Targeted killings: OK if Obama does it? [View all]
Civil libertarians have worried that some of President Obamas comparatively hawkish national security policies are silencing liberal Democrats who would have opposed such measures under President Bush or another Republican. Now theres new evidence that Obamas support for such policies isnt just silencing them its winning them over.
Thats the finding of new research by Brown University political scientist Michael Tesler, who studies what he calls the racialization of political issues in the age of Obama: mainly, the way voters attitudes about race can make them more or less likely to support policies once they know those policies are supported by Obama. Last year he made headlines with an American Journal of Political Science article about the way racial attitudes shaped opinions on the Affordable Care Act.
.......
Coincidentally I learned of Teslers research around the time the New York Times revealed the existence of a secret Obama kill list authorizing the use of drones and other measures to kill suspected terrorists last June. I wondered whether Obama supporters would be more likely to back such measures under this president than they would otherwise. I asked Tesler if he had any data on national security, and he promised to add some questions on those issues to his ongoing polling in partnership with the Internet polling group YouGov. In another coincidence, he sent me his findings the week after NBCs Michael Isikoff revealed the unconvincing Office of Legal Counsel white paper summarizing the legal grounds for targeted assassination of American citizens.
In a YouGov poll of 1,000 voters last August, Tesler found significantly more support for targeted killing of suspected terrorists among white racial liberals (i.e., those liberal on issues of race) and African Americans when they were told that Obama supported such a policy than when they were not told it was the presidents policy. Only 27 percent of white racial liberals in a control group supported the targeted killing policy, but that jumped to 48 percent among such voters who were told Obama had conducted such targeted killings (which Tesler refers to as the Obama cue.) He found a similar difference among African Americans, but cautions that the sample size, of 60 in a control group and another 60 who were given the Obama cue, is small. We can be pretty confident that blacks are more supportive when given the Obama cue, but not at all confident about how precisely large that difference is, he told me via email.
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/targeted_killings_ok_if_obama_does_it/