General Discussion

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)

85. Where did I support the idea of high school girls

Thu Mar 14, 2013, 01:36 PM

Mar 2013

dressing in sexually provocative ways?

Bzzt.

Don't express sexual attraction to girls under the age of consent. Really not a hard rule to follow for non-creepy men.

It's not natural, and those of us who are not dead manage to do it. Because we're not creeps.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

224 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Women in shorts cause car to “crash” into pole [View all] dipsydoodle Mar 2013 OP

To wear socks or not to wear socks.... peace13 Mar 2013 #1

Socks look great with Mary Janes dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #4

Almost happened to me the other day... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #2

Watch out then you would have gotten the ticket. Your fault. southernyankeebelle Mar 2013 #9

Worth it... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #23

LOL southernyankeebelle Mar 2013 #45

Sue Ellen Mischke? nt Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2013 #3

Running the gauntlet. Brickbat Mar 2013 #5

Message auto-removed xilify Mar 2013 #6

High school girls? pintobean Mar 2013 #7

disgusting. backtoblue Mar 2013 #12

I didn't bother alerting pintobean Mar 2013 #14

Jury results:(only 2 votes to hide) geek tragedy Mar 2013 #15

Gotta love DU3 --those of us who object to men publicly lusting after children geek tragedy Mar 2013 #16

Yep, its Reddit with liberal leanings. sufrommich Mar 2013 #17

Yep. It's still worth calling the male entitlement mentality out geek tragedy Mar 2013 #22

Results of the jury: Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #36

You take #3, I'll take #6. nt msanthrope Mar 2013 #43

Yep. It's a bigger crime to object to sexual predation geek tragedy Mar 2013 #46

I hope Skinner realises that the jury system Whisp Mar 2013 #66

Jury system exists to make the site less work to administer. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #68

ah... seabeyond Mar 2013 #88

some of them will never 'get it', and that is pretty sad. Whisp Mar 2013 #94

Pedophilia, chervilant Mar 2013 #181

Thank you for coming back. :) redqueen Mar 2013 #185

i was number 6 backtoblue Mar 2013 #21

I wish I could say I was surprised. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #24

At least 13 years old pintobean Mar 2013 #25

You need to get a grip on reality. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #32

yeah, defend pedohphilia and wannabe statutory rapists! nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #47

This kind of over the top shit just makes you sound deranged. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #124

I'm flattered at the attention you've taken in me on a personal level geek tragedy Mar 2013 #130

Wow - the only thing he didn't mention in that post is that Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #132

Who knows what they say in PMs. They call me stuff like geek tragedy Mar 2013 #134

The Spanky and Alfalfa crowd will eventually be replaced with men who Sheldon Cooper Mar 2013 #137

I don't take them to be 'hypermasculine' geek tragedy Mar 2013 #139

Aw, it's cute how they use their macho culture bullshit to try to insult. redqueen Mar 2013 #140

Same ones who complain when other men don't take their geek tragedy Mar 2013 #141

You're welcome. I call 'em like I sees 'em. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #163

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service In_The_Wind Mar 2013 #162

PPR'D for being a previously banned troll. Rex Mar 2013 #147

you're right. backtoblue Mar 2013 #156

OMFG. The inconsistency is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #31

Adult men lusting after children is creepy and indicative geek tragedy Mar 2013 #34

Really? All the way from just looking to pedophilia in one post? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #38

Lusting after children and geek tragedy Mar 2013 #48

"just looking"? redqueen Mar 2013 #90

What you say is absolutely true. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #95

Noticing something and expressing that the type of 'noticing' you were doing was distracting enough redqueen Mar 2013 #104

The trends in this thread are, if nothing else, consistent. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #113

Um, no. redqueen Mar 2013 #116

Sexually aggressive. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #119

i have never, once, seen the word sexually aggressive used to imply whorish. you make the claim? seabeyond Mar 2013 #126

Funny how when a grown man leers at an underage girl, geek tragedy Mar 2013 #145

oh geez, so true. isnt it. consistent. and ALL the fuckin' time. repeat and rinse again. seabeyond Mar 2013 #151

how old are the people in that picture? I mean, when the picture was taken. Do you know? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #196

This discussion is about the creep xilify who upthread talked about how geek tragedy Mar 2013 #204

oh, you mean where "repeat disruptor" wrote "message auto-removed"? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #205

Jury voted 2-4 to leave alone and he had a very vocal defender. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #206

THANK GOD they got rid of meta, though, right? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #207

"Happy dance, happy dance!1!" "Thanks, Skinner!1!" pacalo Mar 2013 #208

sobriety goes much better with a few beers. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #209

Confession... pacalo Mar 2013 #212

Just wait until you see the next generation LittleBlue Mar 2013 #98

That crap has been around forever. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #101

Just one goddamned minute! Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #30

No one but creepy sexual predators has said it's okay geek tragedy Mar 2013 #37

Okay. I thought this would come: Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #40

you miss much of the point. seabeyond Mar 2013 #44

This isn't about that picture. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #49

I'm shutting down the stereophonic approach. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #59

There's some history with pintobean Mar 2013 #157

Ick. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #161

That explains some things. n/t chervilant Mar 2013 #189

So you agree that lusting after underage girls is ok? You can cuss me all you want. backtoblue Mar 2013 #63

Just stop. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #64

After that creep talked about how he ogled high school girls, geek tragedy Mar 2013 #80

I am not interested in hearing your reaction to a comment directed to someone else. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #84

This message was self-deleted by its author Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #83

let's play nice backtoblue Mar 2013 #159

Boys will be boys ... chervilant Mar 2013 #180

Creepy. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #8

What the hell is your problem? Brickbat Mar 2013 #10

He's not dead? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #35

Honestly expressing the impulse to be a statutory rapist geek tragedy Mar 2013 #50

He said that? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #58

Yeah, when people express lust for other people's bodies, they geek tragedy Mar 2013 #60

So, you won't do it? You will not point out the words he used... Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #62

Post has been deleted since the creep was vaporized by Skinner. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #67

His post was basically this: Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #74

Yeah, when that creep was ogling high school girls in "short skirts geek tragedy Mar 2013 #75

More extrapolation, more tangential discussion. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #78

You were defending a creep who was talking about geek tragedy Mar 2013 #79

Ogling high school girls is hardly equivalent to pedophilia. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #81

Where did I support the idea of high school girls geek tragedy Mar 2013 #85

It's the only point I've been arguing. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #86

You're the one who jumped into this thread to defend the guy. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #89

Actually, your ability to understand one word I've written is pretty close to zero. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #91

No, the problem is that I saw exactly through what you were geek tragedy Mar 2013 #93

No, the subject line was pintobean Mar 2013 #87

And he was booted. Probably justified based on other posts in other threads. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #99

Were you on the jury? pintobean Mar 2013 #108

Yes, I did check the TOS box. Tombstone says he was a previously banned troll. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #110

so a perv slobbering over young girls is okay with you. Whisp Mar 2013 #123

I said that? Where? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #125

it is there for all to read buzz. whisp about said it the way it is. see how foolish that post of seabeyond Mar 2013 #129

this is a pretty good example of that 'herd' thing, isn't it? Whisp Mar 2013 #146

throw in warrens dismissal with a thread of hair on fire wimminz and men. clever enough not seabeyond Mar 2013 #152

"clever enough not to defend"... what? to not defend "message auto-removed"? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #184

what did you mean then? Whisp Mar 2013 #131

Take off. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #133

I apologize that I embarrassed the shit out of you. n/t Whisp Mar 2013 #135

No need to apologize. You didn't embarrass him. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #136

I didn't really apologize. Just worded it a bit wrongly, but I'll leave it. n/t Whisp Mar 2013 #138

I got where you were going--was playing along. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #144

How mature. Are we back on the playground? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #142

then what Did you mean? Whisp Mar 2013 #148

For the record: JTFrog Mar 2013 #154

thanks, JT, and thanks jurors. n/t Whisp Mar 2013 #155

... LittleBlue Mar 2013 #149

oiy... Whisp Mar 2013 #11

I'm really curious to hear your reaction to the shit storm you created. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #33

Maybe something brilliant pintobean Mar 2013 #39

Okay. So he's a pig. Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #41

MIR Team (Skinner) banned xilify seabeyond Mar 2013 #42

And some people manage to out themselves in the process. nt geek tragedy Mar 2013 #51

when only listening to your buddies continually reinforce it is nature, biology, to get off on girls seabeyond Mar 2013 #52

Biology is their excuse. geek tragedy Mar 2013 #54

lol XRubicon Mar 2013 #192

lol XRubicon Mar 2013 #191

It appears to have been staged pintobean Mar 2013 #13

Good find dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #18

I love that they're holding hands. pintobean Mar 2013 #20

Because I'm used to seeing girls holding hands dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #27

Yes, women and girls used to hold hands all the time. polly7 Mar 2013 #178

Are you sure it wasn't the public display of same-sex affection? HereSince1628 Mar 2013 #19

That hadn't occurred to me dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #26

Actually... TeeYiYi Mar 2013 #65

no, as another poster noted, it was common for young women to hold hands or walk arm in arm HiPointDem Mar 2013 #127

You forgot "Breaking" Renew Deal Mar 2013 #28

Dang them wimmin! NaturalHigh Mar 2013 #29

There's no way that car "crashed into" that pole Fumesucker Mar 2013 #53

See post 13. dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #55

now and then. now, we photoshop to have a group of men blocking way, and intimidating seabeyond Mar 2013 #56

Its not a photoshop dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #57

You might appreciate these vids then... Lars39 Mar 2013 #61

Much appreciated dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #70

Didn't realize that about their name. Lars39 Mar 2013 #73

Car Crash??? They're causing a FULL SCALE DU MELTDOWN!!!! Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #69

Some people seem to be permanently in that state. Comrade Grumpy Mar 2013 #71

Well at least now dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #72

Some people simply can't contain their ecstasy over it being gone Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #115

Prepare to run the gauntlet. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2013 #150

i think that is more apt with what the women are doing in that picture. but hey... if yawl want seabeyond Mar 2013 #153

I'm sorry, maybe you can give me the cliffs notes version of the outrage. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #158

why are you so afraid of sea? Whisp Mar 2013 #160

I'm afraid of sea? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #165

Would that make you pintobean Mar 2013 #168

what does your post have ANYTHING to do with my reply to lumber? nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #166

I want to know more about the pornification photoshop conspiracy you mention upthread. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #169

Reference to photoshopping didn't account for there being two different pictures. dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #170

so, your post had nothing to do with my reply to lumder. gotcha. nt seabeyond Mar 2013 #179

wait.. you're suggesting that I replied to you in a somewhat non-linear fashion? Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #183

I seem to have missed all the fun. Beacool Mar 2013 #195

it's astounding. "message auto-removed" is causing quite the stir. Warren DeMontague Mar 2013 #197

Apparently so.............. Beacool Mar 2013 #199

It definitely looks staged. HappyMe Mar 2013 #76

Oh my GOD ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #77

I think back in the day it was HappyMe Mar 2013 #82

I was being slightly sarcastic ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #92

Oh, okay. HappyMe Mar 2013 #100

I don't think that way either ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #102

goony looking motherfucker... lol. Whisp Mar 2013 #96

prove to the others in the herd that they 'belong' and don't care what the women think. seabeyond Mar 2013 #103

Excellent, excellent point. It is a power play. nt redqueen Mar 2013 #106

Actually if I want to analyze ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #112

and that 'feet of clay' thing that society gives men to enjoy having Whisp Mar 2013 #114

Excellent point. ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #117

That picture speaks in two different languages, one for men and one for women. Whisp Mar 2013 #118

That it does ismnotwasm Mar 2013 #120

And you can discern all of that Summer Hathaway Mar 2013 #202

I totally agree.... sweetNsassy Mar 2013 #219

MalwareBytes blocked a tracking cookie at the source site MineralMan Mar 2013 #97

Oh, that's what that was. HappyMe Mar 2013 #107

It's a lot of malware out there. MineralMan Mar 2013 #109

I have that. HappyMe Mar 2013 #111

I want a doodad!! Sissyk Mar 2013 #128

Is it intrusive? Buzz Clik Mar 2013 #121

I don't find it intrusive. It does pop up a notice when it MineralMan Mar 2013 #122

My dad in his old age kept crashing into stuff oogling at women walking on the side walk. Cleita Mar 2013 #105

Strange how cause and effect works. Rex Mar 2013 #143

What a peculiar headline Small Accumulates Mar 2013 #164

Hilarious malaise Mar 2013 #167

and obviously the car didn't crash into the pole madokie Mar 2013 #171

Picture was taken 1937 dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #172

You mean like texting madokie Mar 2013 #173

Yes dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #174

Sweet Jebus, their knees are fully exposed! Major Nikon Mar 2013 #175

The car didn't crash, it is parked there. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #176

Cute pic! polly7 Mar 2013 #177

Why? chervilant Mar 2013 #182

Not sure if serious... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #186

Completely. chervilant Mar 2013 #188

Ok... Melon_Lord Mar 2013 #190

This is why we can't have nice things. Gravitycollapse Mar 2013 #193

This is why chervilant Mar 2013 #200

Sexism thrives everywhere. It is like a plague. Gravitycollapse Mar 2013 #201

Yep.. chervilant Mar 2013 #203

I happen to like vintage pictures dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #214

Thanks for telling me. chervilant Mar 2013 #216

I had to rec this, dd pintobean Mar 2013 #187

Well, it was 1937. Beacool Mar 2013 #194

Maybe it's the Doublemint Twins. TeeYiYi Mar 2013 #198

Four alerts in this thread... pacalo Mar 2013 #210

I think I pulled something Union Scribe Mar 2013 #211

I also noticed several jury results posted, too, but there haven't been any call-outs yet. pacalo Mar 2013 #213

The removed one alluded to dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #215

How noble of you. chervilant Mar 2013 #218

Anyone who finds that picture distressing or lewd should stay away from the internet. pacalo Mar 2013 #220

I was referring to the second pic n/t chervilant Mar 2013 #222

I don't think you were. n/t pacalo Mar 2013 #223

Agree to disagree chervilant Mar 2013 #224

Why are you blaming the car? Why do you hate cars? Orrex Mar 2013 #217

Nice team of horses. Coyotl Mar 2013 #221