General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Those who demand that everyone "just ACCEPT that Oswald did it"... [View all]pandr32
(11,668 posts)...and said that he didn't do it. He asserted that he was being used as "a patsy." He was silenced before he ever got the chance to go to trial--or before he could say any more. In the U.S. one is supposed to be "innocent" until proven guilty. The Warren Commission hardly suffices as a proper trial--even Robert Kennedy (Attorney General at the time his brother was assassinated) described the Warren Commission as a "shoddy investigation."
Not only did Oswald have no motive, but for someone that was considered a terrible shot (military record)--and with a notoriously inaccurate gun he "allegedly" learned how to get really good at it, but then forgot to plan an exit strategy, or to get rid of the rather obvious evidence of the gun he allegedly used to kill the President.