
OK, so the ownership of the airwaves are in too few hands... Blanks Apr 2014 #87
I profoundly but respectfully beg to differ Armstead Apr 2014 #91
Do you disagree with... Blanks Apr 2014 #100
Pretty much everything you said and the way you cast it. Armstead Apr 2014 #101
Thanks, Obama. blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #95
100% agree benld74 Apr 2014 #102
I read this and never understand what the personal implications will be. Someone pretend you are jwirr Apr 2014 #103
You want to visit a website oprated by a Big Media oulet.... Armstead Apr 2014 #109
Thank you. That makes it a personal issue. I think my congress reps are against this: Franken, Amy K jwirr Apr 2014 #116
knr Douglas Carpenter Apr 2014 #105
The death of the Liberal Media. tecelote Apr 2014 #106
And don't forget: In the first place, the airwaves on which the radio and TV stations JDPriestly Apr 2014 #107
All for the privilege of voting for Hillary. Katashi_itto Apr 2014 #108
K&R pscot Apr 2014 #112
Command, Control, Consolidate... Octafish Apr 2014 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Obama's FCC is about...»Reply #98