Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neither. Scuba Aug 2013 #1
Agreed WouldbeCentrist Aug 2013 #3
Or both Warpy Aug 2013 #26
neither. but getting involved in situations where we will almost certainly cause more harm than Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #2
This is the reason I started the thread DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2013 #5
. what would be the most predictable consequences of launching military strikes against Syria? Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #6
I conceded that I would only use force if I was convinced The use of force would be efficacious DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2013 #8
there are situtions where military intervention may be the right thing to do. Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #9
I'm just observing; so far DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2013 #15
Syria isn't the only state to consider. Donald Ian Rankin Aug 2013 #28
"exhausted all other alternatives" seabeckind Aug 2013 #19
Neither seabeckind Aug 2013 #4
I thought the term "isolationist" was first came into vogue when it was used DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2013 #7
Hm. Historically it's been used against the right more than the left Recursion Aug 2013 #11
Yes Recursion Aug 2013 #10
Also I'm curious what "benchmark" means in the context? (nt) Recursion Aug 2013 #12
Neither, isolationism is a mark of populist movements, like nationalism. bemildred Aug 2013 #13
I agree. seabeckind Aug 2013 #16
Yep, that is the hidden "payload". Actually a pretty old argument too. bemildred Aug 2013 #18
Not EVERY issue is one or the other. Bonobo Aug 2013 #14
Military Interventions are more pertinent. Ichingcarpenter Aug 2013 #17
"Isolationism" in the Republican Party suffered a momentous blow when HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #20
An essential element in the purpose for a label seabeckind Aug 2013 #23
I get you. I think there's a distinct difference between being HardTimes99 Aug 2013 #24
Thinking that "isolationism" or "imperialism" are the only two options is the problem. nt redgreenandblue Aug 2013 #21
+1 Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #22
Hmm. MyshkinCommaPrince Aug 2013 #25
in 4 or 5 years .... dtom67 Aug 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is isolationism a benchma...