General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Snowden: I Raised NSA Concerns Internally Over 10 Times Before Going Rogue - WaPo [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)Others seem to be saying, or implying, at least, that failure to produce proof when you are under no obligation so to do and may damage yourself if you do, means you have no proof.
He may or may not have a paper trail of who he discussed this with. Remember, this was secret info before he disclosed it. If he does, he is not in court, not under subpoena, nothing. He has literally less than zero reason to produce paperwork even if he created any.
Besides, if he created paperwork, would we trust it? If he is telling the truth, it's highly unlikely that the people he saw would have signed anything.
Until he gets into court, all this arguing about evidence and proof and paperwork is a lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing..
If he were in court, and had no paperwork, his sworn testimony would be evidence, even if he has no paperwork.