General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What kind of person would think that Zimmerman had the right to... [View all]MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)By bringing up that statute, after I explained to you why it doesn't apply to Zimmerman's defense.
You're beating dead horse, dude.
HE... ZIMMERMAN was the aggressor!
Martin didn't come to Zimmerman and just pop him in the face for no good reason at all. Zimmerman chased down Martin and accosted HIM without provocation.
How can Zimmerman chase down Martin and NOT be the aggressor if Zimmerman (While armed) was the one who initiated an confrontation by angrily demanding of Martin his reason for being in that complex?
Explain that shit.
The statute says that an aggressor (Zimmerman) has a way out, if he's restricted to using force AFTER trying to take himself out of the picture.
When and where did Zimmerman do any of that before he pulled that gun and shot Martin to death?
Where is YOUR interpolation of that statute?