Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: so what exactly happened with Obama and congress today? [View all]Uncle Joe
(58,363 posts)67. There are two primary ways that can happen.
1. If you're a liberal, progressive or even moderate, the power of your vote will diminish over time as more of that political persuasion will become alienated or disenfranchised from the system, fewer voting = fewer in power.
The people most enthusiastic about participating will be the extremist authoritarians, a police state will more or less be voted into power.
2. I don't believe Obama to be the one to do it but when a future Dick Cheney or George W. Bush come to power, as the people become increasingly frustrated over the surveillance state and eternal war, that future administration will be positioned to crack down even more, declaring martial law.
Surveillance state morphs into a police state.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
98 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny I saw part of a video of Obama with the Dems on TV, but didn't see Grayson with 'em. n/t
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#5
Not just Grayson, Al Franken is now on board as he witnesses more and more of these
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#35
Part of what Obama discussed with the Dems on the Hill is in the article on link below
Tx4obama
Aug 2013
#4
You're reading way too much into those two words. But if leaping to conclusions is your thing ...
Scuba
Aug 2013
#16
You don't have to believe a " fleeing accused felon, over our elected government" ...
Scuba
Aug 2013
#22
I don't like to waste time since the Democratic platform is readily available,
Progressive dog
Aug 2013
#30
I followed you all the way down to here where you say you don't usually assign
matthews
Aug 2013
#26
But you can tell us what isn't even on the list? Okay, I think I finally understand. nt
matthews
Aug 2013
#31
Don't really care. I don't prioritize things myself. Then again, nor do I leave them
matthews
Aug 2013
#43
War on terror, war on drugs don't have to be real wars to serve its' purpose.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2013
#75
It might simplify matters if you would make up your mind, but if it helps any you were correct the
Uncle Joe
Aug 2013
#90
That's why I included this paragraph in my post to which you just responded to.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2013
#93
Are you forgetting the election fraud, gerrymandering, picking who we are allowed to vote for in
RC
Aug 2013
#84
actually, adults in business & government do it all the time. all the time, in formal plans & on
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#41
you claimed that adults didn't prioritize, 'only children,' because adults could do two things at
HiPointDem
Aug 2013
#51
Really, since when did Bush's spy policies 'not make the Democrats' list'? Airc it has been on the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#36
Like I said, you need to catch up with the news. It is not a 'small group' of Democrats
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#58
This is a fringe issue. While we can see the importance of reigning in the NSA,
JaneyVee
Aug 2013
#32
Bush policies have always been at the top of the list of important issues for Democrats.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#38
There are critical issues being decided about the sequester - Repubs are in disarray
JPZenger
Aug 2013
#24
Yes, not exactly the same. Greenwald is more directly expressing his suspicion
deurbano
Aug 2013
#70
Sorry to burst your bubble but the NSA issue is NOT the most important issue facing the US
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2013
#48