Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oath Keepers Heart Edward Snowden! [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)191. So I didn't participate in the consistently-rigged system that would have had me holding my nose
no matter who I voted for.
So, yeah, actually, it does.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
218 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"They arrived on the scene with much fanfare and were often staples at tea party and Second....
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#80
Who said you can't question? And yes, his motivation is of paramount importance to many of us.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#207
Well that's it then. Call your Reps in Congress. It's the only way to address it now. nt
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#209
That is not the latest poll. That is from July 5th, before the public fully understood
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#118
No, he won't. He would be kept in solitary, probably tortured (for his own good) like Manning
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#163
Well, excuse me for taking more than a few minutes to get back to a request on the internet. Sorry
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#160
Not strange. Just opposition to the black President under the cloak of supporting the Constitution.
kelliekat44
Jul 2013
#133
You side with John Bolton on drone strikes, and Dick Cheney on domestic surveillance.
Marr
Jul 2013
#4
Nice collection of unrelated links. You still agree with John Bolton and Dick Cheney. /nt
Marr
Jul 2013
#12
How silly. The fact is that Marr is correct, so it is not a good idea to try to smear someone
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#24
You started a preposterous game. Now that we all decided to play, you don't like the game.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#37
The OP is so defensive that the only way to deal with it was to have some fun with it.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#55
I would'nt worry, it's not working anymore. We have all had an awakening over the past
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#25
I thought you wanted to play a preposterous game. I love these games, always have. If you
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#39
You "thought" wrong, and screaming that I agree with Cheney is pure silliness. n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#56
Oh well then, I guess I will change my opinion of Snowden now, thank you.
Puzzledtraveller
Jul 2013
#16
What do you make of Cheney's and Bush's and King's and Fleischer's and Ledeen's
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#29
His non-fan club include Cheney, Bush, Fleischer, Limbaugh, Faux and 'we count the votes' Peter
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#32
I think everyone is enjoying this thread immensely. So see what you did, you united everyone
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#43
Nice deflection. I'm not, but why are you so defensive about this article? n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#41
One thing I've learned - it's not worth arguing with people with six-figure post counts.
reformist2
Jul 2013
#48
Alluding to someone's post count (whether high, low, whatever) was taboo on the old DU2.
Scurrilous
Jul 2013
#176
This is what we have to look forward to in 2014 and 2016 if the left doesn't come to its senses
AllINeedIsCoffee
Jul 2013
#49
I'm a heterosexual, 25-year-old caucasian male studying in a field that has a 4% unemployment rate.
AllINeedIsCoffee
Jul 2013
#66
Your failure is in thinking that critisism of a Dem means a no vote for the Dem.
L0oniX
Jul 2013
#73
So does the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Daniel Ellsberg.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#68
You are citing one group's opinion. I'm saying that there are groups that share that opinion.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2013
#74
So do liberals and progressives. Edward Snowden is an American hero, riding to warn us of danger
quinnox
Jul 2013
#76
You've posted this so many times that I'm starting to think you're just goofing on us...
Scurrilous
Jul 2013
#83
I'm not Snowden defender, but how simillar to the "Obama palling around with terrorists" attempt
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#78
Apparently some believe one can judge veracity and integrity by the most extreme of your supporters
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#93
Your intent in posting this is very clear to most on this thread, PRO.... Big fail.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#96
Bullshit. The article is what it is. Projecting "intent" is purely a cheap deflection tactic.
ProSense
Jul 2013
#99
It is all our problem when one of our supposed "own" uses these kind of tactics
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#101
Pro--these character assasination by association tactics are the ultimate deflection...
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#105
Ugly ugly failing strategy, ProSense... I understand you have a stake in defending administration
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#108
Not just me that sees this as very wrong. You are better than this, ProSense...
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#114
Hey, go for it... Klayman and the group in your OP are kooks... That's not the point..
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#122
Right... I and four dozen others on the thread just "made up a point".... How, convenient when your
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#132
Even the most extremist RW groups in our society may express a real concern, even if their reasoning
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#120
I and about four dozens other here have made it very clear what this issue is. Feign confusion
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#126
Nor do you win debates by deflecting with straw men.... but you certainly are trying
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#142
Accusing ME of something I have never ever posted, uttered, or thought-- NICE and very dishonest, PR
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#149
You lied about me in your last post... attributing comments to me I NEVER said/posted.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#153
No, I didn't. You (and others) are having trouble dealing with the content of the OP. n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#155
YOU MOST certainly attributed a comment I never made to me... THAT is the definition of lying.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#157
THe direct evidence of your lie (post 146 ). Anyone here can verify I NEVER SAID THAT
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#164
You was generic. Not everyone is doing all those things. You (and other) are having trouble
ProSense
Jul 2013
#165
I deflect NOTHING... Your accusation/comment you attributed to me was a DEMONSTRABLE LIE...
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#171
^^^^ Everything you need to know (perhaps already suspected) about this poster^^^
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#173
Everything I need to know about you: You can't accept facts, and love to deflect.
ProSense
Jul 2013
#175
You lied (demonstrably and irrefutably). No, you don't get to play the vicitm.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#178
Deflection, it's about you covering an embarrassing episode of false accusations. n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#181
Covering YOUR embarrassment, perhaps... YOU SHOULD BE embarrassed & ashamed at your lie.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#182
You lied, PROSENSE (demonstrably and irrefutably). No, you don't get to play the vicitm.
hlthe2b
Jul 2013
#187
What you are telling everyone is that right and wrong do not figure in your opinions.
RC
Jul 2013
#159
Please stop projecting silliness. Don't want to read the OP report. Don't. n/t
ProSense
Jul 2013
#162
Christ, Hitler built the predecessor to the Interstate Highway. I like the Interstate Highway.
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#174
Wow, awesome rewording! Considering I didn't even vote in 2008 or 2012, it's even more awesome!
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#188
So I didn't participate in the consistently-rigged system that would have had me holding my nose
NuclearDem
Jul 2013
#191
Well, 'cause you rather come off as an unhinged crusader, and are relying on guilt by association
Scootaloo
Jul 2013
#192
No, that's your take, but then again anyone who supports Snowden would make that claim.
ProSense
Jul 2013
#194
Just because you use a word doesn't mean it's applicable; in this case, "projecting"
Scootaloo
Jul 2013
#210