General Discussion

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)

43. Thank you, sabrina 1.

Reply to sabrina 1 (Reply #21)

Tue Aug 6, 2013, 06:16 AM

Aug 2013

Your arguments are always reasonable and convincing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

166 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Many Of You May Be Interested In What THIS Guy Has To Say, Re: FISA/NSA/Snowden... [View all] WillyT Aug 2013 OP

Kick burnodo Aug 2013 #1

K&R! Phlem Aug 2013 #2

HUGE K&R n/t markpkessinger Aug 2013 #3

K&R MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #4

YES! K&R nt snappyturtle Aug 2013 #5

Grateful that you posted this. Gregorian Aug 2013 #6

You Are Quite Welcome !!! WillyT Aug 2013 #7

K&R think Aug 2013 #8

If I were to post ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #9

Have at it! Exactly which con law profs & their credentials & opinions on the subject. Divernan Aug 2013 #11

With THESE Credentials ??? - I'd Be All Ears... WillyT Aug 2013 #12

Have at it... usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #13

Because ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #15

What do you expect? usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #16

And if the "full investigation" ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #18

Whistleblowers have revealed to us what is going on usGovOwesUs3Trillion Aug 2013 #22

It's the same dodge that Fox News uses. Maedhros Aug 2013 #58

OK, Pal! Glad to rub your nose in the views of prestigious con law profs. Divernan Aug 2013 #25

Nice post. +1000 dkf Aug 2013 #34

figures heaven05 Aug 2013 #71

Excellent dreamnightwind Aug 2013 #36

THAT should be a stand alone OP so it can be bookmarked Autumn Aug 2013 #47

Great post! + a gazillion nt Mojorabbit Aug 2013 #63

ANYONE heaven05 Aug 2013 #68

So... Why DOES Obama Continue So Many Of Bush's Fucked-Up Policies ??? WillyT Aug 2013 #73

Watch out, Willie! He'll put you in his "book", too! Divernan Aug 2013 #76

Like heaven05 Aug 2013 #77

Can You Be Specific... About The Powers Above The Government ??? WillyT Aug 2013 #79

aww heaven05 Aug 2013 #80

WHO are you identifying as a "Bushie cohort" or Bushie neo-cons? Divernan Aug 2013 #75

All that heaven05 Aug 2013 #78

Come ON! Name a name! Divernan Aug 2013 #83

are heaven05 Aug 2013 #85

You're the most confused person I've ever seen on DU. Good luck! Divernan Aug 2013 #93

I heaven05 Aug 2013 #98

LOL. laundry_queen Aug 2013 #112

thank you heaven05 Aug 2013 #131

You honestly think you will find liberal con law profs who support all this? dkf Aug 2013 #82

you heaven05 Aug 2013 #84

I will ask you as I asked another DUer, how much background do you have in constituational law/ JDPriestly Aug 2013 #116

no heaven05 Aug 2013 #134

I won't disagree with you there. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #144

good one heaven05 Aug 2013 #147

Feldman is a liberal muriel_volestrangler Aug 2013 #138

okay heaven05 Aug 2013 #141

Awesome post, thank you. nt AppleBottom Aug 2013 #108

Wonderful opinions. Thanks for posting, Divernan. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #115

How much training/education do you have on constitutional law? JDPriestly Aug 2013 #114

Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #121

With that background, it should be clear that the SCOTUS says that the Constitution JDPriestly Aug 2013 #150

And yet ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #155

But there is no harm in pointing out the flaws in the reasoning of the Supreme Court JDPriestly Aug 2013 #157

Declaring something ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #158

But the fact that the Supreme Court has declared something OK by the Constitution simply JDPriestly Aug 2013 #160

YES IT DOES ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #162

The Constitution is pretty clear about the rights of the accused. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #163

The Constitution was pretty clear on ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #165

Corporations are people only as a legal construct. But groups of people have the right to free JDPriestly Aug 2013 #166

What about this do you disagree with? sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #17

Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #20

But there is also plenty that we know. And what we actually know is bad enough. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #21

Thank you, sabrina 1. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #43

post 68 heaven05 Aug 2013 #69

That is positively Rumsfeldian tkmorris Aug 2013 #37

I thought the same thing. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #42

And so you still try to defeat the facts with nothing. cui bono Aug 2013 #39

And to make your argument ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #45

The facts and evidence have been examined by a large number of credible people Maedhros Aug 2013 #60

credible heaven05 Aug 2013 #70

See post #100 in response to post #68 sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #101

How much money do you think our government spends on this program? JDPriestly Aug 2013 #119

Hey heaven05 Aug 2013 #133

Nothing against Obama. He is my president too. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #146

yeah heaven05 Aug 2013 #74

You're a new one. Maedhros Aug 2013 #103

The word salad is strong in that one. nt laundry_queen Aug 2013 #113

guess heaven05 Aug 2013 #127

You're projecting. Maedhros Aug 2013 #145

yeah heaven05 Aug 2013 #87

Ron Wyden is a neocon? Maedhros Aug 2013 #102

I heaven05 Aug 2013 #129

actually heaven05 Aug 2013 #139

Lol!! I actually took you seriously upthread. But now I get it, you're a comedian!! sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #106

thank you heaven05 Aug 2013 #128

However, you aren't presenting any opposing argument. cui bono Aug 2013 #64

I heaven05 Aug 2013 #81

Let me ask you a question ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #89

yep heaven05 Aug 2013 #90

Apparently ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #91

seems heaven05 Aug 2013 #97

You don't want 'Busies' dragged into this?? Really?? Well, then we are on the same side. sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #100

you're heaven05 Aug 2013 #126

It helps that Snowden and Greenwald have evidence... Maedhros Aug 2013 #143

And yet ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #153

It's been shown as "less than evidenciary?" Maedhros Aug 2013 #164

Not sure how you gathered that... but no, I don't think I am that person you described. cui bono Aug 2013 #104

And ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #120

What part about ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #88

who's heaven05 Aug 2013 #72

I heaven05 Aug 2013 #86

Yep Bush is STILL president AppleBottom Aug 2013 #110

deal heaven05 Aug 2013 #130

Kind of defensive aren't you? AppleBottom Aug 2013 #132

no heaven05 Aug 2013 #135

So what you're effectively saying is that Obama has no power to change anything, is that correct? AppleBottom Aug 2013 #136

no heaven05 Aug 2013 #137

Ahhh I see, so it doesn't matter who you vote for and your support of Obama's fascist AppleBottom Aug 2013 #140

bubble heaven05 Aug 2013 #142

Wow, what a dodge. AppleBottom Aug 2013 #109

A dodge? ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #122

What Obama has admitted -- that they collect metadata, JDPriestly Aug 2013 #118

Yes he did ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #123

How would Obama know what the technicians like Snowden JDPriestly Aug 2013 #148

Really? ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #154

Yes. Really. He believes what he is told. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #161

"If ..."? AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2013 #24

Yup! He hasn't been able to quote/cite/link to a single opposing opinion. Divernan Aug 2013 #26

How about you? burnodo Aug 2013 #44

Actually ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #46

but you're saying the person who is the subject of the OP is wrong burnodo Aug 2013 #51

No ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #124

I note you don't actually post even one peer of Pyle's as you claim you could. Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #53

I made no such claim ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2013 #125

knr Douglas Carpenter Aug 2013 #10

K&R cantbeserious Aug 2013 #14

K&R forestpath Aug 2013 #19

K&R Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #23

Time to stop this... midnight Aug 2013 #27

Who exactly is a member this court? Rosa Luxemburg Aug 2013 #28

Roberts did the appointments. Nuff said. dkf Aug 2013 #35

Night Willy! Thank you. nt Mnemosyne Aug 2013 #29

Anythime... WillyT Aug 2013 #49

This message was self-deleted by its author ohheckyeah Aug 2013 #30

Secret court, secret laws, etc. <-- not cool with me. K&R eom 99th_Monkey Aug 2013 #31

good question for those who swear spying is okay as long as it is democrats doing it. If the court liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #32

K&R. Now that is how a constitutional scholar and professor thinks about these issues. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #33

Maybe he could take a moment and chat up President Obama - giving him truedelphi Aug 2013 #38

du rec. xchrom Aug 2013 #40

Oh, baby! Kicked and Recommended! Enthusiast Aug 2013 #41

K&R Solly Mack Aug 2013 #48

sadly, because this article clearly names the Republicans as perps, and not "both sides" librechik Aug 2013 #50

We as a Party have to rise up against it. Savannahmann Aug 2013 #52

As Democrats our targets should be our congressmen that voted against our interests [n/t] Maedhros Aug 2013 #61

"When the secret court was created in 1978, it was meant to authorize targeted searches, but..." GiaGiovanni Aug 2013 #54

Tragically this will not penetrate blackspade Aug 2013 #55

The Conservative Bubble: bvar22 Aug 2013 #57

k & r snagglepuss Aug 2013 #56

I did a little hunting on this the other day myself..and Prof Pyle missed a big old target Peacetrain Aug 2013 #59

You say all that like it MEANS something. bvar22 Aug 2013 #65

Well a person has a choice bvar.. Peacetrain Aug 2013 #66

AS the LEADER of the Democratic Party, bvar22 Aug 2013 #92

You don't want to be involved.. Peacetrain Aug 2013 #94

you're heaven05 Aug 2013 #99

What in the WORLD is "obfuscating" & "twisting"... bvar22 Aug 2013 #149

like heaven05 Aug 2013 #151

Your behavior belies your words. bvar22 Aug 2013 #152

The PAA expired in February 2008 ProSense Aug 2013 #95

Well Thank You Pro Peacetrain Aug 2013 #96

k&r avaistheone1 Aug 2013 #62

good one heaven05 Aug 2013 #67

"It is the very sort of general warrant DirkGently Aug 2013 #105

The people in power have been lying to us for years AppleBottom Aug 2013 #107

Proud to be the 199th rec. woo me with science Aug 2013 #111

and 200th here dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #117

Only the most obtuse don't understand this. K&R! whatchamacallit Aug 2013 #156

K & R GiaGiovanni Aug 2013 #159