Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 05:31 PM Feb 2013

Companies are dropping health coverage for spouses to cut costs [View all]

By denying coverage to spouses, employers not only save the annual premiums, but also the new fees that went into effect as part of the Affordable Care Act. This year, companies have to pay $1 or $2 “per life” covered on their plans, a sum that jumps to $65 in 2014. And health law guidelines proposed recently mandate coverage of employees’ dependent children (up to age 26), but husbands and wives are optional. “The question about whether it’s obligatory to cover the family of the employee is being thought through more than ever before,” says Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health. See: When your boss doesn’t trust your doctor.

While surcharges for spousal coverage are more common, last year, 6% of large employers excluded spouses, up from 5% in 2010, as did 4% of huge companies with at least 20,000 employees, twice as many as in 2010, according to human resources firm Mercer. These “spousal carve-outs,” or “working spouse provisions,” generally prohibit only people who could get coverage through their own job from enrolling in their spouse’s plan.

Such exclusions barely existed three years ago, but experts expect an increasing number of employers to adopt them: “That’s the next step,” Darling says. HMS, a company that audits plans for employers, estimates that nearly a third of companies might have such policies now. Holdouts say they feel under pressure to follow suit. “We’re the last domino,” says Duke Bennett, mayor of Terre Haute, Ind., which is instituting a spousal carve-out for the city’s health plan, effective July 2013, after nearly all major employers in the area dropped spouses.

But when employers drop spouses, they often lose more than just the one individual, when couples choose instead to seek coverage together under the other partner’s employer. Terre Haute, which pays $6 million annually to insure nearly 1,200 people including employees and their family members, received more than 20 new plan members when a local university, bank and county government stopped insuring spouses, according to Bennett. “We have a great plan, so they want to be on ours. All we’re trying to do is level the playing field here,” he says.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-your-boss-is-dumping-your-wife-2013-02-22

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the past Helen Darling has advised Republican Senators... NCTraveler Feb 2013 #1
Drop employer based health insurance kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #2
+1. n/t Laelth Feb 2013 #9
single payer is the only way liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #10
Can I call BS on this?? RockaFowler Feb 2013 #3
The ACA adds an extra fee per person covered. dkf Feb 2013 #5
I am a stay at home mom and use to be on my husband's insurance. liberal_at_heart Feb 2013 #11
Keep the worker alive, the spouse and kiddies are expendable Warpy Feb 2013 #4
Now stay at home moms will have to work to get health care dkf Feb 2013 #6
Terre Haute is paying $5000/year for each person covered. sounds kind of overpriced msongs Feb 2013 #7
Time for Universal Healthcare. blm Feb 2013 #8
This may prove how inefficient the "private" market is. dkf Feb 2013 #12
EVERYONE PLEASE READ THIS PREVIOUS POST I MADE! IMPORTANT! antigop Feb 2013 #13
Wow that article called it... dkf Feb 2013 #14
If the spouse has to go to the exchange, they *may not* be eligible for subsidies. nt antigop Feb 2013 #15
I tried to get everyone's attention on this when I posted it, but the thread sank. nt antigop Feb 2013 #16
I'm re-reading your post and I didn't fully understand how bad this is the first time around. dkf Feb 2013 #19
yes, it's BAD for families..especially if spouse/dependents get insurance through spouse's employer. antigop Feb 2013 #20
Husband, wife, and kid may end up on THREE DIFFERENT FRIKKIN' PLANS! nt antigop Feb 2013 #17
But did you also see how plans that have good coverage are going to be deluged dkf Feb 2013 #21
It's going to be one big cluster---- and may make us lose the 2014/2016 elections antigop Feb 2013 #22
move to universal health care bigapple1963 Feb 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Companies are dropping he...