Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Notice to the Democratic party.... [View all]cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)76. Well Then - We Will Have To Agree To Disagree
eom
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
LOL. I'm neither for nor totally against at this point, but this is just silly.
TwilightGardener
Feb 2013
#1
You assume gramps would haved chosen sarah baracuda is he were running against Hillary.
sadbear
Feb 2013
#19
if she wants the nomination she willl have to earn it....just like others running nt
msongs
Feb 2013
#4
The replies are reflections of the tone of the post, not of feelings about Hillary
HERVEPA
Feb 2013
#14
I'm a big Hillary fan, but this is ridiculously provocative... Give it a rest, kindly...
hlthe2b
Feb 2013
#10
I hate to say it, but most of politics is playing on one's feelings about a candidate's character.
glowing
Feb 2013
#45
I'm fine with Hillary, BUT, I'll support the most liberal candidate. Hillary a bit hawkish for me.
Zen Democrat
Feb 2013
#27
The media is already trying to hype 2014 because it makes them tons of money
Cynicus Emeritus
Feb 2013
#34
So - If There Is A Better Candidate Than Clinton - You Would Deny The Country A Better President?
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#51
There is no better candidate than Hillary, (except for Biden if she doesn't run)
Auntie Bush
Feb 2013
#61
That Is Your Opinion And Your Opinion Only - Not Everyone Will Agree With That Opinion
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#62
Disagree - The Tone Of The Original Post Was Intransigence - That Typically Sets Poorly With Many
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#64
Do you really think Elizabeth Warren would have voted to authorize a war
coalition_unwilling
Feb 2013
#80
As Stated Up-Thread - The OP Was One Of Intransigence - Hillary Or Else - That Does Not Sit Well
cantbeserious
Feb 2013
#72
Criminey. We're only three months after the last presidential election
Seeking Serenity
Feb 2013
#56
How about we wait until(if) she announces before we go bat shit crazy around here?
yourout
Feb 2013
#57
I guess that means you're giving her a pass for her vote to authorize
coalition_unwilling
Feb 2013
#77
I agree with you 100%. There is going to be a fight if some on DU persist in their limited
bluestate10
Feb 2013
#83
Oh good God, DU3 and its jury system is going to be a fucking spectacle to behold come primaries.
JVS
Feb 2013
#94
LOL who's trying to "gain control of the Democratic Party and set it marching to their own agenda"
limpyhobbler
Feb 2013
#103
Sorry, but I'm still trying to figure out how someone not posting under his/her real name
patrice
Feb 2013
#104