General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

7. It's

Tue Mar 6, 2012, 01:14 AM

Mar 2012

"An Act: To correct and simplify the drafting of section 1752."

When I saw that initially I knew it would be much to do about nothing, but somehow the WSWS lying propagandists get repeatedly posted here on DU. It's embarrassing.

...intentional. The goal is to push misinformation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

72 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OMG, they're coming after us (H.R. 347) [View all] ProSense Mar 2012 OP

Sounds like more Ron Paul RW nonsense to gin up those of us on the left. FLAprogressive Mar 2012 #1

Rec'd for facts treestar Mar 2012 #2

K&R. Facts are good...nt SidDithers Mar 2012 #3

Thank you for those facts SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #4

"An Act: To correct and simplify the drafting of section 1752." joshcryer Mar 2012 #5

It's ProSense Mar 2012 #7

agreed SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #70

Yup... SidDithers Mar 2012 #71

kick SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #6

HAPPY HORSESHIT unionworks Mar 2012 #8

Facts: ProSense Mar 2012 #9

Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #10

I see ProSense Mar 2012 #11

Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #12

what are you, like 12? dionysus Mar 2012 #14

ah, over 20,000 unionworks Mar 2012 #18

you may continue providing me fre entertainment... carry on... dionysus Mar 2012 #51

I Just Want To Know How Much Of The Constitution We Have To Shred In Order To Win... WillyT Mar 2012 #19

Wait ProSense Mar 2012 #21

Wow... Fake Ignorance...Usually Called "Disingenuousness/Intellectual Dishonesty" WillyT Mar 2012 #24

Wow ProSense Mar 2012 #26

I really ProSense Mar 2012 #15

here is the reality unionworks Mar 2012 #16

Well, ProSense Mar 2012 #17

Oh, PLEASE unionworks Mar 2012 #20

Are you ProSense Mar 2012 #22

you are dodging unionworks Mar 2012 #23

Why ProSense Mar 2012 #25

see comment #27 unionworks Mar 2012 #28

Actually, ProSense Mar 2012 #29

have fun doing double duty unionworks Mar 2012 #30

You too SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #31

I won'tbe there unionworks Mar 2012 #34

uh.. SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #35

how biting... not dionysus Mar 2012 #13

In 2008 unionworks Mar 2012 #27

The thought of risking to manage how to survive a destructive R-money presidency for 4 years... Amonester Mar 2012 #37

your heart unionworks Mar 2012 #39

By orders of magnitude, Obama/Biden are the best candidates we have in that fight. Amonester Mar 2012 #43

you've cut me to the quick. how i shall survive, i do not know... dionysus Mar 2012 #52

Why is congress re-wording this section of the law right now? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #32

pure coincidence unionworks Mar 2012 #33

You can ProSense Mar 2012 #36

nevermind limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #38

Did ProSense Mar 2012 #40

ProSense that deserves it's own excerpt in the OP IMO SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #42

I don't imagine a more evil version of Cheney or Bush would come after strikers or protesters Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #44

'Evil' will always have a way to parse the language to do what they want. randome Mar 2012 #45

I agree, I also believe that language will be easy to parse. Uncle Joe Mar 2012 #46

the point is that this isn't new language onenote Mar 2012 #50

They do this all the time for their ad campaigns. It's basic diddling. joshcryer Mar 2012 #41

You mean, why did they adjust it in January 2011?...nt SidDithers Mar 2012 #66

K&R. n/t FSogol Mar 2012 #47

I think you are ... GeorgeGist Mar 2012 #48

Very good response. nt TBF Mar 2012 #49

+1 KoKo Mar 2012 #53

I think ProSense Mar 2012 #54

Perhaps that is because Willful and Intent SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #55

+1 onenote Mar 2012 #68

I think you are ... ieoeja Mar 2012 #67

These are now federal crimes: rug Mar 2012 #56

Please stop trying to promote scare tactics. randome Mar 2012 #57

Facts can be scary rug Mar 2012 #58

And you seem to be ignoring them. randome Mar 2012 #59

What part of "other person protected by the Secret Service" am I ignoring? rug Mar 2012 #60

That part was also included in the 1971 original legislation SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #61

Well, then, there's no need for this legislation, is there? rug Mar 2012 #62

Read the rest of the thread. randome Mar 2012 #63

Maybe you missed post 40.... SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #65

The ProSense Mar 2012 #64

kick SunsetDreams Mar 2012 #69

Petition to uphold our right to petition our grievences shark_attackk Mar 2012 #72