Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you're displaying all of this outrage over CCPI to help the President [View all]bigtree
(86,016 posts)98. I'm not going to tolerate people who post to me just to ridicule and bait
. . . and nothing you can say can shame me away from defending myself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you're displaying all of this outrage over CCPI to help the President [View all]
veganlush
Apr 2013
OP
It will effect you absolutely. Not only in that your COLAS will be smaller
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#10
Uh, you said 'under 34K' which I thought applied to you because that figure is not
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#88
That poster is just making stuff up, that 34,000 number is pulled out of the ether
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#89
Wow, a string of insults and personal attacks, that really proves your point
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#91
there's some poster using your acct. who started this thread with an attack on the op's credibility
bigtree
Apr 2013
#110
I usually do regret arguing, but my concern, in those cases is for the recipient
bigtree
Apr 2013
#124
Some real revisionism there. Reagan did NOT increase benefits. What Reagan really did:
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#95
No, you are foisting off figures about voter attitude as being about turnout
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#96
You introduced this information as 'facts'. That's hostile. Because it is not about the subject
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#106
This blizzard of meaningless talking points certainly addressed my concerns!
cthulu2016
Apr 2013
#11
You were so busted.... show a little dignity, if you couldn't back up your implication
Dragonfli
Apr 2013
#74
You clearly have not been reading posts. Or you simply have chosen to attack any viewpoint
bluestate10
Apr 2013
#33
Perhaps, however the President ran that he wouldn't do it in 2012. Also, I have to wonder if it is
still_one
Apr 2013
#111
The complainers don't take responsibility for any mistake they make, how ever large
bluestate10
Apr 2013
#32
Pretty outrageous claim to make that anyone complaining about a chained CPI
PA Democrat
Apr 2013
#42
Are you "going Galt" on the "principled" set? The people who are the ones who
myrna minx
Apr 2013
#90
If you're counting on attracting 'independents' it is a bad choice to bad mouth liberals while
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#99
That's like blaming the general public because your turd candy shop went out of business.
Marr
Apr 2013
#135
Balderdash, fiddlesticks, and horse hockey. *I* voted in 2010, as did all dedicated Dem partisans.
scarletwoman
Apr 2013
#34
They cannot admit that their schemes supposedly to attract independents seems to have
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#77
Stock Obama Defense (and unfounded myth) #17: "we lost in 2010 because the left stayed home"
markpkessinger
Apr 2013
#35
So because we have divided government, Obama must give in to Republicans on C-CPI?
neverforget
Apr 2013
#37
"i never just threw all of my faith for the future onto the idea of living solely on SS." who cares?
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#76
They won't let go of the lie. They cannot admit their shitty policies don't attract "moderates" and
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#123
How about this, the President comes out and says SS and Medicare WILL NOT be part of the budget
still_one
Apr 2013
#108
Then what is so bad about the President supporting the overwhelming bipartisan national consensus?
Douglas Carpenter
Apr 2013
#141