Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: See, Here's the Thing. [View all]

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
8. Much better than how a Mittens presidency would look:
Sun Feb 10, 2013, 10:20 PM
Feb 2013


Peace in Space: Why Obama Is Right (and the Far Right Is Wrong)


What is it about space that makes the hard right go goofy? First it was Newt Gingrich and his promise of a lunar colony before the end of his second term (which looks especially bad now that the moon base is actually a better statistical bet than the Gingrich campaign). Now it’s John Bolton and John Yoo taking to the pages of the New York Times to argue against the Obama Administration’s plans to limit the militarization of space.

Bolton, you’ll remember, is America’s oddly Lorax-like former ambassador to the U.N. who was perfectly suited to his job except for the fact that he didn’t actually like the U.N. Yoo is the waterboarding apologist who helped author the Bush Administration’s so-called “torture memos” in 2003, arguing that what American war planners called “enhanced interrogation techniques” and what much of the rest of the world called “against the law” was really, truly O.K. But that was then.

What’s got Bolton and Yoo unsheathing their light sabers this week is President Obama’s decision to follow the European Union’s code of conduct for space, an accord that calls for “prevent[ing] outer space from becoming an area of conflict.” It would achieve this through such probably not-crazy measures as preventing interference with another nation’s space assets, enhancing the “safety, security and predictability of outer-space activities,” and encouraging “transparency and confidence-building measures.” It would also try to limit the increase in space debris — which is the cosmic equivalent of laws against littering. So you wouldn’t think there’s much to object to here. But you’re not Yoo — or Bolton...


http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/12/peace-in-space-why-obama-is-right/

Never forget Mittens wanted a hot war with both Syria and Iran; that Cheney of PNAC infamy was his security advisor; and Bolton was in his gang. We dodged WW3 with Obama's re-election.


See, Here's the Thing. [View all] sheshe2 Feb 2013 OP
I Don't Think Any President Gets Much Press for NOT Going to War dballance Feb 2013 #1
You know what's bizarre? ProSense Feb 2013 #2
Sigh, They are the Ship of Fools. sheshe2 Feb 2013 #3
Much better than how a Mittens presidency would look: freshwest Feb 2013 #8
“prevent outer space from becoming an area of conflict.” sheshe2 Feb 2013 #26
Well, you know, Mitt allegedly has an extra-terrestrial home. Just sayin' freshwest Feb 2013 #27
With that title, I can only imagine. sheshe2 Feb 2013 #33
Yeah, I think what people prefer is sibelian Feb 2013 #6
Yes, DU has its coterie of constitutional scholars. randome Feb 2013 #13
And it's often the same ones hating on the U.N. and thus enabling the evilness of the IMF!! patrice Feb 2013 #28
+1 treestar Feb 2013 #36
I was glad to hear of that Enrique Feb 2013 #4
Our President is anti-war; don't you see that? babylonsister Feb 2013 #5
if he armed the Syrian rebels Enrique Feb 2013 #9
Are you ProSense Feb 2013 #10
i am against arming them Enrique Feb 2013 #14
Oh goody ProSense Feb 2013 #17
you're setting up a fictitious scenario, and criticizing people for doing something they didn't do BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #42
i was actually demonstrably wrong Enrique Feb 2013 #44
oh ok..thank you BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #45
Has he armed the Syrian rebels? babylonsister Feb 2013 #11
no Enrique Feb 2013 #15
I prefer this... sheshe2 Feb 2013 #21
i agree Enrique Feb 2013 #23
Speak softly and carry a big stick sheshe2 Feb 2013 #24
Yes, he is. Kath1 Feb 2013 #39
k&r nt steve2470 Feb 2013 #7
Not engaging in a 3rd war is now "moving the ball significantly in the Progressive direction", huh. Bonobo Feb 2013 #12
+1 Sadness exceeded only by its outrageous, enraging absurdity. nt woo me with science Feb 2013 #16
The OP ProSense Feb 2013 #18
Thanks for bringing that exerpt over, ProSense... sheshe2 Feb 2013 #22
You do realize you are implying that progressives and I would assume A Simple Game Feb 2013 #19
First, I have implied nothing. I have posted excerpts from a Linked blog by "immasmartypants". sheshe2 Feb 2013 #32
Well said. Quite a reach there. BTW: freshwest Feb 2013 #34
An Obama Kitteh! Sweet! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #41
the flip side of this story is that Hillary pushed for the intervention Enrique Feb 2013 #20
If McCain had been elected Mr.Bill Feb 2013 #25
Absolutely. Kath1 Feb 2013 #31
+1 freshwest Feb 2013 #35
That's what I like about Obama. Kath1 Feb 2013 #29
Thank you Kath! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #37
He is quietly dedicated to getting this turned around. Not a bully as some appear to want. freshwest Feb 2013 #38
Such a refreshing response to conflict after Bush and Reagan. Kath1 Feb 2013 #40
you are so right...so is the post you're replying to. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2013 #43
Thanks for the positive news. The drones and excessive surveillance still need fixing. JDPriestly Feb 2013 #30
President Obama is only getting Cha Feb 2013 #46
P.S. Thanks for Cha Feb 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»See, Here's the Thing.»Reply #8