General Discussion

moondust

(20,042 posts)

62. It's apparently not online.

Thu Mar 13, 2014, 08:32 PM

Mar 2014

Last edited Fri Mar 14, 2014, 12:34 AM - Edit history (2)

I've searched for both English and Russian text to no avail, and it would be in Russian and possibly Ukrainian languages anyway. Maybe a little too old to make it into the Slavic cyber age.

These "selected articles" are the result of "the heroic efforts of the University of Chicago law librarian, Lyonette Louis-Jacques" according to the Eric Posner site.

Edit: Actually, it looks like the Posner site has a link to the treaty itself housed on the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation web site but the document has been deleted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia Allowed To Have 25,000 Troops In Crimea Since 1999... & Other Facts You May Not Know [View all] Purveyor Mar 2014 OP

This is rt.com crap. they're not allowed to leave their bases. what a dishonest piece of agitprop. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #1

Can you link to this provision that they are not allowed to 'leave their bases'? Purveyor Mar 2014 #2

Same reason if you rent an apartment you're not allowed to knock down geek tragedy Mar 2014 #9

Thank you Purveyor for posting this. nt snappyturtle Mar 2014 #13

It appears you have fled this thread much like your champion Yanukovych fled Ukraine. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #29

Thank you, moon, et al for disproving this pro-putin propaganda LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #117

"Now scurry on over to Faux Knews, a trusted source to you I'm sure, for the citation." Cha Mar 2014 #55

And you prefer CNN or Faux? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #39

Yes, I do prefer CNN to the Russian government. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #57

The Problem, Sir, Is They Are Not Supposed To Go Off the Bases Without Permission The Magistrate Mar 2014 #3

Can you submit this 'treaty' for all of us here to peruse? I would love to see it. eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #4

Don't Try And Teach Grampa To Suck Eggs, Son.... The Magistrate Mar 2014 #5

Nice 'non-answer' but not surprised in the least. Carry on with your drivel...SIR. em Purveyor Mar 2014 #7

Keep Digging Your Hole, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #10

Nor I and by the way, I always use a long handled shovel, you? eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #12

The Handle On Your Spoon, Sir, Is Not Long Enough To Sup With The Devil The Magistrate Mar 2014 #17

Here are your hindquarters, sir, hand-delivered with greatest respect geek tragedy Mar 2014 #27

Please read 8.2. n/t moondust Mar 2014 #30

LOL. eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #35

? nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #59

Sorry. moondust Mar 2014 #64

Do you have the text of the treaty to verify 25k troops? joshcryer Mar 2014 #15

Maybe this: moondust Mar 2014 #21

Thank you! Obvious treaties would not allow occupation. joshcryer Mar 2014 #24

'Invasion' ..... in, like Iraq? polly7 Mar 2014 #6

Words Convey Meanings, Ma'am, And One Should Use Them Accurately The Magistrate Mar 2014 #8

I'm free to support people who don't want to live under a newly 'selected' fascist polly7 Mar 2014 #14

If You Don't Support The Right Fascist, Ma'am, The Wrong Fascist Might Be The Ruler The Magistrate Mar 2014 #18

It's not who you or 'I' support (I don't 'support' any fascist, apparently you have no polly7 Mar 2014 #23

By Endorsing Russia's Imperialist Endeavor, Ma'am, You Are Supporting A Fascist The Magistrate Mar 2014 #25

And you are resorting to the same old 'you just love Hussein'! bullshit that was so popular polly7 Mar 2014 #28

One would have thought that old 'playbook' would have been revised by now, indeed. Purveyor Mar 2014 #31

Indeed. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #33

I Am Pointing Out Which Side You Are Supporting, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #32

Don't tell me who I'm aligning myself with. polly7 Mar 2014 #36

You Tell Everyone Who Who You Align With, Ma'am, By Standing Beside Them The Magistrate Mar 2014 #38

The only one lying here ......... polly7 Mar 2014 #42

I Do Not Think That Word Means Quite What You Think It Does, Ma'am, In This Context The Magistrate Mar 2014 #44

Then, I nailed it! polly7 Mar 2014 #45

Again, Ma'am, The Word Does Not Mean What You Seem To Think It Does The Magistrate Mar 2014 #61

Boring, twist and spin from someone who supports polly7 Mar 2014 #66

You Cannot Wriggle Free Of Your Own Stand, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #71

Sorry, recycling a lie doesn't make it truth, no matter how many polly7 Mar 2014 #72

Someone Alerted On One Of Your Posts Addressed To Me, Ma'am? The Magistrate Mar 2014 #73

Inside info, eh...Magi? What great forum power you wield...SIR. I bow Purveyor Mar 2014 #75

You Might Want To Actually Read What You Are Commenting On, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #76

I adore The Onion! polly7 Mar 2014 #78

My Ignorance Is Legend, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #79

Cool. Better work on that. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #82

Happy To Keep This Kicked Up Top, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #86

I imagine so! polly7 Mar 2014 #95

Kick! joshcryer Mar 2014 #98

Some Questions Answer Themselves, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #101

So you insist on the right to call someone what they've asked you not to ... more than once? polly7 Mar 2014 #112

Thank You For Putting This Back Up Top, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #113

Awww .... a teeny, tiny little board bully. polly7 Mar 2014 #114

Glad I Can Count On Your Assistance, Ma'am, To Keep this Up Near the Top The Magistrate Mar 2014 #115

Alexander Dugin joshcryer Mar 2014 #20

Thanks Magistrate... fascisthunter Mar 2014 #16

When did they ask for help? joshcryer Mar 2014 #11

........ polly7 Mar 2014 #19

So after Yanukovych was ousted. joshcryer Mar 2014 #22

Hilarious! coming from someone who screamed for the polly7 Mar 2014 #26

There were not occupying forces there. joshcryer Mar 2014 #34

lmfao. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #37

A few days ago, there was allegedly no support for Putin ProSense Mar 2014 #50

The Hard-Core, Ma'am, Is Nothing If Not Flexible.... The Magistrate Mar 2014 #63

Well said. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #67

Someone should kick cali's thread. joshcryer Mar 2014 #100

Your OP brought out the NeoCon Democrats. It's like Iraq all over again. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #40

Oh, you Hussein lover, you! nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #43

...the OP is pro-occupation. joshcryer Mar 2014 #49

Maybe if you give us a quote. I read the OP as anti-Neocon. Just like those that were against the rhett o rick Mar 2014 #80

Neocons are salivating at Putin's actions. joshcryer Mar 2014 #81

That, and they're badgering Obama to threaten military action geek tragedy Mar 2014 #85

That's basically it in a nutshell. joshcryer Mar 2014 #89

William Kristol is not calling Putin a great leader. The neocons want war. They, as always, claim rhett o rick Mar 2014 #88

You are peddling Russian propaganda geek tragedy Mar 2014 #92

I said that Neocons want war. Is that "Russian propaganda"? Do you want war? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #96

Russia has already entered war. joshcryer Mar 2014 #99

So you agree with Dick Cheney that we should consider military action? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #102

No. joshcryer Mar 2014 #106

No one in this thread is calling for war, yet you broke out the 'neocon' smear against geek tragedy Mar 2014 #105

Disagree with Putin = pro-war. joshcryer Mar 2014 #111

Most cons are praising Putin. joshcryer Mar 2014 #93

William Kristol and Dick Cheney want war. Do you agree with them? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #103

No. joshcryer Mar 2014 #107

Many of the cons are authoritarians, and Putin is the ultimate authoritarian leader. amandabeech Mar 2014 #104

They hate Obama but admire fascist Putin. joshcryer Mar 2014 #108

They're just insane. amandabeech Mar 2014 #109

McCain is only flaming that shit, too. joshcryer Mar 2014 #110

No, it brought out those who don't lap geek tragedy Mar 2014 #60

This isnt about what Putin says. This is about those beating the war drums. rhett o rick Mar 2014 #83

You are falsely equating criticism of Putin's highly illegal armed geek tragedy Mar 2014 #90

Right, because we're the ones defending an invasion based on trumped up pretext. NuclearDem Mar 2014 #77

Rec'd because inconvenient facts trip up neoliberals every fucking time Catherina Mar 2014 #41

Remember Iraq and Al Jazeera, Catherina? polly7 Mar 2014 #48

It's too sad. Their hate machine only has one template with a blank spot for the country Catherina Mar 2014 #56

I gave polly7 the text saying they couldn't leave the designated areas a week ago muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #68

pampango makes important points about no insignia. joshcryer Mar 2014 #94

Here's the indisputable refutation of the pro-Occupation Putinistas and that laughable 'fact' sheet geek tragedy Mar 2014 #69

Analysis: Why Russia's Crimea move fails legal test ProSense Mar 2014 #46

Facts to fight propaganda.. how refreshing. thanks. Cha Mar 2014 #91

so what happened to the story that these weren't even Russian troops at all? 0rganism Mar 2014 #47

Post 21 debunks OP, btw. joshcryer Mar 2014 #51

This sloppy 'cut and paste'? LOL Purveyor Mar 2014 #52

Where does the treaty allow occupation? joshcryer Mar 2014 #53

Provide a link to the full said treaty. Selected articles of a treaty are suspicious to Purveyor Mar 2014 #54

Which articles? joshcryer Mar 2014 #58

It's apparently not online. moondust Mar 2014 #62

Google has it cached! joshcryer Mar 2014 #84

Spasibo. moondust Mar 2014 #87

No, they are not suspicious to many. They are inconvenient for those geek tragedy Mar 2014 #65

"Selected articles of a treaty are suspicious to many" - WTF do you think your OP is? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #70

The obvious reply is fairly short. Igel Mar 2014 #74

Ironically, the Treaty of Relations in Cuba allowed takeover. joshcryer Mar 2014 #97

We Were More Open About Our Purposes Back Then, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #116