Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Durbin wants new fiscal commission. Wants to raise retirement age, cut COLA. [View all]
What is wrong with that man? He wants it to be fashioned like the old fiscal commission, aka the Bowles/Simpson Commission, or the Catfood Commission.
Durbin Proposes Social Security Commission
Durbin wants the commission to make recommendations to make Social Security solvent for 75 years. The panel would be expected to consider increases in the payroll tax, a higher retirement age and a lower annual cost-of-living adjustment for beneficiaries.
"You would basically say to a commission, within a very limited time frame, to come up with a proposal for 75-year solvency of Social Security and then and this is important it would be referred to both chambers on an expedited procedure," Durbin told reporters at a Washington breakfast sponsored by The Wall Street Journal
Durbin's proposed 18-member commission would contain an equal number of Republicans and Democrats but require 14 votes to send a plan to Congress.
In a 1997 article at FAIR, John Hess said it very well. They are going to keep trying to "rescue"
Social Security until great harm is done.
Can Social Security Survive Another Rescue?
The rescue of Social Security has been a staple of American journalism for 20 years nowa story all the more remarkable in that Social Security has never been in peril except from its rescuers.
The rescues have all been based on faulty arithmetic. First, in 1977, the rescuers humbly confessed that they had made a mistake in adjusting benefits to inflation, as a result of which Social Security was threatening to go broke. (They never say the Army is threatening to "go broke," only that it needs more money to do the job that it's asked to do.) Not to worry. Amid the Yuletide hosannas of our massed punditry, our leaders found the courage to enact a correction that would, they swore, assure solvency into the 21st Century.
..In the early '80s, when income taxes were slashed and the great military buildup began, it was clear that some luxuries would have to be sacrificed, like housing, welfare, health and education. But Social Security was the promising target, one with a tax attached that bore mainly on the little folk. Because, however, the little people cherished their Social Security, a frontal attack by the Reagan White House was a political disaster, so a campaign of deception was mounted.
A bipartisan commission under Alan Greenspan went to work on the numbers, while the media developed an unprecedented campaign of vilification of the elderly. On magazine covers, in cartoons and columns and on broadcast commentaries innumerable, they were depicted as hogs, vampires, sharks, gorillas and card sharps scooping up the sustenance of the young. While the investment banker Peter G. Peterson led the media legions, Greenspan fabricated a hurricane warning. Multiplying one false assumption by another (for example, he assumed that the C.P.I. would rise nearly three times as fast as it actually did rise, while his private firm was forecasting an even smaller increase), he predicted that Social Security would go bankrupt in 1983.
Disappointed in Democrats like Durbin who are continuing this effort to cut the safety nets.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
58 replies, 6706 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (34)
ReplyReply to this post
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Durbin wants new fiscal commission. Wants to raise retirement age, cut COLA. [View all]
madfloridian
Mar 2013
OP
#1. Where does it specifically say Durbin wants to raise retirement age/cut COLA
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#2
It amazes me that when all these attempts fail and when they succeed the outcomes
Cleita
Mar 2013
#3
If he wants it to die, why doesnt he gut it up and kill it? He should be proposing raising the cap.
rhett o rick
Mar 2013
#12
Totally misleading thread title> Durbin does not say anywhere he wants to raise/cut anything
KittyWampus
Mar 2013
#4
It is so nice to see how open minded they are. They were not that open minded during the ACA debate
still_one
Mar 2013
#51
Durbin is a DOMA yes voter now claiming he was wrong to attack the rights of others
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2013
#18
I'm certain that Sen. Durbin's constituents are demanding that he cut Social Security.
99th_Monkey
Mar 2013
#19
Elections have consequences. Far Left Liberals should not have stayed at home in 2012.
Dr Fate
Mar 2013
#22
These party "leaders" like Obama and Durbin are third way Republicans and take their orders
Dragonfli
Mar 2013
#25
These solid DEMS are tricked, fooled or pragmatised into doing/not doing all these things.
Dr Fate
Mar 2013
#29
I thought we decided months ago that we could not imitate FDR or Truman b/c they are racist.
Dr Fate
Mar 2013
#31
One Step, Two Step, Third Way Misstep, by Durbin, again, and he ain't lonely, fellow donkey riders!
Dryvinwhileblind
Mar 2013
#30
3 of Durbin's 5 top campaign contributors are involved in Wall Street banking/finance.....
YoungDemCA
Mar 2013
#40
"an expedited procedure," huh? Sounds like he doesn't want anyone to get a good look
forestpath
Mar 2013
#44
"Disappointed in Democrats like Durbin who are continuing this effort to cut the safety nets"
MotherPetrie
Mar 2013
#52