Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
669. But that's not the issue. The issue is the objectification of women.
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 11:20 PM
Feb 2014

And the harm that these media images - which are airbrushed and photoshopped and give unrealistic "goals" for girls and young women.

Nothing wrong with a healthy sex drive and sexual attraction to whomever you are attracted to, but putting it out like this and ogling over the women in public is crass and rude and is objectifying women.

Again, rather than be defensive about it, why not just see that it bothers a lot of people and act accordingly, as a sensitive human being would do? If your female friends were in a room with you and you were ogling this cover and making comments out loud and they said it bothered them, would you not stop? Even if you aren't able to see the societal problem with it?

And regarding the societal problem, look up all the anorexia and bulimia that comes out of this media onslaught of these sorts of altered women's bodies cases. Do the search as "my friend ana" or "my friend mia". Those searches will get you to pages where females suffering from this talk about what they do and give advice to others on how to not gain weight and avoid eating food. There was a story I saw about a girl who was early teens who would eat paper to fill her up so she wouldn't be so hungry but was still not eating food that would put weight on her.

This sort of objectification contributes to that. As you are not a woman you won't be able to completely know what women go through and deal with, so perhaps you can take what they say into consideration and adjust your public behavior on behalf of their feelings. Have some sensitivity to it rather than be worried that you won't be able to have sexual desires. You can, there's just appropriate times and ways to express it. Imo, this is not one of them.

There was a time when people didn't realize that some varying degrees of racism/homophia were inappropriate or hurtful. As time goes on those views have evolved and changed. Sexism as well. Hopefully they all continue to change as more people become aware and evolve and decide to show some sensitivity to each group's plight.

As to your last paragraph. Do you believe that about racism and homophobia as well?

Nina Adgal is heavenly. nt onehandle Feb 2014 #1
She sure is! nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #3
All 3 of them are lovely. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #135
Dang. raven mad Feb 2014 #2
This issue is out next week; they debuted the cover yesterday. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #4
Sorry! I forgot the irony/sarcasm thingy - raven mad Feb 2014 #6
No worries. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #17
Outstanding. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #5
They all look the same to me. pangaia Feb 2014 #7
I want one with those three gorgeous American slopestyle skier dudes!! Happyhippychick Feb 2014 #8
I know!!! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #9
Athletic, gorgeous, and rescuing the Sochi stray dogs. Happyhippychick Feb 2014 #12
Just for you Happyhippychick Lochloosa Feb 2014 #195
Thank you ever so much! Is that a beautiful sight or what? Of course I could technically be their Happyhippychick Feb 2014 #199
Technically, heck! raven mad Feb 2014 #325
Love it! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #276
They all look like they have something wrong with their spines. panader0 Feb 2014 #10
They are just standing HappyMe Feb 2014 #13
They are posing for a picture. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #14
I don't think walking... cyberswede Feb 2014 #41
bingo. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #274
One thing that really sickens me is the fox news-like mendacity of some on this thread. redqueen Feb 2014 #280
Um, it seems to me you're the one distorting the issue. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #286
and advertising is just pictures... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #306
Want to explain why men are never posed like that mass media publications? pnwmom Feb 2014 #594
Pay them no mind LordGlenconner Feb 2014 #629
^ This AnalystInParadise Feb 2014 #689
mendacity...you can say that again. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #292
You seem tense. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #307
... opiate69 Feb 2014 #324
Shomer Shabbas. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #327
you too. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #357
Touched, I am.. opiate69 Feb 2014 #361
as you should be. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #368
so not my style... opiate69 Feb 2014 #371
oh I looove Jack Black! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #376
Yeah.. part of the problem with posting from work is, opiate69 Feb 2014 #381
You never saw The Big Lebowski? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #431
you're cute when you're dickish. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #356
It's tough being me. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #358
I'd guess so! sometimes it's tough watching you BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #363
A wise man once said, "They can't all be winners, can they, kid" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #364
kablooey. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #372
Should you find yourself flying on Halloween Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #378
not a problem BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #385
I knew it! Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #396
Perhaps they are discussing how modern understandings of biomechanics contribute struggle4progress Feb 2014 #670
Needs more curve and color Blue_Tires Feb 2014 #11
I prefer my women real Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #15
Did the Michael Sam cover bother you RiffRandell Feb 2014 #16
Sam wasn't on the cover almost completely naked was he? Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #23
exactly. I cant believe people applauding the Sams cover (rightly so) BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #29
What you just referred to those women as is DISGUSTING. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #37
It's at the core of what they're being used for. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #43
I think your choice of words is going to be a point of contention Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #115
+1. well said. and since you said, i dont have to. and i can stay out.... lol, nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #119
yeah....I sometimes can no longer stand to cover the truth in polite words. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #124
Right on, spot on and good for you! Cock tease is waaaaay to polite as far as I am concerned. Ninga Feb 2014 #186
or they just let all know.... "she will do...." seabeyond Feb 2014 #187
Yep. Ninga Feb 2014 #200
lol! good one! and, daily microinsults--yes, truly. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #202
Thank you sister! Stadiums, ball parks, bars, sidewalks, construction sites, fraternity houses, Ninga Feb 2014 #210
yep. work too. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #227
Oh, that's good. llmart Feb 2014 #311
Doesn't bother me at all LordGlenconner Feb 2014 #630
... OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #235
!!! OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #238
??? OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #246
yeah, like i said, that first post was a LITTLE bit of parity. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #272
I wasn't attempting to establish "parity". OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #283
oh, ....well I was interested in seeing parity with regard to nudity. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #302
"There is no respect shown in magazines that publish pictures like that of women," OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #318
ok....can you find nudes like that of powerful men? BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #326
Parity again? OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #350
oh, those are awesome! gorgeous!! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #353
Just so I understand... OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #428
I still have this one. raven mad Feb 2014 #338
oh good! there's some parity for a change. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #243
The cover with the... one_voice Feb 2014 #309
I'm thinking of replacing my Farah Fawcett poster. OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #320
I would not have been as blunt, Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #95
I am betting you are not their target audience joeglow3 Feb 2014 #133
Probably not, Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #146
Variety is the spice of life joeglow3 Feb 2014 #161
See post 189. redqueen Feb 2014 #207
You are putting words in my mouth to fuel your own crusade joeglow3 Feb 2014 #216
What is that you think I'm making up? nt redqueen Feb 2014 #228
It really is not that hard to figure out. You wrote ONE sentence to me. joeglow3 Feb 2014 #232
Wow. You really are a piece of work. redqueen Feb 2014 #242
So, you ignored everything I wrote and focused one thing not related to the overall theme joeglow3 Feb 2014 #249
Par for the course, there, joe. opiate69 Feb 2014 #250
Yeah, y'know what? Considering you're the 'it's so hard to tell if people are drunk or consenting redqueen Feb 2014 #251
Don't pretend like you "discuss" with people joeglow3 Feb 2014 #293
+ a metric fuckton opiate69 Feb 2014 #304
Nope. That's only your perspective, because you post sickening bullshit like you did about rape. redqueen Feb 2014 #482
I said that was clearly the position of the editorial joeglow3 Feb 2014 #519
The position of the editorial was idiotic rightwing anti-feminist bullshit. We all get it. redqueen Feb 2014 #568
And I laid out objective, technical reasons. You screamed and called names. joeglow3 Feb 2014 #611
You laid out objective, technical DEFENSES OF RIGHT WING MISOGYNIST SPEW redqueen Feb 2014 #613
And you are giving us an encore performance joeglow3 Feb 2014 #635
So we rationalize the actions of Madison Avenue which instills the branding and images into our min LanternWaste Feb 2014 #253
So, your position is that I am a robot joeglow3 Feb 2014 #291
and i am sick and tired of the come-on always being aimed at YOU BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #310
Uh, it's the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. What do you expect? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #377
everything is "what did you expect"....have another read BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #393
Your definition of porn appears to differ from mine. The SI swimsuit issue ain't it. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #539
you attempt to tell me what I can or can't call "material meant to BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #544
To turn the tables would require much more than swapping out male models for female ones. redqueen Feb 2014 #149
Excellent points all Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #166
Conditioning. redqueen Feb 2014 #189
++++ a zillion megapluses. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #331
I presume LordGlenconner Feb 2014 #631
why thank you for demonstrating the hostility I was talking about. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #633
That's hilarious LordGlenconner Feb 2014 #696
nasty sarcasm isn't politely questioning. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #697
I suspect there is no amount of criticism you would accept as legitimate LordGlenconner Feb 2014 #698
you are totally wrong. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #699
Of course not. Hello? Your handle implies you're a man... lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #434
But as I note in an earlier post Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #639
Accuracy is often disgusting... especially as in regards to branding by Madison Avenue. LanternWaste Feb 2014 #252
No one is falling for your childish act MattBaggins Feb 2014 #296
Not an act. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #303
but it is childish n/t Scout Feb 2014 #467
Hey, you're the one with the baby avatar. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #478
Indeed, the chattering commentariat who think women in bathing suits on a beach are "HORRENDOUS" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #452
Fuck your noise Scootaloo Feb 2014 #533
Where's my tongue and noise? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #556
Hmm. I just picked up on that.. "tongue hanging out yada yada"... opiate69 Feb 2014 #559
Canine? No, camelid, actually Scootaloo Feb 2014 #562
Since more Americans own dogs than llamas, that reference seems a stretch.. opiate69 Feb 2014 #565
Only dog with the bugged-out derp eyes involved would be a pug Scootaloo Feb 2014 #588
The pug certainly doesn't either. Puglover Feb 2014 #623
clearly your words establish you as someone in a position to lecture on empathy & decency to others. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #600
Yeah, I have trouble establishing empathic rapport with bigots Scootaloo Feb 2014 #604
I need more specifics. I assume these are the DU members you called.... what was the term you used? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #650
You know..it never ceases to amaze me how the filthiest terms used to describe women on DU msanthrope Feb 2014 #53
Exactly! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #60
First a dog, and now a "douchbag"... opiate69 Feb 2014 #109
Wow! one_voice Feb 2014 #314
Yup.. defies logic, doesn't it? opiate69 Feb 2014 #315
+1 lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #437
No doubt... opiate69 Feb 2014 #447
Yup. HappyMe Feb 2014 #63
Right on, my friend. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #68
i used it to make very clear, beyond any doubt, what SI is using those women for. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #69
So it's okay for posters, regardless of gender, to use that word for "shock value?" nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #75
Not to me. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #78
Indeed...certain rules do apply to certain people...I was called "dear" repeatedly and over msanthrope Feb 2014 #97
what matters is the intent of the shock value. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #88
I still don't think it's right to use that. HappyMe Feb 2014 #102
I'm pretty sure there are lots of pretty boys who would like to be hired BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #118
Boys? HappyMe Feb 2014 #121
you just switched the subject. My reply was to your point--please remain on topic. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #127
lol! HappyMe Feb 2014 #165
you're rambling. Using insults instead of engaging in good faith discussion. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #179
You're deflecting. HappyMe Feb 2014 #185
nope, disagree. I responded directly to your first post to me. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #198
Whatever you say. HappyMe Feb 2014 #205
Here's the essential arrogance of your statement....that you think you are opening eyes, and msanthrope Feb 2014 #125
Oh, to be able to rec this post... alas... applause will have to suffice. opiate69 Feb 2014 #130
Awesome post. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #140
+1 n/t FSogol Feb 2014 #162
Very well said, as always. HappyMe Feb 2014 #168
well ok....clearly you are higher on the hierarchy than I. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #173
You are comparing yourself to Alan Ginsburg? Alan would still have to abide msanthrope Feb 2014 #231
Allen ....no I'm not comparing myself. I'm talking about using literary conventions BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #237
Literary conventions? That's what you think you are using? I think you just need msanthrope Feb 2014 #261
ok....you're obviously in an ecstasy of hate for me. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #264
Oh please! You are not a victim of hate. And you'd better tell seabeyond msanthrope Feb 2014 #275
i didn't say i was victimized by your hatred. :) I said you are enjoying it. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #285
"Jejune?" Look at you! And how is associating you with seabeyond besmirching you? nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #339
but you told me to get a thesaurus.... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #346
I think I got besmirched in this post: Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #362
I agree with you..... llmart Feb 2014 #319
Some of the... one_voice Feb 2014 #317
Comparing Blanch's post to what HopeHoops did? kcr Feb 2014 #532
You mean like femen? (nt) The Straight Story Feb 2014 #196
you know Straight..... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #213
Or maybe.... The Straight Story Feb 2014 #215
maybe. all i know is what i said--- BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #229
Hmmm Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #131
On the Internet, no one knows you are a dog.... msanthrope Feb 2014 #183
Ah, but see, now we are going to descend into a discussion Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #258
thank you again. msanthrope's objection centers on my use of the phrase, BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #270
The context of "media whores" Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #313
chatterati-----oh that is a good one! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #322
Well, to be fair Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #340
heehee.... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #345
Interesting... chervilant Feb 2014 #636
I would agree Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #637
context is everything. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #267
Not very often pokerfan Feb 2014 #208
those are great covers...and true, the percentage compared to BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #217
Agree with you! nt Tumbulu Feb 2014 #21
+1 good point - there could be photoshopping treestar Feb 2014 #83
Photophop is used in practically all magainze photos Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #335
Your women? How many do you have? upaloopa Feb 2014 #164
Well, that would be the sum total of the women I have encountered in my life Kelvin Mace Feb 2014 #172
I would buy it if the legion of boom was on the cover /nt Evergreen Emerald Feb 2014 #18
So would I, but we subscribe to it as my husband and I are huge sports fans. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #19
The Seahawks were on the cover after the Super Bowl.. Upton Feb 2014 #25
Yep...it's tradition. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #26
Sexist horrendous cover, my goodness ! Tumbulu Feb 2014 #20
I don't even see swim suits - just some butt floss. It's pretty disgusting. CrackerJohn Feb 2014 #42
Thanks...now I need some mind bleach. eom Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #677
I feel the same way. leftyladyfrommo Feb 2014 #67
I'm with you on that as well Tumbulu Feb 2014 #501
Oh yay, more glorification of female objectification. MadrasT Feb 2014 #22
Evidence that DU is not a welcoming place for feminists redqueen Feb 2014 #24
Indeed, because it is not natural to look at people you are attracted to The Straight Story Feb 2014 #33
please see my post #34. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #38
There is context here that has to be activley (and desperately) ignored, redqueen Feb 2014 #59
Thank you. nt Ninga Feb 2014 #190
+1 nt laundry_queen Feb 2014 #266
indeed. perfect analogy you gave, too. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #351
Not easy to just turn around like that treestar Feb 2014 #81
exactly. men can not understand what it feels like BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #110
Men may not feel it... one_voice Feb 2014 #323
very true. i think an interesting diffetence here on DU, anyway, BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #342
It is not just about numbers. This is not about being self conscious. redqueen Feb 2014 #391
what a thread this is! orleans Feb 2014 #548
That would only make sense if the "sport" of sex was one-sided. Like hunting, but with women as prey redqueen Feb 2014 #567
No, it is a socially constructed norm to do so. Deep13 Feb 2014 #527
In poetry, writing, art, etc, which were the tools of the day The Straight Story Feb 2014 #529
don't read modern values into pre-modern sources. Deep13 Feb 2014 #555
Seriously??? Pompeii, Herculaneum, Edo and Vishvanath called... opiate69 Feb 2014 #530
"if you even History?" Deep13 Feb 2014 #558
Will Hunting, is that you? opiate69 Feb 2014 #561
Okay. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #579
Yes, sex has always existed. Deep13 Feb 2014 #642
And you know this how? You're inside other peoples' heads now? You were 1500 years ago? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #649
I don't think you get the concepts at work here, TSS Scootaloo Feb 2014 #540
Well, The Straight Story Feb 2014 #543
Thing is, it's not about the models Scootaloo Feb 2014 #546
that was scholarly and eloquent. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #550
Well, I will agree with you to some extent The Straight Story Feb 2014 #552
That's hardly the only difference, TSS Scootaloo Feb 2014 #557
She has something others don't The Straight Story Feb 2014 #572
I appreciate your posts very much. cui bono Feb 2014 #682
The swimsuit covers are of models, not athletes davidn3600 Feb 2014 #545
hear here. you explained it very well. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #547
Yes; just not very good arguments Scootaloo Feb 2014 #549
i just saw..... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #551
Your entire thesis is predicated on a fallacious comparison. opiate69 Feb 2014 #553
So the Swimsuit issue really is just a break for boobs thing, then? Scootaloo Feb 2014 #560
Yes.. it's a "one-off", special edition... opiate69 Feb 2014 #563
Well, it certainly has... gotten different Scootaloo Feb 2014 #573
As has all fashion.. I'm guessing there's a point there? opiate69 Feb 2014 #574
I wasn't referring to the fashion, actually Scootaloo Feb 2014 #585
True, but... regnaD kciN Feb 2014 #693
Is that all? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #55
This is why I would never take you seriously! nt Logical Feb 2014 #297
Really? one_voice Feb 2014 #321
For such a hostile place, there sure are a lot of us here. LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #386
Nope. Many have left. redqueen Feb 2014 #390
Slurs like calling women dogs and douchebags? LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #395
"Douchebag" is considered as such by some. redqueen Feb 2014 #405
As I said... n/t LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #411
But... y'all ain't really feminists, remember? opiate69 Feb 2014 #392
Apparently you're only a feminist.. one_voice Feb 2014 #407
I have pretty much given up trying to take any of them seriously LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #416
Reading is Fundamental. redqueen Feb 2014 #427
Who said I was referring to that post? one_voice Feb 2014 #444
This message was self-deleted by its author redqueen Feb 2014 #469
Nobody is "shaning" these wonen FFS. redqueen Feb 2014 #473
Really! you can't help.. one_voice Feb 2014 #477
Yet another load of vendetta-laden bullshit. redqueen Feb 2014 #485
You should really pay more attention... one_voice Feb 2014 #492
I guess you're ignorant of the fact that conflating the criticism of objectification redqueen Feb 2014 #497
FWIW, opiate69 Feb 2014 #514
thank you very much! one_voice Feb 2014 #517
What's wrong with women being able to make their own choices? Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #511
. one_voice Feb 2014 #521
Ah, you must have missed the scare quotes around "Choice", yaknow. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #538
Sigh. I didn't say "women shouldn't be able to make their own choices" redqueen Feb 2014 #566
*even more exagerrated sigh* One Voice talked about women making their own choices... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #664
See, this idea that individual women can just make up whatever ideology they like, redqueen Feb 2014 #665
I guess yr just going to have to get used to women disagreeing with you on feminism then... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #666
It's not about me. It's about awareness. redqueen Feb 2014 #667
Okay, raise my awareness. Who's cheerleading this thread? Me? Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #673
Oh my! Packerowner740 Feb 2014 #27
Beautiful young smiling women. antiquie Feb 2014 #28
as a feminist, what i want is some parity. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #34
I do not see a problem. antiquie Feb 2014 #45
those covers confirmed my point. DECADES of S.I. covers...and the number of women BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #56
Eye of the beholder. antiquie Feb 2014 #71
thank you....have a great day yourself. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #74
I dont see you complain when Vanity Fair objectifies men davidn3600 Feb 2014 #87
hadnt seen that---and you are drawing a false equvalence. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #96
did someone post that cover shot as an OP on DU? Scout Feb 2014 #99
oh my Skittles Feb 2014 #157
I loved this cover of VF. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #167
See post 189. Swapping male models for female ones changes nothing. redqueen Feb 2014 #223
SI illustrated has a target audience The Straight Story Feb 2014 #51
gay and lesbian magazines are very narrow markets. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #61
Bull crap. SI has a targeted audience of PEOPLE who like SPORTS. ScreamingMeemie Feb 2014 #66
Yep, and a lot of those people like this issue I am guessing The Straight Story Feb 2014 #144
I subscribe to the magazine for the sports...end of story. While I wish they would focus that issue ScreamingMeemie Feb 2014 #147
Well, we can agree on something The Straight Story Feb 2014 #169
I volunteer for that target audience! Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #117
Which is precisely the problem... Hippo_Tron Feb 2014 #160
I can agree with your last sentence The Straight Story Feb 2014 #182
I'm not saying SI should stop doing swimsuit issues.. Hippo_Tron Feb 2014 #219
We can agree on that The Straight Story Feb 2014 #230
Misogyny is more than just "hating women". redqueen Feb 2014 #571
And if you care about the issue The Straight Story Feb 2014 #580
Bullshit bullshit and more bullshit. redqueen Feb 2014 #581
and you are nursing grudges The Straight Story Feb 2014 #583
NOBODY SAID YOU HATE WOMEN WHAT THE FUCK redqueen Feb 2014 #584
Really? The Straight Story Feb 2014 #587
Sigh. Again - MISOGYNY IS MORE THAN THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION. redqueen Feb 2014 #627
"MISOGYNY IS MORE THAN THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION" EX500rider Feb 2014 #647
Wow. redqueen Feb 2014 #653
I see you are back it joeglow3 Feb 2014 #655
Do you think they should do swimsuit issues featuring male models? redqueen Feb 2014 #570
Yes, I absolutely think there should be a male swimsuit issue Hippo_Tron Feb 2014 #615
Nobody thinks super hot men in speedos are "un manly". redqueen Feb 2014 #618
Ask a middle school boy what would happen if he showed up to a pool party in a speedo... Hippo_Tron Feb 2014 #620
Middle school? redqueen Feb 2014 #622
No, I'm fully aware of the issue at hand... Hippo_Tron Feb 2014 #624
Yay! redqueen Feb 2014 #625
Funny that there are actually other people that like sports. It's true! kcr Feb 2014 #245
Yeah, me too. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #35
Yeah, I agree. HappyMe Feb 2014 #44
Yeah..me too. Upton Feb 2014 #52
If you've ever seen the videos on that treestar Feb 2014 #85
Not that I expect the cheerleaders for objectification to watch it... redqueen Feb 2014 #98
thanks! treestar Feb 2014 #103
This message was self-deleted by its author Scout Feb 2014 #114
I get my posts removed packman Feb 2014 #30
Well, if you're going to be a douchbag, Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #31
If you're referring to the photo packman Feb 2014 #40
I believe that poster HappyMe Feb 2014 #91
Yeah, I got that impression myself. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #108
I'm still happy to call you my friend. In_The_Wind Feb 2014 #221
Me too! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #225
"douchbag"(sic).... Gee, I thought that was a sexist slur... opiate69 Feb 2014 #82
Whoa! That is disgusting. leftyladyfrommo Feb 2014 #32
WHAT swimsuits? rocktivity Feb 2014 #36
Nobody with any sense thinks the issue is about swimsuits. nt redqueen Feb 2014 #62
But, But, But....! Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #39
18x3 antiquie Feb 2014 #47
Too early for math Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #49
Porn lite for people too scared to buy actual porn. riqster Feb 2014 #46
No one ever called me a horndog before. antiquie Feb 2014 #48
people still buy porn? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #50
DUzy! riqster Feb 2014 #54
Have you seen the sales numbers for the "50 Shades" trilogy? Some women are indeed buying porn. nt msanthrope Feb 2014 #57
Good point. People even pay money for "Bigfoot Porn", IIRC. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #72
That would be the topic in March. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #73
Ahem... opiate69 Feb 2014 #86
Reviews are pretty good! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #100
"Komm Fur Bigfoot" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #330
Now I'm envisioning "In The Hall of the Mountain King" done in 70s porn wah-wah tones Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #128
lmao! Whoda thunk you were hip to Savatage? opiate69 Feb 2014 #134
50 shades of Grey? Sounds like my hair. riqster Feb 2014 #136
I believe the reference is to the visual? WinkyDink Feb 2014 #159
I haven't paid for porn since I was 18. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #79
This cover is not about sports Brainstormy Feb 2014 #58
Well, an interesting angle, to be sure quinnox Feb 2014 #64
Nice use of the Caps Lock key, for sure. MineralMan Feb 2014 #70
Revealed is the correct word, but MineralMan Feb 2014 #65
What? Why? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #142
Interesting that you react so strongly to my opinion. MineralMan Feb 2014 #163
Have you read romance novels? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #171
that is not correct. further, actually doing two different scientific studies, not answering a seabeyond Feb 2014 #184
So you claim women DON'T buy large numbers of romance novels and joeglow3 Feb 2014 #193
staying on point, wow. totally fuckin' amazing, lmao. ok. nt seabeyond Feb 2014 #194
That was exactly what I posted in my original comment you responded to joeglow3 Feb 2014 #201
you started your argument with a false base. take out the very beginning, your whole post collapses. seabeyond Feb 2014 #204
Who buys romance novels? Why are the bought? Do they create unreasonable standards for men? joeglow3 Feb 2014 #220
I'm not telling you anything. I don't care what attracts you or MineralMan Feb 2014 #224
Where is the beefcake? treestar Feb 2014 #76
A couple of those women look unhealthily thin. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #77
Oh, look, three near naked women. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #80
. Squinch Feb 2014 #288
Boring,entirely predictable flamebait. sufrommich Feb 2014 #84
Funny, I think the exact same thing about other threads! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #90
Yeah, but you think that about threads concerned with feminist issues. redqueen Feb 2014 #129
There are some threads about "feminist issues" I disagree with. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #155
You disagreeing with them doesn't magically transform them into flamebait. redqueen Feb 2014 #178
Just because you don't consider them flamebait doesn't mean RiffRandell Feb 2014 #206
No transformation is necessary. They start out that way. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #460
And you called me a c*nt in meta. boston bean Feb 2014 #597
Wow BB - did not know that. Did it get hidden? n/t seaglass Feb 2014 #601
No it was not hidden. Self - Deleted after a few hours though. boston bean Feb 2014 #602
I do not doubt you at all BB. I'm kind of shocked she would go there and then complain about being seaglass Feb 2014 #603
Please. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #608
There was no apology then. Two years later when you boston bean Feb 2014 #609
I'll take responsibility when I am wrong. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #610
I've sent it. boston bean Feb 2014 #612
Thank you. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #617
You are welcome. boston bean Feb 2014 #619
Same to you. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #621
Thanks for the screenshot BB - provides a lot more perspective on what's going on here. n/t seaglass Feb 2014 #605
Ah, now it all makes sense. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #607
That's fine with me! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #606
Meanwhile she and her buddies are feigning offense at the word "dog" redqueen Feb 2014 #614
Transparent as all hell. JTFrog Feb 2014 #626
Like an open sewer. redqueen Feb 2014 #628
Yes, because insulting women/men is something to feign offense at. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #645
Posting this OP was an insult but I don't see you owning up to it. redqueen Feb 2014 #652
Oh, I am proud. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #657
And, yet, here you are... opiate69 Feb 2014 #94
As far as some sort of modesty functionality of swimsuits goes - are these suits designed to Ed Suspicious Feb 2014 #89
Here's my ass for fucking. Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2014 #92
I don't believe that's what they're offering at all. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #104
of course you don't! that's a perfectly natural position assumed by women everywhere! Scout Feb 2014 #106
"Lick your lips and arch your back" -- Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2014 #113
Nice attack on women and completely unsurprising. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #116
typical that you see THAT as an attack on women Scout Feb 2014 #120
No, I'm a normal person that is not "fetishing" but seeing what's truly there RiffRandell Feb 2014 #132
posing for a photo in a totally unnatural pose Scout Feb 2014 #141
Thank you -- Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2014 #151
My wife and I are nude at the beach. So are our friends. upaloopa Feb 2014 #153
Who would ever have thought of such a thing? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #174
Some women who are nude at the beach stick their upaloopa Feb 2014 #191
Or heard of Europe. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #209
see, comments like this little subthread are just ridiculous. Scout Feb 2014 #472
It's sickeningly transparent dishonest distraction. redqueen Feb 2014 #476
Laugh away! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #481
oh but i thought we weren't supposed to talk about personal lives at the beach Scout Feb 2014 #466
I did and stand by it. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #483
so, because he didn't want to discuss it with you, he can't discuss it with anyone?? opiate69 Feb 2014 #484
+10000000 redqueen Feb 2014 #170
There you go again, thinking you have any ability to "teach" anyone anything.. opiate69 Feb 2014 #180
There certainly are many here who are unteachable but there are also many who have not spoken seaglass Feb 2014 #212
I've learned things from redqueen, as well as from others on DU cyberswede Feb 2014 #287
We're certainly learning some of the kinky projections that go through the minds of some ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #290
You've never seen anything remotely like that on a beach in your life? Really? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #281
Yes.. opiate69 Feb 2014 #284
Be honest, now. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #355
Lol.. true.. here in Washington, beachwear tends to be a little less revealing opiate69 Feb 2014 #359
No shit. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #360
Hah.. Yeah, I can't wait... opiate69 Feb 2014 #366
We actually had one day last summer where the beach was actually beach weather. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #370
Yeah.. the klaxon call must have been rung... opiate69 Feb 2014 #123
omg hahahahahahahaha laundry_queen Feb 2014 #289
Read through and see who are attacking those women. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #295
More laughing. so transparent. nt laundry_queen Feb 2014 #299
"Here's my ass for bringing attention to global starvation." NuclearDem Feb 2014 #122
It doesn't? Lonusca Feb 2014 #255
Seriously? Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2014 #145
+ a fucking gazillion n/t Scout Feb 2014 #105
It is kind of creepy to me HappyMe Feb 2014 #112
It's kind of creepy to me -- Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2014 #137
So, Sports Illustrated EvilAL Feb 2014 #382
Of course that's what that pose means. cyberswede Feb 2014 #143
+ a whole bunch n/t Scout Feb 2014 #148
And so what if it is? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #436
I didn't finger-wag at anyone. cyberswede Feb 2014 #496
The subthread started with a complaint that they're supposedly saying "here's my *** for *******" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #528
It's bizarre to me that you *don't* realize that is *exactly* what that photo is intended to evoke. MadrasT Feb 2014 #156
If a woman enjoys looking at the swimsuit issue, HappyMe Feb 2014 #175
+1 Exactly. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2014 #412
Oh, wow. This subthread. kcr Feb 2014 #537
I applaud SI cvoogt Feb 2014 #93
Couldn't SI do that Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #101
Nice troll, Hitler. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #111
a.k.a. sarcasm cvoogt Feb 2014 #181
i figured you were going there. being an expert at having to clarify, lol.... seabeyond Feb 2014 #188
thx cvoogt Feb 2014 #197
again... lol. i kinda feel the same. unfortunately, when it comes to objectifying women, too many seabeyond Feb 2014 #211
I see three LibDemAlways Feb 2014 #107
"butt thrusting a new sport?" I'll be the judge of that. Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #139
. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #461
T&A sells magazines? who knew Baclava Feb 2014 #126
Gross. Fawke Em Feb 2014 #138
never. Scout Feb 2014 #150
Beautiful bigwillq Feb 2014 #152
I think it's the annual "Find the Swimsuit" issue. WinkyDink Feb 2014 #154
Or perhaps, the "Birthday Suit" issue? Dr. Strange Feb 2014 #256
I don't know about you, but I think proper dental hygenie is important Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #365
Obligatory "Eeeeeewwwww!" WinkyDink Feb 2014 #430
If i were a 70s sitcom Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #432
"disgusting" "horrendous" "horrific" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #158
+1. You'd think DU had been invaded by religious right fundies quinnox Feb 2014 #176
No kidding. Puglover Feb 2014 #403
Add a little of this... pacalo Feb 2014 #177
This OP seems high school boys lockery. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #192
I agree. Rex Feb 2014 #214
Quite common around here. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #218
True, very common in GD. Rex Feb 2014 #234
Indeed. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #241
Yes, which is why I find people freaking the fuck out over it amusing. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #222
Who could have seen this coming? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #438
Nobody expects Rex Feb 2014 #508
My boyfriend PasadenaTrudy Feb 2014 #203
Sometimes you just have to doff your hat at genetic perfection LittleBlue Feb 2014 #226
bah hahahaha. and with that belly laugh. outta here. lmfao. what a hoot seabeyond Feb 2014 #233
You must appreciate how many things must go right to look like that LittleBlue Feb 2014 #240
Or a very talented Photoshopper. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #244
Jeez... Hissyspit Feb 2014 #260
Only in part LittleBlue Feb 2014 #262
That is way overblown, in particular, symmetry. I said in part. Hissyspit Feb 2014 #263
The OP needs no justification LittleBlue Feb 2014 #265
Put in context, yes it does. Hissyspit Feb 2014 #268
Three models trying to sell magazines by looking sexy LittleBlue Feb 2014 #269
Posting it here is the context. Hissyspit Feb 2014 #271
(and all of that, in this instance, has been computer-generated) cyberswede Feb 2014 #298
Who knew photoshop existed in caveman days? kcr Feb 2014 #375
It may be comforting to believe this is all photoshop LittleBlue Feb 2014 #401
Evolutionary psychology is pseudoscience bunk kcr Feb 2014 #409
Standards of facial attractiveness at least are fairly universal in different cultures Fumesucker Feb 2014 #451
Note the part you left out kcr Feb 2014 #459
Quotes are limited to four paragraphs by fair use rules Fumesucker Feb 2014 #463
Fair use means you can't paraphrase? kcr Feb 2014 #465
I'll post what I wish to post and you can post what you wish Fumesucker Feb 2014 #468
it's been my experience... opiate69 Feb 2014 #479
Ymmv indeed kcr Feb 2014 #490
Ah, yes.. the dreaded "l" word.. I think that makes Bingo for me. opiate69 Feb 2014 #499
Libertarians. Big L. Rand Paul. Ayn Rand. But I think you knew that n/t kcr Feb 2014 #500
2 people whose ideas I vehemently abhor. tyvm. opiate69 Feb 2014 #504
Great. kcr Feb 2014 #509
Alert fail. zappaman Feb 2014 #458
Oh my... pacalo Feb 2014 #535
No button for you! Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #596
I don't need a button. I'm the one who's been *forcing* people to click on the OP. pacalo Feb 2014 #659
Oh, I meant that esteemed superhero member of DU's Legion of Justice Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #662
Oh, I know... pacalo Feb 2014 #663
Wait. Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #455
Because models are totally never photoshopped. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #247
I don't think it matters LittleBlue Feb 2014 #248
Those touch ups reinforce the cultural standard kcr Feb 2014 #413
It's obvious this was posted to inflame... Whisp Feb 2014 #236
If they could just roll out more Kate Upton for a while... Lost_Count Feb 2014 #239
When I was a kid Inkfreak Feb 2014 #254
Here is much more interesting and rec-worthy thread, everyone: Hissyspit Feb 2014 #257
How come the swimsuit edition always has women with almost no swimsuits on? bravenak Feb 2014 #259
They started the issue before the internet The2ndWheel Feb 2014 #273
I think you're wrong on that.. Upton Feb 2014 #278
I won't deny there is a certain novelty to the SI Swimsuit issue The2ndWheel Feb 2014 #301
It's the cross between playboy Boom Sound 416 Feb 2014 #279
well, Kali Feb 2014 #277
I have no problem explaining, although I am curious as to why I'm RiffRandell Feb 2014 #328
you aren't being researched Kali Feb 2014 #333
No offense, but I find people that use the word flamebait frequently are RiffRandell Feb 2014 #352
well, that is why I asked. Kali Feb 2014 #354
I used the term and I don't post flamebait. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #480
When we see OPs conveying blatant bigotry we don't hide it. redqueen Feb 2014 #344
Kali was speaking about MIRT, I believe Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #347
Blatant Bigotry? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #348
Yep. These women are dressed and posed as caricatures of female sexuality. redqueen Feb 2014 #367
So I take it you don't read magazines with people on the covers...or inside? nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #373
Reductio ad absurdum. nt redqueen Feb 2014 #379
"Don't you cast that spell at me, Mr. Harry Potter." Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #495
they're at the beach..... in beachwear.... opiate69 Feb 2014 #374
Research for which part of the site, if I might ask? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #332
yeah, MIRT Kali Feb 2014 #334
If I had to guess, I'd say Lemuria strikes again. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #336
yeah that one has been busy too Kali Feb 2014 #341
You all do a fine job. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #343
ESPN mag body issue.. one_voice Feb 2014 #282
Beautiful. HappyMe Feb 2014 #294
Gorgeous! nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #300
Nice. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #308
I um... LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #471
+1 oh goodness...+1! Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #512
Needs moar Kap. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #513
A Valentine's Day card from you? How sweet! Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #516
Yes all for you!! one_voice Feb 2014 #518
To quote Frances McDormand in "Fargo" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #592
Beautiful women! one_voice Feb 2014 #305
A couple of observations... opiate69 Feb 2014 #312
The divining is so mysterious and difficult - lol. 380 posts, open for about 8 hrs and 10 mostly seaglass Feb 2014 #384
Riiiight... because... opiate69 Feb 2014 #402
Exactly! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #415
If it was inconceivable this morning to you and Riff that this is how this thread was going to play seaglass Feb 2014 #423
not just obvious. painfully obvious. eShirl Feb 2014 #425
Great thread, Riff pintobean Feb 2014 #316
OK I give up. What sport are they in? eShirl Feb 2014 #329
Objectify much? Ridiculous photoshopping. The young one? Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #337
It's Valentine's Day on DU!!! Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #349
Why post this? hrmjustin Feb 2014 #369
Because a lot of people don't know where or how to find such pictures. A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #383
Seems like pure flaimbait to me. Wish it was not posted. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #388
Trash it then...that's what I do or just don't even bother reading them RiffRandell Feb 2014 #398
I am a host in GD so I don't do that. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #404
I wish I could give you a heart. kcr Feb 2014 #488
Thank you my friend. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #489
I think I do. kcr Feb 2014 #498
I see no reason to post this OP in GD. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #502
That's exactly what it was kcr Feb 2014 #505
Yep, FB, that's what I was trying to say A-Schwarzenegger Feb 2014 #522
Past Issues Have Been Posted Here Before People! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #380
. pintobean Feb 2014 #387
"Revealed" indeed! LadyHawkAZ Feb 2014 #389
Man, some here got real pissed over this davidn3600 Feb 2014 #394
Yeah, but it has been done in the past and I'm getting the wrath? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #400
It is only to a certain group quinnox Feb 2014 #410
that would be wrong. surprise? check out the many people that called bullshit that had nothing to seabeyond Feb 2014 #414
Well, HoF-ers are all over this thread quinnox Feb 2014 #418
no. again. you would be wrong. seabeyond Feb 2014 #420
Right, I guess all those names I see in this thread are hallucinations quinnox Feb 2014 #421
I must be hallucinating too. Union Scribe Feb 2014 #542
We can call it "rec-shaming" davidn3600 Feb 2014 #554
Don't Rec the thread! YOU'LL GET ON THE LIST! Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #598
We must both be then, because I just looked and see the same thread quinnox Feb 2014 #632
Oh, Dear me... I do hope that doesn't go on my permanent record!! opiate69 Feb 2014 #658
What Have I Done? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #660
I believe you may have broke DU! opiate69 Feb 2014 #661
Small acts of civil disobedience such as this make me feel all warm and fuzzy. n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #422
How does it fit the SOP of this room? hrmjustin Feb 2014 #426
At 438 replies, it fits GD because people are generally interested in discussing it. n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #439
Replies do not mean it fits the SOP. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #442
Silly flamebait at that...nt Jesus Malverde Feb 2014 #534
Not a crime, but it is sexist behavior. cui bono Feb 2014 #648
Anybody notice that they are all topless? B Calm Feb 2014 #397
And?? opiate69 Feb 2014 #399
Yep, is that bad? quinnox Feb 2014 #406
They have tops -They just aren't covered. RC Feb 2014 #487
It sucks that it's so, but I agree with all of the HoFers on this. Waiting For Everyman Feb 2014 #408
Thanks, you said it so much better than I could have Tumbulu Feb 2014 #510
... BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #589
Well said. cui bono Feb 2014 #680
+1 theHandpuppet Feb 2014 #685
My faith in DU is renewed. AngryAmish Feb 2014 #417
RR, you rock. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #419
Thanks Jeff! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #443
i think riff, you got a pat on the back from every guy in the mens group. throw out a naked woman seabeyond Feb 2014 #424
She gets two from me. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #429
Leave it to feminists to complain when women are freely expressing and celebrating their sexuality davidn3600 Feb 2014 #435
rofl Scout Feb 2014 #470
Attacking women AGAIN. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #493
That was hardly an attack on women or the models. cui bono Feb 2014 #681
:snort: Scout Feb 2014 #692
Finally, after 434 posts in this thread, the 435th post says the truth. RC Feb 2014 #507
Couldn't help but come back in here, could you? RiffRandell Feb 2014 #440
Here's a pat on the back from me, Riff... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #449
Thank you. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #450
You get a high five from me... one_voice Feb 2014 #456
I really appreciate this post. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #464
Uh, those women aren't naked... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #448
Their Butts Are Too Small Dirty Socialist Feb 2014 #433
Here ya go quinnox Feb 2014 #441
You beat me to it. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #445
LOL. Great minds... quinnox Feb 2014 #446
Thanks Dirty Socialist Feb 2014 #454
By popular demand here is a preview of next year's cover The Straight Story Feb 2014 #453
But only if they're carrying tennis rackets. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #457
lol Vinnie From Indy Feb 2014 #531
Apparently, this sort of thing would never be legally permissible in "a public space" Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #462
Or this one.. Upton Feb 2014 #474
Looks like the crowd approved. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #475
"yeah, but EXCEPT for medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #486
Yep, apparently they haven't gotten the word they're supposed to be outraged Upton Feb 2014 #491
I know! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #494
Oh wow. Oh my. Oh...... mzteris Feb 2014 #503
What's really sad are the people on this site cheering for it. redqueen Feb 2014 #575
Ah, I see the bikini hater brigade is out again. flvegan Feb 2014 #506
I guess bikinis are as oppressive as burkas to some people davidn3600 Feb 2014 #520
Notwithstanding you point, I just see outrage fail. flvegan Feb 2014 #523
Are you referring to me? nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #524
I don't think so. You posted the OP. flvegan Feb 2014 #525
Got it. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #526
More, actually. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #564
Yup.. who could forget this classic.. (as seen on DU..) opiate69 Feb 2014 #569
I'm not a bikini hater. mzteris Feb 2014 #578
Everyone knows this. It's been explained countless times in even more ways. redqueen Feb 2014 #586
Guess he's on the "naughty" list, eh? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #595
How is that still a thing? The internet has porn, the ESPN mag has naked athletes. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #515
Honestly, magazines in general are flailing desperately to justify their existence. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #536
The point is to remind people of women's place in society, and to pander to men who enjoy seeing redqueen Feb 2014 #576
I'm just not sure how it makes money. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #590
Appealing to men's enjoyment of their higher status in society makes big bucks. redqueen Feb 2014 #591
That really doesn't answer my question. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #593
It makes lots of money. And the reason is not sideboob. redqueen Feb 2014 #616
Sex sells...as always Catherine Vincent Feb 2014 #541
Nope. It's not sex that sells. redqueen Feb 2014 #577
Quelle surprise.. more "edumacating by blogger"... opiate69 Feb 2014 #582
Are you aware that this is sexist and exploitative of women? cui bono Feb 2014 #599
You don't know that Major Nikon Feb 2014 #634
I'm not saying that the swimsuit issue specifically caused anorexia to exist. cui bono Feb 2014 #638
Do you believe a man can...... Logical Feb 2014 #640
Yes, I do. But there is a time and a place, usually privately. cui bono Feb 2014 #641
Not even close..... Logical Feb 2014 #643
It's not just about the person it is directed at. cui bono Feb 2014 #646
Why should consenting adults be ashamed of their sexuality? Or hide it? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #651
But that's not the issue. The issue is the objectification of women. cui bono Feb 2014 #669
I'm not defensive, I simply don't agree. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #674
So why isn't it enough to know that women are offended by it to make you want to not do it? cui bono Feb 2014 #675
I'm sure the people who feel they're entitled to tell gay folks not to hold hands, THINK they are Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #676
I get that you don't agree and I have no problem with the debate. cui bono Feb 2014 #679
...almost everyone here does something that offends someone else, at some point Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #683
At best it's arguably a better fit for the sports forum Major Nikon Feb 2014 #671
I don't like to get into the gender wars, but I must say I've always wondered what liberal_at_heart Feb 2014 #644
Leaving aside the 'sturm und drang' and global Defcon 5 crisis that a picture of 3 women in bikinis Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #654
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #656
If the cover is this good, I'm anxious to see what's inside. NaturalHigh Feb 2014 #668
Yeah, they have several previous models featured. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #672
then you don't want to miss the Kate Upton bodypainting video - no photoshopping here Baclava Feb 2014 #691
I've been assured that there are no bodies that look like that in real life. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #694
I'm not going to lie; Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #678
Who ever hired Rob Liefeld to do the photoshopping for SI LostOne4Ever Feb 2014 #684
Lily Aldridge looks the best to me. CFLDem Feb 2014 #686
More proof we need a meta forum. Rex Feb 2014 #687
And now, GD is going apeshit. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #688
Hold on...I'm not really outraged atm...okay here we go... Rex Feb 2014 #695
Apparently there are no 20something women in the world who actually have bodies like that. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #690
Even the women in that cover don't look like that in real life. backscatter712 Feb 2014 #704
It is. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #705
Back in the old days, they used airbrushing. backscatter712 Feb 2014 #706
Except I'm not talking about in magazines. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #707
Skylar Diggins, Alex Morgan among SI swimsuit issue athletes PoliticAverse Feb 2014 #700
Just HAD to kick it, didn't you? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #701
Riff, you made the 700 Club! edbermac Feb 2014 #702
Nice cartoon. backscatter712 Feb 2014 #703
Offensive and gross. nt RiffRandell Feb 2014 #708
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»2014 Sports Illustrated S...»Reply #669