Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
37. Time to post this again: "The Democratic Party's Deceitful Game"
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 09:10 PM
Oct 2013

So this week we had a barrage of OP's cheering Reid's momentous announcement that there would be NO GRAND BARGAIN!

Yet now these nine mentioned in the OP appear ready to betray us.

And today Obama's economic adviser indicates that "entitlement reform" is going to be a part of the deal: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023925289#post17

Sounds like the same old scam again. Lots of speeches to give the impression of supporting the 99 percent, while a deal with the One Percent is actively in progress.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2238032
The corporatists who work in both parties are very, very slick at what they do.

http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/democrats_34/

Tuesday, Feb 23, 2010 11:24 AM UTC
The Democratic Party’s deceitful game
They are willing to bravely support any progressive bill as long as there's no chance it can pass

By Glenn Greenwald

Democrats perpetrate the same scam over and over on their own supporters, and this illustrates perfectly how it’s played:

.... Rockefeller was willing to be a righteous champion for the public option as long as it had no chance of passing...But now that Democrats are strongly considering the reconciliation process — which will allow passage with only 50 rather than 60 votes and thus enable them to enact a public option — Rockefeller is suddenly “inclined to oppose it” because he doesn’t “think the timing of it is very good” and it’s “too partisan.” What strange excuses for someone to make with regard to a provision that he claimed, a mere five months ago (when he knew it couldn’t pass), was such a moral and policy imperative that he “would not relent” in ensuring its enactment.

The Obama White House did the same thing. As I wrote back in August, the evidence was clear that while the President was publicly claiming that he supported the public option, the White House, in private, was doing everything possible to ensure its exclusion from the final bill (in order not to alienate the health insurance industry by providing competition for it). Yesterday, Obama — while having his aides signal that they would use reconciliation if necessary — finally unveiled his first-ever health care plan as President, and guess what it did not include? The public option, which he spent all year insisting that he favored oh-so-much but sadly could not get enacted: Gosh, I really want the public option, but we just don’t have 60 votes for it; what can I do?. As I documented in my contribution to the NYT forum yesterday, now that there’s a 50-vote mechanism to pass it, his own proposed bill suddenly excludes it.

This is what the Democratic Party does...They’re willing to feign support for anything their voters want just as long as there’s no chance that they can pass it. They won control of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections by pretending they wanted to compel an end to the Iraq War and Bush surveillance and interrogation abuses because they knew they would not actually do so; and indeed, once they were given the majority, the Democratic-controlled Congress continued to fund the war without conditions, to legalize Bush’s eavesdropping program, and to do nothing to stop Bush’s habeas and interrogation abuses (“Gosh, what can we do? We just don’t have 60 votes).

The primary tactic in this game is Villain Rotation. They always have a handful of Democratic Senators announce that they will be the ones to deviate this time from the ostensible party position and impede success, but the designated Villain constantly shifts, so the Party itself can claim it supports these measures while an always-changing handful of their members invariably prevent it. One minute, it’s Jay Rockefeller as the Prime Villain leading the way in protecting Bush surveillance programs and demanding telecom immunity; the next minute, it’s Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer joining hands and “breaking with their party” to ensure Michael Mukasey’s confirmation as Attorney General; then it’s Big Bad Joe Lieberman single-handedly blocking Medicare expansion; then it’s Blanche Lincoln and Jim Webb joining with Lindsey Graham to support the de-funding of civilian trials for Terrorists; and now that they can’t blame Lieberman or Ben Nelson any longer on health care (since they don’t need 60 votes), Jay Rockefeller voluntarily returns to the Villain Role, stepping up to put an end to the pretend-movement among Senate Democrats to enact the public option via reconciliation.



Call call call. grahamhgreen Oct 2013 #1
........ daleanime Oct 2013 #2
It's those juicy, right wing, might as well be Republican Blue Doggy Centrists again Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #3
The illusion of choice n2doc Oct 2013 #6
In other words if they can't run a conservative Democrat they would rather the Republican win. GoneFishin Oct 2013 #32
We have a 'conservative' democrat here in a swing district, John Barrow n2doc Oct 2013 #35
It is a perfect strategy for the Repugs, infiltrate the enemy where they can do the most damage. GoneFishin Oct 2013 #36
Surprise....not nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #4
I don't even recognize this country any more newfie11 Oct 2013 #5
I was just thinking the- ruffburr Oct 2013 #8
+1 newfie11 Oct 2013 #9
I feel the same way. Brigid Oct 2013 #10
+1 deutsey Oct 2013 #14
+100000000 woo me with science Oct 2013 #17
“We are now talking entirely in Republican terms, in Republican vocabulary after this so-called avaistheone1 Oct 2013 #22
As it says on the red graphic .... Scuba Oct 2013 #7
K&R woo me with science Oct 2013 #11
Kick nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #12
Of fucking course. Worse than worthless fucks. TheKentuckian Oct 2013 #13
Post removed Post removed Oct 2013 #15
kick woo me with science Oct 2013 #16
Feinstein, what a shock. senseandsensibility Oct 2013 #18
But the Entitlements are self -funded! hedgehog Oct 2013 #19
“It’s a horrible negotiating position” avaistheone1 Oct 2013 #20
One party, two faces. Time for the Dem Party to answer to the 99%... polichick Oct 2013 #21
+100000000000 woo me with science Oct 2013 #23
I demand it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! avaistheone1 Oct 2013 #25
I just want to say hi, to all the 9 tools. Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #24
So an article that cites George Will, Fox News, and The National Journal, but does not directly msanthrope Oct 2013 #26
mr george will has obviously not been paying one shit's worth of attention.... spanone Oct 2013 #27
Social Security Keeps 22 Million Americans Out Of Poverty: A State-By-State Analysis Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #28
Durbin: Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #29
Yeah, the usual list of moneyed, conservative assholes Warpy Oct 2013 #30
When is Alternet the harbinger of Liberal Democratic publication that seeks to work within the VanillaRhapsody Oct 2013 #31
Why don't those nine names surprise me? Buns_of_Fire Oct 2013 #33
that is so fucked up. gopiscrap Oct 2013 #34
Time to post this again: "The Democratic Party's Deceitful Game" woo me with science Oct 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sell-Out Alert: 9 Democra...»Reply #37