Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
44. we aren't sinking in comparison to other countries. i've posted multiple times on the problems
Sat Mar 16, 2013, 10:27 PM
Mar 2013

with those international tests and the misrepresentation of results.

1. The US was never a leader in international test comparisons, not even when it was leading the world in science and technology. We have always been middling on them.

2. The tests in part compare apples to oranges.

For example, Shanghai is a high scorer on those tests. Except it's a Chinese city, not a country.

And a city with some unique characteristics, to wit: it's a very wealthy city, far more so than china as a whole, and academic elites are actively recruited to live there. Most of the grunt work, though, is done by migrant workers from the sticks, whose children until recently (and by recently, I mean a couple of years ago) were BARRED from attending school there through the hukou (family registration) system, and who still have difficulty accessing any education at all.

Similar situations obtain in many asian countries.

3. Another apples to oranges element is the difference in mandatory a/o free education. For example, in china education is mandatory only to 9th grade, and even then, it's not free, though there are some subsidies for the poor. Twenty percent of chinese students don't even complete 9th grade, and only half of chinese students even *enroll* in their equivalent of high school. So already you've got a sample biased for wealth, social position, & urban residence.

4. So far as western europe goes, we're comparing between countries where child poverty is (or was, before recent financial difficulties) basically in the low single digits to one where it's about 25%. Poverty *always and everywhere* = lower academic performance, ergo when 5% of one sample comes from poverty and 25% of another sample does, all else being equal the second sample will score lower.

These are just a few of the problems with those international comparisons.

They do not represent any evidence that the us is 'falling behind' the rest of the world.

Just imagine the lessons kids learn from this policy. madfloridian Mar 2013 #1
The allure and narrowness of making a final judgement on a single measure reteachinwi Mar 2013 #2
Great quote. madfloridian Mar 2013 #5
this is how I've had to approach my son's education liberal_at_heart Mar 2013 #8
I have a third grader d_r Mar 2013 #3
I agree 100% madfloridian Mar 2013 #4
Trust me Ohio has had lots of dumb testing adventures dsc Mar 2013 #6
Here's a story... ReRe Mar 2013 #7
+1 reteachinwi Mar 2013 #52
These end of year tests should not be viewed as... Blanks Mar 2013 #9
Ah, one test to determine your career. theaocp Mar 2013 #10
Do you think that's unique among educators? Blanks Mar 2013 #11
Teachers are already evaluated several times a year. The reformers must love your words. madfloridian Mar 2013 #14
That's a false accusation. Teachers ARE evaluated. Four times a year in my district. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #30
Who said 'teachers aren't evaluated'? Blanks Mar 2013 #61
"I don't of any profession where we just take their word for how good they are. " proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #62
You feel that those two completely different statements are equal? Blanks Mar 2013 #63
I don't see them as completely different statements. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #66
Even with your typo? Blanks Mar 2013 #68
That was YOUR typo. I copied and pasted from your post. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #73
I stand corrected. Have a nice day. eom Blanks Mar 2013 #74
" The simplest, most straightforward way" = false equivalence Reader Rabbit Mar 2013 #32
I believe students should emerge from each grade... Blanks Mar 2013 #35
Again, spoken like an engineer. Reader Rabbit Mar 2013 #39
Amen. madfloridian Mar 2013 #40
If I go to an oncologist and he/she... Blanks Mar 2013 #43
You do realize that... Reader Rabbit Mar 2013 #49
I don't want it to be the teachers fault. Blanks Mar 2013 #60
When you are developing a new widget reteachinwi Mar 2013 #53
We should have a system that can objectively demonstrate... Blanks Mar 2013 #59
That is not my experience. reteachinwi Mar 2013 #54
There are portfolios for severely disabled children. eom Blanks Mar 2013 #64
And there are many mildly disabled children who don't do well on these tests. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #65
I'm sure there are. Blanks Mar 2013 #67
No there are no such provisions. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #69
The rules vary from state to state... Blanks Mar 2013 #70
No they don't vary. It's a FEDERAL law. proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #71
My attorney/wife practices disability law... Blanks Mar 2013 #72
Well done. nt LWolf Mar 2013 #38
That illogic, in a nutshell, is why public education is on the ropes. LWolf Mar 2013 #12
How would you recommend evaluating educators? Blanks Mar 2013 #13
Public education is sinking because it is being defunded and dismantled. madfloridian Mar 2013 #15
I'm sure that's a factor in some places. Blanks Mar 2013 #16
See my post above to you. Yes, parents DO have responsibility for their children learning. madfloridian Mar 2013 #17
Fair enough. I can agree to disagree with you. Blanks Mar 2013 #18
Parents had their kids for years before they went to school. madfloridian Mar 2013 #19
I disagree about the training for tests comment. Blanks Mar 2013 #20
You are twisting my words around. madfloridian Mar 2013 #21
How is what I said different from what you meant? Blanks Mar 2013 #22
You said, I quote: madfloridian Mar 2013 #24
Perhaps if you didn't use 'that is just nonsense'... Blanks Mar 2013 #26
Hey, post a poll. I am backing off. madfloridian Mar 2013 #27
What do you want it to ask? Blanks Mar 2013 #28
Piaget reteachinwi Mar 2013 #55
My wife and I have discussed me teaching. Blanks Mar 2013 #58
Start with this: LWolf Mar 2013 #29
It's perfectly reasonable to evaluate someone's results. Blanks Mar 2013 #34
It doesn't really matter how many LWolf Mar 2013 #37
Many of the students I taught were in 10th grade. reteachinwi Mar 2013 #56
That makes sense to me. Blanks Mar 2013 #57
we aren't sinking in comparison to other countries. i've posted multiple times on the problems HiPointDem Mar 2013 #44
Could you provide a link? eom Blanks Mar 2013 #45
I'm not going to go and look for a link for each one of those claims again; if you're interested HiPointDem Mar 2013 #47
I'm not following your line of reasoning here. surrealAmerican Mar 2013 #23
Sort of. Blanks Mar 2013 #25
Because the only reason children fail is because they have bad teachers? proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #31
The way we learn that a child is failing... Blanks Mar 2013 #36
Some education on the history of standardized tests might be indicated. LWolf Mar 2013 #41
+1 proud2BlibKansan Mar 2013 #42
What is parent SES? eom Blanks Mar 2013 #46
socio-economic status. It's the best predictor of student performance out there. Not only in HiPointDem Mar 2013 #48
socio-economic status LWolf Mar 2013 #50
I agree...If no one showed up there would be NO one to test! Auntie Bush Mar 2013 #33
The Old Computer Adage: "No Doc, No Problem!" nt TheBlackAdder Mar 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ohio 3rd graders who fail...»Reply #44