Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Rule...Otherwise, STFU. [View all]Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)8. I asked a question which was not answered and instead I got an insult.
Very typical of the 'we insult because we have no way to explain the bullshit we make up' club.
That poster has no examples of these 'posts' that she claims give her the vapors because they do not exist. If they did, she or thee could easily demonstrate. Entire groups being told to shut the fuck up? What groups? Where?
Bluster and a surly attitude do not replace facts or links. The 'make up shit and insult others' club needs to learn that lesson, by any means necessary. Clowntime needs to end.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
telling ANYONE to stfu is authoritarianism to the extreme. I am sure you don't get
KittyWampus
Sep 2013
#5
I'm sure the term is used, but 'threads' recently in which 'entire groups are told to stfu'
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#11
The poster I was addressing claimed to have seen so many threads telling 'entire groups'
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#17
Oh for the love of Mike .. stop getting so mad at everyone else observations
Peacetrain
Sep 2013
#51
Is that what it is, a group? I can think of a few far more accurate and specific words
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#13
The BOG drags it's dramatics all over the board, look at what I dealt with in this thread.
Bluenorthwest
Sep 2013
#50
First of all, prove to me that I've never read your posts. You can't because you are wrong.
cui bono
Sep 2013
#46
That is pretty much the point of all safe haven groups here. If you disagree with the
stevenleser
Sep 2013
#38
Again, your objection should be directed toward the admins/owners of the site. Not BOGgers
stevenleser
Sep 2013
#53
I agree, the admins are responsible for the rules. But the BOGgers are responsible for how they act
cui bono
Sep 2013
#55
I believe that would be an excellent rule, but I doubt the pundits will follow it.
Uncle Joe
Sep 2013
#16
what I'd like to know, is how all those celebrating the result of the "credible threat"
stupidicus
Sep 2013
#25