General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Using "them" as an excuse to post cold heartless shit doesn't excuse your cold heartlessness. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)Many of those "Oklahomans" didn't vote for the assholes who denied the Sandy aid. They voted for the other guy, they did not vote at all, they were not eligible to vote due to lack of age or citizenship.
Yet you persist in wanting to single out all "the Oklahomans" in the state for the "sins" of the minority of the state.
That's very Kim Jong Un-ish....like those camps where they punish three generations of a "bad" family. Get 'em all, even the innocents!
It's NOT cool.
And, FWIW, I voted for Brown's OPPONENT, Martha Coakley. Just because I said I did not vote for him doesn't mean I didn't vote at all--but your mind went straight to that "solution." What does that say about you, that you entertain the worst case first?
Further, I drove people to the polls, too. Probably close to fifty or sixty voters.
But per you, I should still be punished because I didn't have enough friends in the voting booth.
I can't believe you said this: If people don't bother to show up and vote, then it should hurt the people who don't bother to show up and vote. Never mind that it hurts those that DID exercise their civic duty, or couldn't due to ineligibility?
You do realize that your thesis is coming off as incredibly bigoted and stupid? Small-minded? Mean? Nasty? Selfish?
The blame needs to be put right where it belongs--on the POLITICIANS. Not the innocents.