Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
12. The founding fathers were concerned about kings and setting up an executive branch
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 06:58 PM
Oct 2013

that might become like a king.

The peoples house was supposed to be where the rubber of democracy met the republic road. But the document contained a lot of flaws. It included no rights until the bill of rights was used to amen it. Slavery was enshrined in that noble document. The founding fathers did not foresee the real power of parties. They did not set up a method of funding the government in the event that Congress refuses to do its job.

It was a brilliant document for its time, but its time was 213 years ago, give or take.

They could not have imagined a world full of idiots listening to idiots all day on the radio and TV. redstatebluegirl Oct 2013 #1
indeed... ProdigalJunkMail Oct 2013 #3
Who could have forseen Turbineguy Oct 2013 #2
They thought morons would get voted out of office by their constituents. Ikonoklast Oct 2013 #9
Actually they did foresee a buncha stupes getting elected, Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #4
Stupes isn't why there are two houses jmowreader Oct 2013 #16
That explains their election by the state legislature in the original, Benton D Struckcheon Oct 2013 #22
Any set of rules can be fucked with Phlem Oct 2013 #5
Dumb post ... Auggie Oct 2013 #6
Maybe they're only three-fifths as smart as we thought... ( n/t ) Make7 Oct 2013 #7
I'm not sure I quite understand... FurSure Oct 2013 #25
LOL! Jeff In Milwaukee Oct 2013 #31
LOL! FurSure Oct 2013 #35
Their world was alot smaller Marrah_G Oct 2013 #8
It's a political game Lifelong Dem Oct 2013 #10
That cartoon was published 10/2. baldguy Oct 2013 #20
I'm sure they did the best they felt they could. n/t eShirl Oct 2013 #11
The founding fathers were concerned about kings and setting up an executive branch Agnosticsherbet Oct 2013 #12
I believe that is the job of the electorate. BlueToTheBone Oct 2013 #13
What you are really demanding: GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #14
Not at all jmowreader Oct 2013 #18
Sounds reasonable. One question. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #32
I want the Tea Party members removed because they're destroying the country! jmowreader Oct 2013 #36
You are wanting anybody that disagrees with you politically to be removed. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #37
They expected the country to be sensible enough Revanchist Oct 2013 #15
No. They had not way to know what would happen treestar Oct 2013 #17
Yeah, why weren't they omniscient? bhikkhu Oct 2013 #19
They had pitchforks, tar and feathers, etc., back then. gulliver Oct 2013 #21
But they did dare to Gerrymander back then. GreenStormCloud Oct 2013 #34
Actually they were prescient enough to warn against Factions nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #23
No, after such a struggle to establish this nation bluedeathray Oct 2013 #24
Their mistake was in not legislating the powers of parties riqster Oct 2013 #26
We didn't get where we are overnight. meanit Oct 2013 #27
Of course they didn't plan for everything, they went with the best they could come up with NuclearDem Oct 2013 #28
Yep. The Constitution is a failure, and we need to replace it with a parliamentary system geek tragedy Oct 2013 #29
The Houses were to make their own rules zipplewrath Oct 2013 #30
They were, but they never expected petulant children to be elected to Congress. Myrina Oct 2013 #33
I think the FF designed a system for the elite. Not for the people. No third party? Blame them. DevonRex Oct 2013 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You thinkin' maybe the Fo...»Reply #12