Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
FIRED for what bigdarryl May 2013 #1
One question DainBramaged May 2013 #11
Don't forget his refusal to prosecute Bush Admin. war crimes. nt. premium May 2013 #21
Marijuana is illegal. Tell Congress to repeal federal laws against the use and possession of Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #45
Marijuana is legal here AgingAmerican May 2013 #70
What does your people able to smoke pot have to do with *FEDERAL* laws? Again, tell Congress Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #125
We don't need to have Congress do one single thing. We need a President truedelphi May 2013 #128
The attorney general does not "legalize" anything. He/she enforces the laws. Congress is responsible Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #131
Excuse me - please google re-scheduling of illegal substances. That ability is totally within the truedelphi May 2013 #132
You HAVE to get Congress on board with this first. No way around that. randome May 2013 #134
Too much money to be made off the WOD, premium May 2013 #138
Thank you. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #142
I'm educated enough, and your snarkiness doesn't change the fact: state laws do not trump federal Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #135
True, premium May 2013 #140
That's absolutely true, too! Obamacare, the enforcement of the Voting Rights Act... Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #143
Not something I would recommend, premium May 2013 #146
And it has. In the 70s, the feds held back transportation funding until states complied with Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #151
I never ever EVER said state law trumps fed laws. truedelphi May 2013 #158
Torture is illegal too, and so is massive bank fraud tularetom May 2013 #95
+1 villager May 2013 #98
Gonzales and his ilk saw to it that 'torture' never occurred, according to their definition. randome May 2013 #101
Again, which SPECIFIC banking laws were broken? The problem is that we deregulated the banking Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #126
Right now, massive amounts of robo signing is going on truedelphi May 2013 #130
There are currently 2000 legal MMJ dispensaries operating in the U.S. randome May 2013 #48
Agenda, like the NRA and the gungeon? DainBramaged May 2013 #65
Since you mentioned MMJ, that seems to be yours. randome May 2013 #72
This is utter nonsense which you keep repeating even after you are informed Bluenorthwest May 2013 #85
They were suspected of selling MJ illegally. Says it right in the link. randome May 2013 #90
Who was suspected? The entire program? The article quotes the DOJ as saying they had Bluenorthwest May 2013 #115
I agree it's a waste of resources. It's also politics. randome May 2013 #118
DOMA is enforced. It is the law of the land. No one has stopped enforcing that law. This is beyond Bluenorthwest May 2013 #127
Well, I confess to being confused about DOMA then. randome May 2013 #129
It is the law of the land, enforced in IRS code and every other area of law. Bluenorthwest May 2013 #139
Yeah, you give 'the gays' SOME rights and then they want more. Sheesh! randome May 2013 #150
IT-JUST-WON'T-STOP DainBramaged May 2013 #110
Well, OK....So Long As The SQUEAKY CLEAN Ones Are Left Alone SoCalMusicLover May 2013 #113
That is absolute nonsense AgingAmerican May 2013 #74
Can't find anything on that yet. Have a link? randome May 2013 #83
Actually what you said was Bluenorthwest May 2013 #88
Local authorities side with the patients, not the Feds AgingAmerican May 2013 #91
I think 'flagrantly violate' covers the 1000 foot law. randome May 2013 #92
No it does not. Your claim was of 'flagrant violation of Federal Law' and all marijuana business is Bluenorthwest May 2013 #105
Maybe I'm wrong about that but this looks like there is something on the books that covers it. randome May 2013 #109
Your claim is that some Medical Marijuana Clinics are 'clean' under Federal Law and that is bullshit Bluenorthwest May 2013 #120
Oh, come on, federal law is not changed at the state level. randome May 2013 #124
I'd say the letters he sends to the 2000 and the IRS actions against them and the other forms of Bluenorthwest May 2013 #133
I don't think ALL currently operating dispensaries have been served notice, have they? randome May 2013 #137
Of course AgingAmerican May 2013 #89
Yes, but it's in response to a new bill. randome May 2013 #94
The DOJ was shutting down dispensaries before this bill AgingAmerican May 2013 #96
Okay, so why are they picking on Oregon? Were SOME dispensaries allowed to remain open? randome May 2013 #103
Wow thanks for keeping my thread at the top I lives it veddy mooch DainBramaged May 2013 #111
I don't know anything about Oregon dispensaries AgingAmerican May 2013 #141
Also, going after the high profile dispensaries sends a very powerful message premium May 2013 #147
Every case I've read about in depth madokie May 2013 #108
I sure wouldn't say the DOJ is always to be trusted but, yeah... randome May 2013 #112
Agreed madokie May 2013 #116
He should be fired for not doing his job. He is occupying the AG's office to let the 5-yr statute of AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #26
Zing..../nt think May 2013 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #2
For being Obama's attorney general. geek tragedy May 2013 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #5
So people who think the banksters and BushCo should be prosecuted cui bono May 2013 #59
Do you believe that the banksters and the politicians who enabled them AgingAmerican May 2013 #75
I think i know... hughee99 May 2013 #13
They do not have a prosecution fetish the way many do. nt geek tragedy May 2013 #18
You're right, I don't know what's wrong with people. hughee99 May 2013 #51
Prosecution fetish??? cui bono May 2013 #63
Bizarre what lengths people will go to cover up for the republicans. AgingAmerican May 2013 #76
Deregulation is the crime here. It's not robbery when Congress says, 'Here. Take what you want.' randome May 2013 #84
Again... prosecution fetish??? Hardly. cui bono May 2013 #87
We both know the answer to that one, my friend. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #46
Exactly what Michael Eric Dyson said this morning on cilla4progress May 2013 #107
How about for refusing to prosecute the Bush Crime Family? premium May 2013 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #9
So the Bush admin. didn't use torture? premium May 2013 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #12
Bush Crime Family, premium May 2013 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #16
Trouble reading? premium May 2013 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #20
Good, use it. nt. premium May 2013 #24
This is A Democratic Site And The Bush Family IS A Crime Family HangOnKids May 2013 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #40
Please Keep Rolling Dude HangOnKids May 2013 #42
My pleasure, premium May 2013 #52
"He's dead Jim." Guy Whitey Corngood May 2013 #102
Oh noooooooooooooos. premium May 2013 #114
JEB? Is that you? hootinholler May 2013 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #61
No you're not stepping away hootinholler May 2013 #78
Yes, you do defend the Bushes AgingAmerican May 2013 #80
Yeah, because you don't want to learn anything, that would ruin your generalizations cui bono May 2013 #66
You don't hide it very well AgingAmerican May 2013 #79
Wait Aerows May 2013 #81
"I refuse to read anything beyond that from you." Yet you keep reading and replying. So which is it? Guy Whitey Corngood May 2013 #67
Apparently you never read the BCCI Report. blm May 2013 #55
Wow. I think you've gotten a little lost along the way. cui bono May 2013 #64
So all the abuses of the Bush administration were just leftist conspiracies? AgingAmerican May 2013 #77
I'm sorry but what the wall street bankers did wasn't illegal, and that's the sad truth and the Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #49
It's not theft when Congress opens the doors and says, 'Here. Take what you want.' randome May 2013 #53
That's right. The problem was created when Congress chose to abandon its constitutional Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #117
In so many ways, including the declaration of war. randome May 2013 #121
AMEN!! Thank you so much for exercising reason. Much appreciated. Regulatory oversight is a function Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #123
The looting was legal now? AgingAmerican May 2013 #82
You need a specific illegal action and you don't have one. The problem lies with our laws. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #122
Robo-signing AgingAmerican May 2013 #136
And do you know for certain that these illegalities haven't been investigated or prosecuted? Do you Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #149
In five years "nothing has been found yet" AgingAmerican May 2013 #155
Investigations usually take many years. You know that. And again, if what bankers did were legal Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #156
No AgingAmerican May 2013 #157
They just say the banks are 'too big to fail, to big to punish' and wave away accountability Bluenorthwest May 2013 #100
Actually, writing the White House and Eric Holder is the action we should be taking... Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #119
"an embarrassment to America" geek tragedy May 2013 #3
Even a broken clock is right twice per day OmahaBlueDog May 2013 #31
"embarrassment to America" is lazy, shrill hyperbole, nt geek tragedy May 2013 #33
Yeah, unlike this: cui bono May 2013 #69
Meh otohara May 2013 #6
Just who do you think the Republicans would confirm as a replacement? Zen Democrat May 2013 #7
Move Napolitano over from DHS OmahaBlueDog May 2013 #32
OH NO, another hit it then quit it OP. OP gone missing? JaneyVee May 2013 #15
I'm at work genius.... DainBramaged May 2013 #17
So am I. And 'genius' is correct. JaneyVee May 2013 #23
Me too, sshhh, don't tell anyone Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #27
And I'm Harvey Walbanger.... DainBramaged May 2013 #35
Hi Harvey! JaneyVee May 2013 #41
Fired for nonfeascence. Fired for misplaced priorities and resources. Fired for failing byeya May 2013 #25
And who will replace him, Gonzalez? JaneyVee May 2013 #29
Really? You'd do better if you'd go missing based on that reply. n/t cui bono May 2013 #73
Can't wait to see him squirming in his seat this afternoon. Peregrine Took May 2013 #22
Yikes. I was going to post that Reagan had appointed him to a judgeship in 1988 ... Smarmie Doofus May 2013 #28
I don't know about "NEEDS to be fired." He may be offered up as a sacrifice. OmahaBlueDog May 2013 #30
Good historical analysis. byeya May 2013 #34
Even Grumpy Cat can't save the OP from an UNREC. sinkingfeeling May 2013 #37
Grumpy Cat is not upset DainBramaged May 2013 #62
Well, some of the pro-gun people told you that a long time ago. aikoaiko May 2013 #38
Holder is an idiot. The Link May 2013 #39
Naw. He's very intelligent but acting like an idiot while being a corporate tool. think May 2013 #44
This OP is the true embarrassment. MjolnirTime May 2013 #43
Where and when did the OP ever say or give the impression Puzzledtraveller May 2013 #50
every third post MjolnirTime May 2013 #71
I don't like Obama, really? DainBramaged May 2013 #60
oh good god... chillfactor May 2013 #54
You Really Like To Tell People What To Do Don't You? HangOnKids May 2013 #86
WWWAHHHGGGVVVBBBLLLAAAGGHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH DainBramaged May 2013 #144
I am not a fan of Holder and thought he should have been let go.... NCTraveler May 2013 #57
He did nothing to be fired for. I think he should consider stepping down as soon as this stuff calms hrmjustin May 2013 #58
Holder has been very effective in protecting voting rights and effective on redistricting issues Gothmog May 2013 #68
But horrible at prosecuting thieves AgingAmerican May 2013 #93
Or prosecuting war crimes nt. premium May 2013 #104
An excellent point fellow aging person DainBramaged May 2013 #145
He should have been dumped after the first term, at the latest villager May 2013 #97
K&R - Holder has been a terrible attorney general from day one, yep, he should be fired quinnox May 2013 #99
Personally, I always thought he was a bad choice for the position. Nt Blue_In_AK May 2013 #106
Didn't he recuse himself from the AP applegrove May 2013 #148
Holder is not going anywhere. This AP story is about to blow up in the Republican's faces. Ikonoklast May 2013 #152
When I saw Sensenbrenner asking Holder about the AP story I got the sense he was trying to figure hrmjustin May 2013 #153
Holder is being rather coy, but he did recuse himself on this. Ikonoklast May 2013 #154
He passed "embarrassment" years ago. NaturalHigh May 2013 #159
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eric Holder NEEDS to be f...»Reply #18