Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cold Case: JFK – NOVA program now online [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)142. So you're claiming a 1976 study authenticated the Belgian website?
Is that your level of epistemic competence?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
258 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great, now the folks that made this program are part of your great big conspiracy theory.
cpwm17
Nov 2013
#7
They discussed the condition of the bullet and explained everything including the exact way it
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#82
We much have watched different shows because they showed all the bullet tests on the show I watched.
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#83
NOVA showed that the bullet was able to penetrate nearly three feet of wood block
struggle4progress
Nov 2013
#79
I saw it and was pretty satified that it was Oswald alone. Before watching it I thought it might
OregonBlue
Nov 2013
#2
It's not a "magic bullet" anyway. It is easy to see the trajectory of the bullet
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#55
The silliness is not mine. Do you think the necktie caused the bullet to spin? nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#167
If you really want to know, it had to do with the release of pressure through the exit wound.
stopbush
Nov 2013
#213
You really should go and watch the piece. This was not a regular bullet. It was an Italian one that
OregonBlue
Nov 2013
#187
The suspicion of multiple shooters does not rest on the magic bullet controversy nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#190
A show recommended by irrational people is likely to be an irrational show. nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#228
That Oswald may have been the only sharpshooter on that day does not mean that he "acted alone."
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#112
Easier than that: Oswald was felt he was a loser and had delusions he wanted to be remembered
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#56
It always amuses me when people talk through their hats, as you are doing now.
stopbush
Nov 2013
#114
Great history lesson, but that does not prove anyone other than LHO fired the shots.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#17
Expecting proof before there's been a proper investigation is unreasonable. nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#63
Got a link? Something academic or peer reviewed? I always hear CTers talk about the secret files.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#74
Yes, and scientists led the HSCA to the conclusion of conspiracy in the death of President Kennedy.
avaistheone1
Nov 2013
#13
That evidence has been more recently been rebuked based on science too.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#19
I am sure you will provide some links to those scientists who disagree with that evidence.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#25
This is the original study that Sabato himself bought and paid for - for his own book.
avaistheone1
Nov 2013
#30
I never mentioned if the HSCA did or didn't agree with the WCR about the single bullet.
meanit
Nov 2013
#75
I think we're supposed to forget that ever happened, like the Saudi pages of the Joint Congressional
yurbud
Nov 2013
#216
None of those objects was anything like a human skull traveling a 11-12 mph away from the shooter.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#35
313 is blurred, the SecSrvc to the left rear of the car were splattered and they
KurtNYC
Nov 2013
#57
Frame 313 is smeared. You can see the difference between 312 and 313. Check the highlights. nt
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#71
The smear of the highlights in 313 is not present in the same highlights in 312.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#97
Not cynicism--rigor. I happen to know how easy it would be to alter the images.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#105
Yes, there was a single bullet that caused seven wounds. No magic, only physics.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#186
It means nothing that the bullet was "badly misshapen" in the Australian test you mention.
stopbush
Nov 2013
#45
No, they covered very nicely how the head shot made his head move BACK like it did.
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#80
What's really amazing is that the findings of the WCR stand up to advances in science,
stopbush
Nov 2013
#95
The names of US agents and informants in places like Cuba, for one thing.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#119
Your blatant denial of the forensic evidence suggests you have a conspiracy theory.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#122
The names of US agents and informants in Cuba, Russia, et cetera are sensitive, clearly
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#131
Those names were surely redacted before the Commission even got the document.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#134
Thompson has no credentials or expertise in forensics or photo analysis.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#248
So, when I point out your personal attack you consider that a personal attack.
The Midway Rebel
Nov 2013
#169
Your persistent inability to distinguish between the Zapruder film itself and a Belgian
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#179
Why aren't we talking about your inauthenticated anonymous web author anymore?
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#241
No, we're talking about Itek because it reaches the exact same conclusions.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#242
In the same post where I said I'm not gonna play your stupid games in GD
William Seger
Nov 2013
#226
A self-referential re-iterative loop is where you showed why Thompson was wrong?
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#230
Nova is a great show. Please point out how it changed with the Koch sponsorship. n-t
Logical
Nov 2013
#214
that would take too long to answer. Try this: In principle are you in favor of just one sponsor
librechik
Nov 2013
#236