Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Du ... Let me ask you a question ... [View all]HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)129. no. that barack obama became the first black president is simply a matter of timing. someone
would be first, he was there with backers when the party decided to run a black candidate (which itself was a product of political calculations). the rarity has nothing in particular to do with BO's specialness, it's a product of history.
as for people coming out of harvard law & becoming senators, presidents, whatever -- it happens often enough to fill the limited slots.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
184 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, this is a Representative Democracy. So we can try and persuade elected representatives
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#11
there is no representative government without a trustworthy information broker, and there is
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#45
That is why I trust President Obama 100%. He might not be right 100 out of 100, but he knows more
graham4anything
Jul 2013
#4
Yes. Sigh, if only Adlai had won in 1952 and 1956 and not the ruthless military leader that did.
graham4anything
Jul 2013
#52
another gag-inducing comment. i see no evidence that obama is 'smarter' than me or
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#48
you know who else was editor of harvard law review? phyllis schlafly's son andrew.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#79
no. that barack obama became the first black president is simply a matter of timing. someone
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#129
um, you can't tell the difference between "that BHO became the first black president is simply
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#149
thing is though, those others also have other accomplishments. joe mccarthy for example, had
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#176
i doubt it. the general population is average, and so is the political establishment.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#130
maybe they were, which is why the meme of 'smartness' is completely beside the point.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#150
george bush 1 & 2 were in the oval office too. being in the oval office doesn't mean someone
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#74
his mother worked for usaid under tim geithner's dad. his grandmother was a bank president.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#96
How the fuck was his mother and grandmother equivalent to something like the Bush family?
BumRushDaShow
Jul 2013
#98
bank of hawaii = not some local bank. i didn't say the dunhams were equivalent to the bushes.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#119
it's not about *me*. it's about the assumption that political leaders are 'smarter' than the people.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#120
every human being has intelligence. academic intelligence is only one kind of intelligence & it's
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#154
straw man much? obama has been repeatedly painted as the poor black son of an unwed mother
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#160
another straw man. i don't care whether he was poor or rich or working class, i care about
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#163
and as i said, no surprise there. there's a whole lot you don't care about that most ordinary
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#165
I'd imagine that petulantly denying the relative intelligence of another person
LanternWaste
Jul 2013
#116
'or most people'. i don't privilege myself. intelligence is not a 'ranking'. but your statement
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#155
I would wager that he is not. I would wager that few politicians are smarter than the average
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#66
i'm not a bit uncomfortable, as the whole issue of 'smartness' is a big freaking joke.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#137
it has nothing to do with him being black. it has to do with him being a politician and president.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#151
it leads me to no uncomfortable places, as i do not have the problem of thinking black people
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#153
not vain at all. anyone who has actually followed my posts knows that i post a great deal of hard
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#179
no, just an misreading. please do continue your regularly scheduled personal attacks.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#182
gag. i can't explain how gag-inducing those comments are without name-calling.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#46
I believe the Greeks utilized a form of participatory horizontal democracy at some point
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#54
That only works for very very small populations. Plus the ancient Greeks excluded most of it....
Hekate
Jul 2013
#55
Thanks for that but I believe =we can do it better= and include everyone.
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#56
LOL The Greeks had some great ideas, but shoot, that business about "pure" democracy
Hekate
Jul 2013
#84
The real problem is that there is nothing in a single liberal democratic constitution about
malaise
Jul 2013
#62
No leaders or representatives? Even the little towns in Vermont with their town halls
pnwmom
Jul 2013
#92
I believe this corrupt government is a real, present danger and that we as a people
Fire Walk With Me
Jul 2013
#93
They are anti-Obama no matter what. It says nothing about the legitimacy of the various positions.
GoneFishin
Jul 2013
#21
My vote and support has to be earned. That's all. Everything else is bullshit...
Demo_Chris
Jul 2013
#15
Interesting... justification for spying, but I say, if they can do it, why can't we?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jul 2013
#17
If we have a choice between Obama and Romney, that's and easy choice, even if Obama is not perfect!
DrewFlorida
Jul 2013
#22
Really. The most we can do is vote? What an idiot that Martin Luther King was...
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#23
Much of white America needed exposure to MLK and the civil rights movement...
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#32
MLK opened a nation's eyes to the reality of institutional and every day racism. Snowden is opening
Luminous Animal
Jul 2013
#39
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me again, shame on me. Fool me again, shame on me again.
GoneFishin
Jul 2013
#25
All of that analogy is based on the various misrepresentations of the NSA issue I have seen here...
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#29
To say that his shift to the right is only because of congress is missing one big part
Marrah_G
Jul 2013
#37
+1. also, he had a democratic majority in the early part of his presidency, at which time
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#50
seems to work ok for the republicans. i'm not going to rehash that red herring, you know it's
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#128
Yes. And in engaging in confirmation bias to this degree, the paranoia is stoked by
Skidmore
Jul 2013
#91
what you say is true until you get to "the most we can do is vote for the person/party that we
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#44
governments act when they are pressured to act. FDR carried out the New Deal when pressure was on to
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2013
#49
Let me make it easier for you....."Vote for the lesser of two evils!". Dumb. n-t
Logical
Jul 2013
#64
And as long as you do it, and do not demand more, you will keep getting crap candidates. n-t
Logical
Jul 2013
#67
Democrats ARE voting to dismantle the social safety net. already happening. been happening.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#82
Because some people want to have a version of our own "purity" test that the Rightwingers use...
VanillaRhapsody
Jul 2013
#78
+1000. The sincere apologists (not the pros) are misguided, and like parents that won't
GoneFishin
Jul 2013
#100
You can fight to get more trustworthy candidates. Senators Warren or Wyden, for example
muriel_volestrangler
Jul 2013
#99
The set up makes the conclusion kind of silly. Even if the game isn't rigged, one has to assume it
TheKentuckian
Jul 2013
#156
Because maybe you can reach one more mind? Maybe you can change a mind? Maybe you can
silvershadow
Jul 2013
#166
not good enough for me anymore. The all work for the 1% now and have shown themselves to be
liberal_at_heart
Jul 2013
#172