Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sibelian

(7,804 posts)

10. "In a report that is sure to be considered blockbuster news"

Reply to stlsaxman (Original post)

Sun Sep 1, 2013, 04:25 PM

Sep 2013

Tee and also hee.

No. It's not going to be blockbuster news.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Examiner: Rebels admit gas attack result of mishandling chemical weapons [View all] stlsaxman Aug 2013 OP

Examiner: Doesn't have enough credibility to take seriously FSogol Aug 2013 #1

But ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, PBS, CNN, and FOX do? 1-Old-Man Sep 2013 #35

There has been threads on this.. a big one on the front page right now Peacetrain Aug 2013 #2

Shady source? PHEW. sibelian Sep 2013 #11

Take it somewhere else.. Peacetrain Sep 2013 #13

I'm happy with it right here, thanks. sibelian Sep 2013 #37

Coffee coming up Peacetrain Sep 2013 #39

I am in no hurry to see this locked but it does sound a little fishy. rhett o rick Aug 2013 #3

There's a reason you are left scraping the bottom of the barrel for sourcing this- KittyWampus Aug 2013 #4

The Examiner? sharp_stick Aug 2013 #5

I read Assad's inner circle was caught flatfooted Warpy Aug 2013 #6

Indeed. truebluegreen Aug 2013 #8

This examiner article has already been locked once as a RW site and self-deleted twice. pnwmom Aug 2013 #7

It was locked for inappropriately being in LBN. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #9

The locker said it was a RW site. That means it doesn't belong anywhere here. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #15

Not true. Skinner said that sight could be used to lock threads in LBN because it wasnt appropriate rhett o rick Sep 2013 #16

Here is exactly what the locker said: pnwmom Sep 2013 #17

The hosts voted to lock. There was no agreement that the Examiner is a RW site. rhett o rick Sep 2013 #18

It was the "consensus of the hosts that the Examiner is a RW site. . . ." pnwmom Sep 2013 #19

You are quoting someone. But the consensus was to lock. Only the one person rhett o rick Sep 2013 #20

I'm quoting the host who locked the thread after saying that it was the consensus pnwmom Sep 2013 #21

"That's your idea", yes because I read the discussion. The host that locked the thread rhett o rick Sep 2013 #22

The Examiner IS a RW site. See #23, below. n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #25

Thank you. That's something I can accept. Better than heresay. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #32

It is a RW site...a bit about the owner of the Examiner.com maddezmom Sep 2013 #23

Thanks for the info, maddezmom! n/t pnwmom Sep 2013 #24

Thank you, maddezmom. I wasn't sure if it's a RW site or not. stlsaxman Sep 2013 #27

I am just speaking to the site not the journalist maddezmom Sep 2013 #36

Thanks for posting. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #34

It's too bad that GD doesn't have the standards of LBN... SidDithers Sep 2013 #38

"In a report that is sure to be considered blockbuster news" sibelian Sep 2013 #10

Why the rush to judgement? rhett o rick Sep 2013 #12

Looks like they mishandled them a lot cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #14

then explain the rockets Motown_Johnny Sep 2013 #26

good point. stlsaxman Sep 2013 #28

no it isn't Motown_Johnny Sep 2013 #29

"extremely basic point" or not- that very question occurred to me when I first read the article... stlsaxman Sep 2013 #30

I know you were agreeing with me Motown_Johnny Sep 2013 #31

thank you for clarifying, and pardon my oversensitivity. stlsaxman Sep 2013 #33