General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alan Grayson's Divorce issue. It just got sadder. There's video [View all]BainsBane
(53,166 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 6, 2014, 02:14 AM - Edit history (1)
which is sexist insult, you threw the barb. Not only that, you defended insults that he made for which he provided no proof, and in fact thanked him. It would seem that for you shrill means not deferring to my male betters and not speaking gently as women are meant to, even while men are insulting them.
You responded to a thread in which RC made a thinly veiled callout, series of accusations, and condemned my statement that I think anyone should be held accountable to the law regardless of party ID or who he is indicated to me that you agreed with RC that my statement was somehow objectionable. The opposite of that would be that the party ID or level of importance of an accused should matter, hence my conclusion about viewing Grayson as above the law. I would assume if you disagreed with that point, you would have said so. It seems a rather important point to overlook.
It also shows that you think women should comport themselves in ways you do not expect men to adhere to. So by all means, support RC in his cause to make GD safe for bikini threads and floating breasts in space. Support his efforts to drive "shrill" feminists like me from the site. Given your response in this subthread, it's clear we don't share any common values to work toward anyway. Besides, turning the clock back to 1962 takes a lot of work. They need all the help they can get.