Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
Tue Jun 18, 2013, 10:17 PM Jun 2013

FISA & EPCA the facts & nothing more [View all]

I have been watching the madness unfold regarding Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the allegations that US Citizens are being illegally monitored & investigated by these Intel agencies yet so far nothing has been provided to substantiate these allegations. Both FISA and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) both clearly outline what the legal parameters are as well as the procedures.

As to the allegations that the US Government is illegally data-mining our call logs. The Supreme Court has ruled in States v. Miller, 442 U.S. 735, 741-46 (1979), that customers do not have a 4th Amendment right to protected expectation to privacy and that no warrant was required for these documents if it was merely identified the number the call originated from and the destination number. Furthermore the court held the customer had no justifiable expectation of privacy in information which he knew or should have known the telephone company might ordinarily capture for billing or service purposes. As such, claiming your constitutional rights have been violated because of this action alone is a moot point and was decided by SCOTUS 34 years ago.

Conducting surveillance on US Citizens: FISA subsection 702(b) specifically outlines the intelligence gathering on everyone not just people outside the US. This section has several limitations on the acquisitions on these targets and are as follows: 1) may not intentionally target any person known at the time of acquisition to be located in the United States; 2) may not intentionally target a person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States if the purpose of such acquisition is to target a particular,
known person reasonably believed to be in the United States; 3) may not intentionally target a U.S. person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States; 4 ) may not intentionally acquire any communication as to which the sender and all intended recipients are known at the time of the acquisition to be located in the United States; and 5) must be conducted in a manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Finally, the EPCA also protects everyone's emails, voice-mails, and another electronic communications, the gov can't obtain/maintain or read, without a real warrant, FISA only used for Foreign Intel. I know this is a hot topic but there really are laws in place that prevent any violations of our 4th Amendment rights when it comes to intelligence gathering. These laws govern all entities that gather Intel for us & it is all prosecutable & people do get prosecuted for misusing the access they are given.

Re-authorization of FISA http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R42725.pdf
Privacy: An Overview of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/98-326_20121009.pdf

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FISA & EPCA the facts & nothing more [View all] giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 OP
Thank Gawd they never break laws RobertEarl Jun 2013 #1
I am talking about experience giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #3
experience is welcome, could you comment on greenwalds detailed take on FISA? Monkie Jun 2013 #5
When I get home tonight giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #18
ok sorry, i got a little angry at you Monkie Jun 2013 #21
I didn't realize you were attacking me, giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #22
Response to Greenwalds Piece giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #30
I think that emails older than 180 days only require a subpoena Jarla Jun 2013 #31
Nope, certain things apply to US Persons & Non US Persons everyone within the US is considered a US giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #32
From the FBI's Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide Jarla Jun 2013 #35
as the other poster has shown, claiming something is misinformation does not make it so Monkie Jun 2013 #36
so the reality is you are appealing to authority and preaching blind trust Monkie Jun 2013 #37
I didn't preach to blind trust, nor is anything I said opinon based giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #41
im sorry, you did exactly that, blind trust, and you now offer no argument Monkie Jun 2013 #42
Whatever giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #43
i see you have nothing factual to say about my arguments Monkie Jun 2013 #44
I said back it up giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #45
i did not realise i had to back up commonly accepted facts but sure. Monkie Jun 2013 #46
a good example of ambiguity in the law, is the word Fair use Monkie Jun 2013 #47
You are attempting to try & muddy giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #48
you still address none of my points, the fact is there is no case law for FISA Monkie Jun 2013 #49
Bullshit giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #50
i put up, miss anonymous expert, and all you did was cry and cry "the law the law" Monkie Jun 2013 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Monkie Jun 2013 #52
Um, does anyone break a law and then tell you about it? randome Jun 2013 #4
Is there a real question from you? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #7
You said "Thank Gawd they never break laws". randome Jun 2013 #8
Easy RobertEarl Jun 2013 #9
So no government secrets ever? randome Jun 2013 #10
OK, I answered your question. Here's one for you. RobertEarl Jun 2013 #13
Private contractors, no. randome Jun 2013 #14
Secrecy RobertEarl Jun 2013 #15
So facts just kick your ass don't they? giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #17
so why wont you answer the real question, the lawyers questions?straw men and "facts" Monkie Jun 2013 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #23
again, if i had seen you had also responded to me after attacking the other person Monkie Jun 2013 #24
It's ok, we can feel foolish together giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #25
Awww RobertEarl Jun 2013 #26
Nooo giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #28
it is funny that someone that approves this data retention deletes their post Monkie Jun 2013 #38
Seriously, It was because I had called you a dick giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #40
"you went on about your ass, kangaroos and laser beams." datasuspect Jun 2013 #29
People don't get prosecuted for fucking torture Fumesucker Jun 2013 #2
Yeah, where were all of you complainers back in 1979? I didn't see you make a PEEP back then! MNBrewer Jun 2013 #6
Where were they in 2012? 2011? At what point did this drop off the radar? randome Jun 2013 #11
I know, so it' can't POSSIBLY be an issue NOW!!! MNBrewer Jun 2013 #12
Thanks giftedgirl. We need more info and less hype around here. From the posts i've read you okaawhatever Jun 2013 #16
Completely agree. n/t FSogol Jun 2013 #19
Thank you giftedgirl77 Jun 2013 #33
Actual information on DU? How quaint. MineralMan Jun 2013 #27
The Gov Facts, often turn out to be LIES usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #34
Thanks for posting some facts. HappyMe Jun 2013 #39
i call debunked, anonymous "expert" vs the top ACLU lawyer, and 2 constitutional lawyers Monkie Jun 2013 #53
Debate is fine but you don't seem willing to engage in it. randome Jun 2013 #54
i'm sorry, i really tried debate, but there was none to be had, sadly Monkie Jun 2013 #55
Wasted time railsback Jun 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FISA & EPCA the facts & n...