Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 03:57 PM Mar 2012

Go read the bill and the law it changed. (HR347) [View all]

There are a lot of people saying a lot of things regarding this. From the threads I have read, very few posters have read either section 1752 of Title 18, USC or the contents of HR 347, which amends that section. This is what was voted on, and it doesn't say what people are saying it said. You can read it all for yourself and understand what's being discussed.

Go read the law:

Here's Title 18, USC, Section 1752, which was the only thing changed by this bill. This link has the law as it was before it was modified by HR 347:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1752

Here's HR 347, which changes part of Section 1752:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr347enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr347enr.pdf

That is what the bill did, and that's all it did. You can read it, too. It's short and pretty simple, as far as laws and bills go. I highly recommend it.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K & R. n/t FSogol Mar 2012 #1
Shined the manure zipplewrath Mar 2012 #2
The bill and the law speak for themselves. MineralMan Mar 2012 #3
Yes they do zipplewrath Mar 2012 #4
Yes it's "bad" to add the Whitehouse and VP Residence to the definiton SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #7
And the grounds zipplewrath Mar 2012 #8
oh my "the grounds" that's just "bad" SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #11
I'm confused, are we into commentary now? zipplewrath Mar 2012 #13
Or maybe it was because after the Salahi's pulled their gate crashing stunt onenote Mar 2012 #20
No I'm just into reading the actual law SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #21
You expect people to read? snooper2 Mar 2012 #5
No, actually, I don't. MineralMan Mar 2012 #18
I received an e-mail about this law yesterday from a Republican acquaintance. blue neen Mar 2012 #6
And yet, this was passed by unanimous consent in the Senate, MineralMan Mar 2012 #19
That's it. blue neen Mar 2012 #24
What's the legal difference between "willfully and knowingly" vs. just "knowingly" ? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #9
Perhaps that's because Willful and Intent SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #12
It will depend on how it is enforced. mmonk Mar 2012 #17
It's now "knowingly" and "without lawful authority"... SidDithers Mar 2012 #15
This is about the 50th time there have been people trying to get others treestar Mar 2012 #10
Whenever someone posts something on DU about a bill or law, MineralMan Mar 2012 #16
Here is the change and explained difference in court. mmonk Mar 2012 #14
From my own experience, it's pretty hard to miss an area MineralMan Mar 2012 #22
Well, I do see one thing that jumps out at me. Leftist Agitator Mar 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Go read the bill and the ...