Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 07:08 AM Feb 2013

The Richest 1 Percent Have Captured 121 Percent Of Income Gains During The Recovery [View all]

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/12/1579211/1-percent-121-gains/


Last year, economist Emmanuel Saez estimated that the richest 1 percent of the U.S. captured a whopping 93 percent of the income gains in 2010, as the U.S. was emerging from the Great Recession. Saez is now back with updated numbers from 2011, and they make the picture look even grimmer:

From 2009 to 2011, average real income per family grew modestly by 1.7% (Table 1) but the gains were very uneven. Top 1% incomes grew by 11.2% while bottom 99% incomes shrunk by 0.4%. Hence, the top 1% captured 121% of the income gains in the first two years of the recovery. From 2009 to 2010, top 1% grew fast and then stagnated from 2010 to 2011. Bottom 99% stagnated both from 2009 to 2010 and from 2010 to 2011.

How is it possible for the 1 percent to capture more than all of the nation’s income gains? The number is due to the fact that those at the bottom saw their incomes drop. As Timothy Noah explained in the New Republic, “the one percent didn’t just gobble up all of the recovery during 2010 and 2011; it put the 99 percent back into recession.”

Saez added that “In 2012, top 1% income will likely surge, due to booming stock-prices, as well as re-timing of income to avoid the higher 2013 top tax rates…This suggests that the Great Recession has only depressed top income shares temporarily and will not undo any of the dramatic increase in top income shares that has taken place since the 1970s.”
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's even more depressing than this news deutsey Feb 2013 #1
Without a President committed to the middle class it could have been way worse! nt Bonobo Feb 2013 #2
<blink> Fumesucker Feb 2013 #5
Like I been telling people who complain about the rise in the cost of living-- Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #27
Who cares? Cal Carpenter Feb 2013 #3
Boy did I get my ass kicked around for expressing similar thoughts. Jackpine Radical Feb 2013 #28
Well you can't offend the Third Wayers around here........ socialist_n_TN Feb 2013 #35
The "Recovery" made 99% of America poorer kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #41
There is a simple reason they aren't "all over it"........ socialist_n_TN Feb 2013 #42
I'm sorry.... but AlbertCat Feb 2013 #4
I did put this quote in the OP Fumesucker Feb 2013 #6
Someone who can't be bothered to read past headlines... TheMadMonk Feb 2013 #13
Someone who can't be bothered to read past headlines... AlbertCat Feb 2013 #16
"Math is hard" -Barbie Fumesucker Feb 2013 #17
"Math is hard" -Barbie AlbertCat Feb 2013 #18
Yes, the 1% got it all of the gains and then some Fumesucker Feb 2013 #20
If you have $100 to your name and the bill to fix your car comes to $121 AlbertCat Feb 2013 #22
Percentages over 100 are used a lot in math heavy subjects like engineering Fumesucker Feb 2013 #30
This is not engineering AlbertCat Feb 2013 #31
they got all the gains, plus some of what *you* already had. your loss they also gained. + HiPointDem Feb 2013 #47
"then it goes on like a math word problem.... who wants to read any further?" redqueen Feb 2013 #21
This is a seriously fucking depressing thread. AlbertCat Feb 2013 #23
You misunderstand the problem. redqueen Feb 2013 #24
It is this kind of lack of critical thinking skills, or even the faintest intellectual curiosity AlbertCat Feb 2013 #32
You Could Reach That Number By Confiscating The Wealth Lost By The Losers TheMastersNemesis Feb 2013 #26
Your reply and arguments are a perfect example of how this happened. n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2013 #34
Why did we think it would be differet this time around? Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #7
Without major economic re-organization Cal Carpenter Feb 2013 #11
Government can't force businesses to create opportunity. DaveJ Feb 2013 #8
Agree. So GOVERNMENT should create opportunity....... socialist_n_TN Feb 2013 #36
So infuriating! libtodeath Feb 2013 #9
du rec. nt xchrom Feb 2013 #10
Priorities, we haz them. raouldukelives Feb 2013 #12
How is it possible for the 1 percent to capture more than all of the nation’s income gains? G_j Feb 2013 #14
This is exactly why laundry_queen Feb 2013 #15
Gotta return the narrative to the 1% versus the 99%. It appears that is the only way these problems Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #19
"Economic recovery in the US actually made 99% of Americans poorer, kenny blankenship Feb 2013 #25
So depressing. TDale313 Feb 2013 #29
K&R woo me with science Feb 2013 #33
But of fucking course. lonestarnot Feb 2013 #37
Saw that, got pissed upi402 Feb 2013 #38
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #39
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #40
kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #43
Kick woo me with science Feb 2013 #44
All of something adds up to 100%. I don't dispute economic inequity, it most be eliminated. bluestate10 Feb 2013 #45
I suppose if you are innumerate that doesn't make sense Fumesucker Feb 2013 #46
The 1% got 121% of the total gains, because the rest of us 99% lost 21% of those gains. reformist2 Feb 2013 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Richest 1 Percent Hav...