Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Related to another OP, should the US have entered World War II earlier than it did? [View all]
The other OP contended that the European theater of WWII was a, perhaps singular, instance "of a time when OUR country's foreign policy has ever fought for the poor, the dispossessed, working people, or true victims of oppression in this world" without claiming that that is why we went to war. Obviously that only occurred after we were directly attacked, declared war on Japan and Germany declared war on us.Whether the other OP's contention is accurate or not is, of course, a discussion to be conducted in that thread. The purpose of this poll is somewhat different.
We all know of the brutality of Hitler on the European continent from 1933 on (particularly after the invasion of Poland in September 1939 and the declaration of war on Germany by Britain and France).
We also know that the US had a largely isolationist foreign policy at the time.
Opposition to the Lend-Lease bill was strongest among isolationist Republicans in Congress, who feared that the measure would be "the longest single step this nation has yet taken toward direct involvement in the war abroad." When the House of Representatives finally took a roll call vote on February 9, 1941, the 260 to 165 vote fell largely along party lines. Democrats voted 238 to 25 in favor and Republicans 24 in favor and 135 against.
The vote in the Senate, which took place a month later, revealed a similar partisan divide. 49 Democrats (79 percent) voted "aye" with only 13 Democrats (21 percent) voting "nay." In contrast, 17 Republicans (63 percent) voted "nay" while 10 Senate Republicans (37 percent) sided with the Democrats to pass the bill.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
I think that there was no chance that the US would have declared war on Germany and/or Japan prior to Pearl Harbor given sentiments at the time. I do not fault FDR. It was hard enough just to get the Lend-Lease program past Congress. A declaration of war before Pearl Harbor would have been politically impossible.
But would it have been the right thing to do? The question for this poll is:
Was the US right not to get involved in a war with Germany when it invaded Poland in 1939, France in 1940 or the USSR in 1941?
5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
We were right not to go to war earlier. We did not know how bad the Nazis were. | |
0 (0%) |
|
We were right not to go to war earlier. The true nature of the Nazis does not matter. It was none of our business unless they attacked us. | |
0 (0%) |
|
I am a pacifist. War is never an option regardless of the circumstances. | |
0 (0%) |
|
We did know or should have known how bad the Nazis were. We should have entered the war earlier. | |
3 (60%) |
|
The ubiquitous "Other". | |
2 (40%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Related to another OP, should the US have entered World War II earlier than it did? [View all]
pampango
Mar 2013
OP
I wouldn't say I studied it closely but my understanding is that we realized limited benefits and
Cary
Mar 2013
#24
I think history shows that bombing civilians increases their hatred and will to fight rather than
pampango
Mar 2013
#29
I agree. In fact I posted that FDR had no choice given the sentiments of the time.
pampango
Mar 2013
#7
We should have at least used the Neutrality Act to prosecute Prescott Bush and other Wall St
leveymg
Mar 2013
#5
That's an important quote, but it was Sen. Borah who said it, according to Rob't Parry
leveymg
Mar 2013
#17
All very interesting and plausible possibilities. Just goes to show how unpredictable war
pampango
Mar 2013
#23
The Czarist Okhrana precipitated the assassination plot of the Austrian Archduke in Sarajevo.
leveymg
Mar 2013
#19
That's a toughie, but a big part would be to render Archduke Ferdinand's killing irrelevant
Taverner
Mar 2013
#35
There is no guarantee that an earlier entry to the war would have helped the allied cause.
JVS
Mar 2013
#16
I think you are right. It took us a long time to crank up military production and draft and train
pampango
Mar 2013
#26
I agree that we were not ready - even in 1941. France and Britain were not ready either but
pampango
Mar 2013
#36
If France & England had been smarter they would have beaten Germany in 1940.
GreenStormCloud
Mar 2013
#37
Actually, had Hitler not declared war on us, it would have been a hard sell to fight him.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Mar 2013
#33
What if we had had a strong army in 1939? Would entering the war at that point have been
pampango
Mar 2013
#38
I'm fundamentally an isolationist, but in the case of WW-II we royally screwed up.
talkingmime
Mar 2013
#39