General Discussion

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)

2. Can you link to this provision that they are not allowed to 'leave their bases'?

Reply to geek tragedy (Reply #1)

Thu Mar 13, 2014, 06:29 PM

Mar 2014

I would love to see it.

Now scurry on over to Faux Knews, a trusted source to you I'm sure, for the citation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

117 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia Allowed To Have 25,000 Troops In Crimea Since 1999... & Other Facts You May Not Know [View all] Purveyor Mar 2014 OP

This is rt.com crap. they're not allowed to leave their bases. what a dishonest piece of agitprop. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #1

Can you link to this provision that they are not allowed to 'leave their bases'? Purveyor Mar 2014 #2

Same reason if you rent an apartment you're not allowed to knock down geek tragedy Mar 2014 #9

Thank you Purveyor for posting this. nt snappyturtle Mar 2014 #13

It appears you have fled this thread much like your champion Yanukovych fled Ukraine. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #29

Thank you, moon, et al for disproving this pro-putin propaganda LostOne4Ever Mar 2014 #117

"Now scurry on over to Faux Knews, a trusted source to you I'm sure, for the citation." Cha Mar 2014 #55

And you prefer CNN or Faux? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #39

Yes, I do prefer CNN to the Russian government. geek tragedy Mar 2014 #57

The Problem, Sir, Is They Are Not Supposed To Go Off the Bases Without Permission The Magistrate Mar 2014 #3

Can you submit this 'treaty' for all of us here to peruse? I would love to see it. eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #4

Don't Try And Teach Grampa To Suck Eggs, Son.... The Magistrate Mar 2014 #5

Nice 'non-answer' but not surprised in the least. Carry on with your drivel...SIR. em Purveyor Mar 2014 #7

Keep Digging Your Hole, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #10

Nor I and by the way, I always use a long handled shovel, you? eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #12

The Handle On Your Spoon, Sir, Is Not Long Enough To Sup With The Devil The Magistrate Mar 2014 #17

Here are your hindquarters, sir, hand-delivered with greatest respect geek tragedy Mar 2014 #27

Please read 8.2. n/t moondust Mar 2014 #30

LOL. eom Purveyor Mar 2014 #35

? nt geek tragedy Mar 2014 #59

Sorry. moondust Mar 2014 #64

Do you have the text of the treaty to verify 25k troops? joshcryer Mar 2014 #15

Maybe this: moondust Mar 2014 #21

Thank you! Obvious treaties would not allow occupation. joshcryer Mar 2014 #24

'Invasion' ..... in, like Iraq? polly7 Mar 2014 #6

Words Convey Meanings, Ma'am, And One Should Use Them Accurately The Magistrate Mar 2014 #8

I'm free to support people who don't want to live under a newly 'selected' fascist polly7 Mar 2014 #14

If You Don't Support The Right Fascist, Ma'am, The Wrong Fascist Might Be The Ruler The Magistrate Mar 2014 #18

It's not who you or 'I' support (I don't 'support' any fascist, apparently you have no polly7 Mar 2014 #23

By Endorsing Russia's Imperialist Endeavor, Ma'am, You Are Supporting A Fascist The Magistrate Mar 2014 #25

And you are resorting to the same old 'you just love Hussein'! bullshit that was so popular polly7 Mar 2014 #28

One would have thought that old 'playbook' would have been revised by now, indeed. Purveyor Mar 2014 #31

Indeed. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #33

I Am Pointing Out Which Side You Are Supporting, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #32

Don't tell me who I'm aligning myself with. polly7 Mar 2014 #36

You Tell Everyone Who Who You Align With, Ma'am, By Standing Beside Them The Magistrate Mar 2014 #38

The only one lying here ......... polly7 Mar 2014 #42

I Do Not Think That Word Means Quite What You Think It Does, Ma'am, In This Context The Magistrate Mar 2014 #44

Then, I nailed it! polly7 Mar 2014 #45

Again, Ma'am, The Word Does Not Mean What You Seem To Think It Does The Magistrate Mar 2014 #61

Boring, twist and spin from someone who supports polly7 Mar 2014 #66

You Cannot Wriggle Free Of Your Own Stand, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #71

Sorry, recycling a lie doesn't make it truth, no matter how many polly7 Mar 2014 #72

Someone Alerted On One Of Your Posts Addressed To Me, Ma'am? The Magistrate Mar 2014 #73

Inside info, eh...Magi? What great forum power you wield...SIR. I bow Purveyor Mar 2014 #75

You Might Want To Actually Read What You Are Commenting On, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #76

I adore The Onion! polly7 Mar 2014 #78

My Ignorance Is Legend, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #79

Cool. Better work on that. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #82

Happy To Keep This Kicked Up Top, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #86

I imagine so! polly7 Mar 2014 #95

Kick! joshcryer Mar 2014 #98

Some Questions Answer Themselves, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #101

So you insist on the right to call someone what they've asked you not to ... more than once? polly7 Mar 2014 #112

Thank You For Putting This Back Up Top, Ma'am The Magistrate Mar 2014 #113

Awww .... a teeny, tiny little board bully. polly7 Mar 2014 #114

Glad I Can Count On Your Assistance, Ma'am, To Keep this Up Near the Top The Magistrate Mar 2014 #115

Alexander Dugin joshcryer Mar 2014 #20

Thanks Magistrate... fascisthunter Mar 2014 #16

When did they ask for help? joshcryer Mar 2014 #11

........ polly7 Mar 2014 #19

So after Yanukovych was ousted. joshcryer Mar 2014 #22

Hilarious! coming from someone who screamed for the polly7 Mar 2014 #26

There were not occupying forces there. joshcryer Mar 2014 #34

lmfao. nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #37

A few days ago, there was allegedly no support for Putin ProSense Mar 2014 #50

The Hard-Core, Ma'am, Is Nothing If Not Flexible.... The Magistrate Mar 2014 #63

Well said. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #67

Someone should kick cali's thread. joshcryer Mar 2014 #100

Your OP brought out the NeoCon Democrats. It's like Iraq all over again. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #40

Oh, you Hussein lover, you! nt. polly7 Mar 2014 #43

...the OP is pro-occupation. joshcryer Mar 2014 #49

Maybe if you give us a quote. I read the OP as anti-Neocon. Just like those that were against the rhett o rick Mar 2014 #80

Neocons are salivating at Putin's actions. joshcryer Mar 2014 #81

That, and they're badgering Obama to threaten military action geek tragedy Mar 2014 #85

That's basically it in a nutshell. joshcryer Mar 2014 #89

William Kristol is not calling Putin a great leader. The neocons want war. They, as always, claim rhett o rick Mar 2014 #88

You are peddling Russian propaganda geek tragedy Mar 2014 #92

I said that Neocons want war. Is that "Russian propaganda"? Do you want war? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #96

Russia has already entered war. joshcryer Mar 2014 #99

So you agree with Dick Cheney that we should consider military action? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #102

No. joshcryer Mar 2014 #106

No one in this thread is calling for war, yet you broke out the 'neocon' smear against geek tragedy Mar 2014 #105

Disagree with Putin = pro-war. joshcryer Mar 2014 #111

Most cons are praising Putin. joshcryer Mar 2014 #93

William Kristol and Dick Cheney want war. Do you agree with them? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #103

No. joshcryer Mar 2014 #107

Many of the cons are authoritarians, and Putin is the ultimate authoritarian leader. amandabeech Mar 2014 #104

They hate Obama but admire fascist Putin. joshcryer Mar 2014 #108

They're just insane. amandabeech Mar 2014 #109

McCain is only flaming that shit, too. joshcryer Mar 2014 #110

No, it brought out those who don't lap geek tragedy Mar 2014 #60

This isnt about what Putin says. This is about those beating the war drums. rhett o rick Mar 2014 #83

You are falsely equating criticism of Putin's highly illegal armed geek tragedy Mar 2014 #90

Right, because we're the ones defending an invasion based on trumped up pretext. NuclearDem Mar 2014 #77

Rec'd because inconvenient facts trip up neoliberals every fucking time Catherina Mar 2014 #41

Remember Iraq and Al Jazeera, Catherina? polly7 Mar 2014 #48

It's too sad. Their hate machine only has one template with a blank spot for the country Catherina Mar 2014 #56

I gave polly7 the text saying they couldn't leave the designated areas a week ago muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #68

pampango makes important points about no insignia. joshcryer Mar 2014 #94

Here's the indisputable refutation of the pro-Occupation Putinistas and that laughable 'fact' sheet geek tragedy Mar 2014 #69

Analysis: Why Russia's Crimea move fails legal test ProSense Mar 2014 #46

Facts to fight propaganda.. how refreshing. thanks. Cha Mar 2014 #91

so what happened to the story that these weren't even Russian troops at all? 0rganism Mar 2014 #47

Post 21 debunks OP, btw. joshcryer Mar 2014 #51

This sloppy 'cut and paste'? LOL Purveyor Mar 2014 #52

Where does the treaty allow occupation? joshcryer Mar 2014 #53

Provide a link to the full said treaty. Selected articles of a treaty are suspicious to Purveyor Mar 2014 #54

Which articles? joshcryer Mar 2014 #58

It's apparently not online. moondust Mar 2014 #62

Google has it cached! joshcryer Mar 2014 #84

Spasibo. moondust Mar 2014 #87

No, they are not suspicious to many. They are inconvenient for those geek tragedy Mar 2014 #65

"Selected articles of a treaty are suspicious to many" - WTF do you think your OP is? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #70

The obvious reply is fairly short. Igel Mar 2014 #74

Ironically, the Treaty of Relations in Cuba allowed takeover. joshcryer Mar 2014 #97

We Were More Open About Our Purposes Back Then, Sir The Magistrate Mar 2014 #116