Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
23. We DO have this problem in The South:
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 05:33 PM
Oct 2013

The Arkansas Democratic Primary was a heart breaking eye opener for the Grass Roots and Organized LABOR. We were given a Look Behind the Curtain,
and it wasn't very pretty.

[font size=3]We did EVERYTHING right in Arkansas in 2010.
We did EXACTLY what the White House asked us to do to "give the President Progressives in Congress that would work with him."[/font]

We organized and supported Lt Governor Bill Halter, the Pro-LABOR/ Pro-Health Care challenger to DINO Obstructionist Blanche Lincoln.
Halter was:

* Polling BETTER against the Republicans in the General,

*was popular in Arkansas in his OWN right,

*had an Up & Running Political machine,

* had a track record of winning elections (Lt. Governor)

*Had the full backing of Organized LABOR and The Grass Roots activists

*was handing Blanche her Anti-LABOR ass in The Primary until the White House stepped in

*Blanche had NO chance of winning the General in Arkansas

Guess what happened.
Our BIGGEST enemy to bring "change" to The Senate was NOT The "Obstructionist" Republicans.
NO!
Our BIGGEST enemy to bring "change" to The Senate was The Obama White House!

The White House stepped in at the last minute to save Blanche's failing primary campaign with an Oval Office Endorsement of The Witch that Wrecked the Obama Agenda,
and Bill Clinton was dispatched on a Campaign Tour for Blanche around the state bashing Organized LABOR and "Liberals" at every opportunity.

White House steps in to rescue Lincoln’s Primary Campaign in Arkansas

"So what did the Democratic Party establishment do when a Senator who allegedly impedes their agenda faced a primary challenger who would be more supportive of that agenda? They engaged in full-scale efforts to support Blanche Lincoln.

* Bill Clinton traveled to Arkansas to urge loyal Democrats to vote for her, bashing liberal groups for good measure.

*Obama recorded an ad for Lincoln which, among other things, were used to tell African-American primary voters that they should vote for her because she works for their interests.

*The entire Party infrastructure lent its support and resources to Lincoln — a Senator who supposedly prevents Democrats from doing all sorts of Wonderful, Progressive Things which they so wish they could do but just don’t have the votes for.

<snip>

What happened in this race also gives the lie to the insufferable excuse we’ve been hearing for the last 18 months from countless Obama defenders: namely, if the Senate doesn’t have 60 votes to pass good legislation, it’s not Obama’s fault because he has no leverage over these conservative Senators. It was always obvious what an absurd joke that claim was; the very idea of The Impotent, Helpless President, presiding over a vast government and party apparatus, was laughable. But now, in light of Arkansas, nobody should ever be willing to utter that again with a straight face.

Back when Lincoln was threatening to filibuster health care if it included a public option, the White House could obviously have said to her: if you don’t support a public option, not only will we not support your re-election bid, but we’ll support a primary challenger against you. Obama’s support for Lincoln did not merely help; it was arguably decisive, as The Washington Post documented today:"

<much more>

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/lincoln_6/


When the supporters of Pro-LABOR Lt Gov Bill Halter asked the White House WHY they threw their support behind Lincoln at the last minute, rescuing her failing campaign, the answer was ridicule and insults to Organized LABOR and the Grass Roots.

Ed Schultz sums up my feeling perfectly in the following clip.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/ed-schultz-if-it-wasnt-labor-barack-obama-

Union Thugs take an ass whipping from time to time,
but we NEVER forget a Sucker Punch & WHO Threw it.[/font]


Walking away from the Democratic Primary in Arkansas 2010, many Pro-LABOR/ Pro-HealthCare activists expressed the opinion that the Party Establishment LIKED things the way they were,
and would rather have a Big Business Republican in that Senate seat than to risk giving an actual Pro-LABOR Democrat a chance to win it.
I couldn't argue with their conclusion.

Obvious takeaway: poor states keep themselves poor through bad policy informed geek tragedy Oct 2013 #1
I couldn't have said it better myself. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #3
No, not obvious YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #6
New York and California say thank you.... Cali_Democrat Oct 2013 #2
The Democrats need to start running some leftists in the south leftstreet Oct 2013 #4
LMAO. nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #5
They run GOPLites, then bash southern voters leftstreet Oct 2013 #7
If there were such a big audience for leftists in the deep south, there would be geek tragedy Oct 2013 #8
You know the thoughts of 50% of eligible voters? leftstreet Oct 2013 #12
There's this great untapped well of support for leftwing policies amongst geek tragedy Oct 2013 #14
No, it's a fairy tale that white Southerners are inherently different from other whites... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #18
Inherently in a biological sense, no. Ideologically and politically, the geek tragedy Oct 2013 #19
Ideological and political views are themselves products of the given social/historical environment YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #20
an entire generation of white southerners has been taught that the federal government geek tragedy Oct 2013 #22
We DO have this problem in The South: bvar22 Oct 2013 #23
... leftstreet Oct 2013 #26
Thanks for that, Bvar22 whathehell Oct 2013 #29
One of the worst aspects is that ... bvar22 Oct 2013 #32
They have essentially pushed Halter out of the 2014 governor's race as well Art_from_Ark Oct 2013 #34
It should be clear to everyone, I'd say, that PBO is no fan of labor whathehell Oct 2013 #38
And the thing about Clinton was Art_from_Ark Oct 2013 #33
Yup...They're turncoats against their former selves whathehell Oct 2013 #35
Yeah, those poor uneducated rubes aren't good enough to vote for us!!! YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #9
It's those Damn Yankees' fault that white southern voters are so rightwing? nt geek tragedy Oct 2013 #11
It's not a North vs South thing... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #13
No, it's a South vs the rest of the country thing. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #16
What you say is technically true.... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #17
Of course there are a lot of progressive, forward looking geek tragedy Oct 2013 #21
"There were conservative Southern Democrats, and there were liberal Northeast Republicans"... YoungDemCA Oct 2013 #24
The point is not that all Republicans were northeastern liberals, it was that there were geek tragedy Oct 2013 #25
LOL they're not extinct leftstreet Oct 2013 #27
Well, folks like you that hate the ACA and collaborate with the Teabaggers to kill geek tragedy Oct 2013 #40
"Liberal Republicans simply do not exist anymore" bvar22 Oct 2013 #39
Oregon was ready and waiting for the money, tens of thousands already added to the roles Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #10
North Carolina too, except all the good stuff you listed. Ready til the GOP SaveAmerica Oct 2013 #31
STATES RIGHTS! progressoid Oct 2013 #15
Sssshhhhhh ! Don't tell them. pangaia Oct 2013 #28
Raise your hand if you're in the south and you told people this would happen? SaveAmerica Oct 2013 #30
Alaska's in that column on the left, as well. Blue_In_AK Oct 2013 #36
This is the opposite of what is usually posted here. former9thward Oct 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Great Medicaid Transf...»Reply #23