Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Renew Deal

(81,889 posts) Tue Aug 27, 2013, 10:40 PM Aug 2013

4 votes, 0 passes \| Time left: Unlimited
	No amount of civilians killed by chemical weapons is enough to justify outside military intervention (No war, support peace, more war isn't the answer, etc.)
	2 (50%)
	1 is too many. We should have bombed Syria months ago
	1 (25%)
	1000 civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	10,000 civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	50,000 civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	100,000 civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	500,000 civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	1,000,000+ civilians killed by chemical weapons
	0 (0%)
	Not sure
	1 (25%)
	Other
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dead is dead. RC Aug 2013 #7

That makes no sense Renew Deal Aug 2013 #3

You asked "How many civilans killed would justify..." Agnosticsherbet Aug 2013 #8

Those are the questions that need to be answered Renew Deal Aug 2013 #9

That's more to the point... eom MrMickeysMom Aug 2013 #13

Ours or theirs? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2013 #6

That's my opinion Renew Deal Aug 2013 #12

How are we going to do that without ground troops? Hippo_Tron Aug 2013 #16

Same way we're doing it in Yemen, Pakistan, etc? Renew Deal Aug 2013 #18

At the risk of sounding like a broken record, that's the wrong question Recursion Aug 2013 #14

That's a potential answer to the same question Renew Deal Aug 2013 #19

i dont blueknight Aug 2013 #15