Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You have failed [View all]Skidmore
(37,364 posts)78. And who is responsible in our system for oversight?
Last edited Tue Jul 2, 2013, 01:32 PM - Edit history (1)
Congress....fancy that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
173 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
But none of that is what the entire campaign against Snowden or Greenwald is what this is about?
Aerows
Jul 2013
#40
Not nearly as upset as those who support the policies of Bush. We have the most massive
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#43
Yes, usually when confronted with her duplicity of opposing it under Bush
LondonReign2
Jun 2014
#173
open minds are interested in facts; closed minds find it easier to deal in personalities.
byeya
Jul 2013
#9
There's an even bigger cadre of people who are concerned about what we have learned about
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#121
You can be "concerned" about these issues and not be convinced that a bullshitter
MADem
Jul 2013
#149
I think War Criminals and Wall St criminals should never have been protected the way they were
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#48
Metadata. Individual call details, including IDENTITIES, still require a warrant to obtain.
CakeGrrl
Jul 2013
#139
They have plenty of experience changing their opinions based on the letter
LondonReign2
Jul 2013
#13
That is amazing! I would be ashamed to have changed my mind about something so important
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#53
It most definitely is. To see the evidence of the 'evolution' of some on the 'left' is, maybe
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#142
I was agreeing with you. The hissy fits in this thread are 'freaking hilarious'.
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#153
You may be 'done', which is not my problem. I decide when I am done. I read post #66 and I
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#165
I don't remember the OP EVER supporting Bush Policies. Have you checked out post #13 btw?
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#99
No actual, verifiable facts Greenwald revealed show that the US govt spying on its own citizens.
baldguy
Jul 2013
#14
Don't like Greenwald and don't see evidence that the U.S. government is spying on citizens.
randome
Jul 2013
#64
I do own it, what does that statement have to do with 'Snowden worship'?
whatchamacallit
Jul 2013
#86
I think some of you are way too invested in trying to divert attention away from the message. But
sabrina 1
Jul 2013
#101
Unless you have a country to put Snowden's ass in, I bet he doesn't really give a shit whether or...
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2013
#122
It's a vocal minority who are defending the NSA and attacking Snowden/Greenwald
ram2008
Jul 2013
#136
Nope, people agree with me, and it is trending that way even more strongly now. nt
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#157
It's kind of like how half the country liked Bush, and half the country hated him.
Zorra
Jul 2013
#163
Its not half and half, its trending strongly against Snowden. I'm not restating anyone else's
stevenleser
Jul 2013
#164