Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Specifically, what is it Obama should do that he hasn't already done?" [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)77. Because Congress passed a law
Last edited Wed May 1, 2013, 10:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Same reason that anything else is illegal. Congress passed a law making it illegal.
And if the CIC tells the general to deal with this matter it is a legal order and he must follow it...
No.
Again, we prosecuted soldiers for torture at Abu Ghraib. They were just following orders, and we imprisoned them.
And by the way, the military has cargo flights all the time...put the prisoner with a guard on one of them and he goes home free
Did you forget the "with a guard" part of your solution?
And you're also running into the other problem, no countries have been willing to take the prisoners. That's why there's so many "cleared" people still at Gitmo - no country will take them.
And believe me, if they wanted to take them to be tortured in another country the congress would not have to approve it and no special appropriations would be needed.
That would be covered under funding already appropriated. The difference is you are proposing using money that was appropriated for something else to do something Congress explicitly forbade money to be spent on.
ETA: You are trying to repeat Iran-Contra.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
152 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Specifically, what is it Obama should do that he hasn't already done?" [View all]
babylonsister
May 2013
OP
He should offer to cut Social Security. Oh wait, he's already done that.
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#1
COLA not benefits. It was President Carter with Democrats in both chambers of Congress who
BlueCaliDem
May 2013
#6
Actually, while you are blaming Clinton for taxing SS benefits under certain circumstances,
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#9
Just pointing out the glaring differences between Carter, Clinton, Tip O'Neill, and Obama
BlueCaliDem
May 2013
#121
That's as nonsensical as saying that Edison should not get credit for modern illumination because
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#132
Edison didn't do squat. Tesla did it all, more efficient lights motors and more.
NYC_SKP
May 2013
#137
When one thinks PBO is the Anti-Christ, it's easier to think the worst of him and his motives
Hekate
May 2013
#98
I'm a senior who relies on Social Security for my income. The chained CPI will cut my income.
JDPriestly
May 2013
#99
You present the best argument against the chained CPI which is, in fact, a serious cut in our
JDPriestly
May 2013
#97
Actually, I think we have had two COLA increases. They weren't large, but I think we had them.
JDPriestly
May 2013
#125
Gee, thanks, I guess that makes it alright for other Democrats to do also... NOT /nt
still_one
May 2013
#106
Not saying that at all. Just debunking the myth that "no Democrat ever touched S.S. so Obama "
BlueCaliDem
May 2013
#124
From an accounting/budgeting perspective, chained CPI is technically not a cut. BUT . . .
markpkessinger
May 2013
#127
No matter what the President does/wants, the Republicans have vowed to oppose him,
winter is coming
May 2013
#2
A LOT of DUers would benefit from reading this in-depth and factually correct piece.
BlueCaliDem
May 2013
#3
the analysis is simple. he's expected to achieve results, and all failure is his fault.
unblock
May 2013
#7
The Republicans' recalcitrance and lack of cooperation or good will are problem enough. Obama
JDPriestly
May 2013
#107
He could reschedule Marijuana and tell his DOJ to quit attacking State licensed dispensaries.
Vincardog
May 2013
#13
He could have a Sec of Ed. that support free universal public education - not Duncan.
byeya
May 2013
#19
Did (a lot of) you folks even read this article, written about republican intransigence?
babylonsister
May 2013
#22
Background checks had >80% support, and you think a few phone calls will get taxes raised? (nt)
jeff47
May 2013
#58
It'd be worth a try, instead of sitting back and waiting for Divine intervention.
Octafish
May 2013
#70
It must have been the Republicans who opposed his appointment of TIMOTHY GEITHNER?
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#38
Why don't you answer, "Specifically, what is it Obama should do that he hasn't already done?"
AnotherMcIntosh
May 2013
#53
note-they were never supporters to start off with. Most would again vote for Nader given 1/2 chance
graham4anything
May 2013
#59
Holy crap. Cha, you should really make this into an OP. That WP story is astounding.
Number23
May 2013
#75
He could change position on privatizing public education. He could speak against safety net cuts
madfloridian
May 2013
#43
Seems to me like there are only a few possibilities. He is helpless against the nasty Republicans.
rhett o rick
May 2013
#111
Are you saying the president is powerless? Helpless against the overwhelming power
rhett o rick
May 2013
#79
My view is that at this point after so many failed attempts to make deals with congressional
JDPriestly
May 2013
#96
I don't know how he got sucked into this unilateral negotiating with the Republican Party??
kentuck
May 2013
#109
NOTHING. Had he done nothing, the Bush tax cuts would have expired. Even that was too much for him.
grahamhgreen
May 2013
#129
Usually, the anti-Obama folks don't have a plan for what they'd have done differently.
JoePhilly
May 2013
#135