Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: See, Here's the Thing. [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)8. Much better than how a Mittens presidency would look:
Peace in Space: Why Obama Is Right (and the Far Right Is Wrong)
What is it about space that makes the hard right go goofy? First it was Newt Gingrich and his promise of a lunar colony before the end of his second term (which looks especially bad now that the moon base is actually a better statistical bet than the Gingrich campaign). Now its John Bolton and John Yoo taking to the pages of the New York Times to argue against the Obama Administrations plans to limit the militarization of space.
Bolton, youll remember, is Americas oddly Lorax-like former ambassador to the U.N. who was perfectly suited to his job except for the fact that he didnt actually like the U.N. Yoo is the waterboarding apologist who helped author the Bush Administrations so-called torture memos in 2003, arguing that what American war planners called enhanced interrogation techniques and what much of the rest of the world called against the law was really, truly O.K. But that was then.
Whats got Bolton and Yoo unsheathing their light sabers this week is President Obamas decision to follow the European Unions code of conduct for space, an accord that calls for prevent[ing] outer space from becoming an area of conflict. It would achieve this through such probably not-crazy measures as preventing interference with another nations space assets, enhancing the safety, security and predictability of outer-space activities, and encouraging transparency and confidence-building measures. It would also try to limit the increase in space debris which is the cosmic equivalent of laws against littering. So you wouldnt think theres much to object to here. But youre not Yoo or Bolton...
http://ideas.time.com/2012/03/12/peace-in-space-why-obama-is-right/
Never forget Mittens wanted a hot war with both Syria and Iran; that Cheney of PNAC infamy was his security advisor; and Bolton was in his gang. We dodged WW3 with Obama's re-election.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And it's often the same ones hating on the U.N. and thus enabling the evilness of the IMF!!
patrice
Feb 2013
#28
you're setting up a fictitious scenario, and criticizing people for doing something they didn't do
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2013
#42
Not engaging in a 3rd war is now "moving the ball significantly in the Progressive direction", huh.
Bonobo
Feb 2013
#12
First, I have implied nothing. I have posted excerpts from a Linked blog by "immasmartypants".
sheshe2
Feb 2013
#32
He is quietly dedicated to getting this turned around. Not a bully as some appear to want.
freshwest
Feb 2013
#38
Thanks for the positive news. The drones and excessive surveillance still need fixing.
JDPriestly
Feb 2013
#30