Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What troubles me most about a Hillary Clinton Presidency, is foreign policy [View all]cali
(114,904 posts)6. Oh, I agree with you that the SCOTUS is vitally important
but I couldn't disagree with you more about the "women are different when it comes to war" stuff.
Nor do I trust Hillary with judicial appointments. not at all. she is a corporate creature.
Sh voted for the IWR our of sheer political opportunism or hawkishness that took precedence over FACTS.
I wouldn't dream of voting for her in the primary. I think she'll be a fucking disaster as a president- not as bad as a repuke, but man...
yes, I'll hold my noise and vote for her if she's the nominee.
I
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What troubles me most about a Hillary Clinton Presidency, is foreign policy [View all]
cali
Mar 2014
OP
A hawkish stance in D.C. toward Iran only emboldens the hawks in Teheran. K&R.
Democracyinkind
Mar 2014
#1
Yes, because allowing them to continue with their nuclear plans is a good option.
Beacool
Mar 2014
#66
So you're willing to accept a Republican President resetting the Court are you ?
Trust Buster
Mar 2014
#7
cali stated unambiguously that if Clinton is the nominee she will vote for her.
11 Bravo
Mar 2014
#65
At some point we must stop "settling" for the lesser of evils. The middle class can not survive
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#25
''I think a women's mentality is quite different than that of a man with regards to matters of war.'
Whisp
Mar 2014
#97
I wish Hillary was the right candidate. She would win easily. But she is wrong for the nation.
Enthusiast
Mar 2014
#16
seeing as it's only Hillary that is supposedly running now, of course the numbers will be with her
Whisp
Mar 2014
#99
Hello, nationalize the fed. While I was typing my respnse to the OP (below)...
truth2power
Mar 2014
#24
so the fuck what. as if she hasn't supported monsters. as if the U.S. hasn't supported
cali
Mar 2014
#81
We need to worry about both. It is not too soon to try to derail the Clinton-Sachs train. nm
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#27
if she is, I'll show up at the polls to vote down the ballot, but I'll leave that one unmarked.
2banon
Mar 2014
#102
In 2002 Bush/Cheney were blatantly lying to get us in a war. Anyone with half
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#38
Absolutism has always been a losing proposition in the political arena....
Trust Buster
Mar 2014
#40
I am not sure if you are calling me an extremists or not and it isnt a fact that
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#42
Well I didnt miss it. I was there. Hundreds of thousands marched in protest in cities like NY
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#45
Oh for fucks, sake. 21 dems in the senate voted against the IWR. go educate yourself
cali
Mar 2014
#82
What troubles me about a Hilary Clinton presidency is the fact that nothing will change.
Vashta Nerada
Mar 2014
#50
Will she be wearing cowboy boots at her inauguration and saying "Mission Accomplished"?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2014
#52
plus don't forget her blatant unwillingness to apologize for the vote for war on Iraq in 2008
Victor_c3
Mar 2014
#86