Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 09:39 AM Feb 2013

Charts: What if Obama spent like Reagan? [View all]

In 10 of the past 12 quarters, total government spending and investment has fallen, dragging down the Obama economy. That’s in large part because state and local cutbacks have been so severe, but it’s also because federal spending and investment has, on the whole, been falling since 2010.

That made me curious: How does government spending and investment during Obama’s first term compare to Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush’s first terms? ... Whereas total government spending dropped in 10 out of the 16 quarters that comprised Obama’s first term, it rose in 13 out of Reagan’s first 16 quarters, and 13 out of Bush’s first 16 quarters.



Or, to put it differently, over Obama’s first term, falling government spending and investment snipped, on average, .11 percentage points of GDP off of (annualized) quarterly growth. During Reagan’s first term, it added .68 percentage points, and during Bush’s first term, it added .52 percentage points.



...these graphs simply establish a basic fact about Obama’s term: While deficits have indeed been high, government spending and investment has been falling since 2010. This is, in recent presidential administrations, a simply unprecedented response to a recession. Just for fun, I took Obama’s GDP growth, netted out the effect of government spending and investment, and then added the total government spending and investment numbers — which include state and local government — from Reagan’s first term. The result is a significantly better economy, with growth since 2010 averaging 3.2 percent rather than 2.4 percent.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/31/charts-what-if-obama-spent-like-reagan/

None of which will stop republicans from constantly referring to 'big-spending Democrats'.

It is interesting to see how much better off the economy would be under a 'big-spending republican' like the much revered (in republican circles anyway) Reagan. GDP growth now would be about 3% rather than the most recent -0.1%.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm convinced that 7-8% unemployment is the new norm as long as we keep destroying public sec jobs. JaneyVee Feb 2013 #1
Lower the reirement age to include workers nobody wants. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #7
For younger readers, WPA means Work Progress Association. Wikipedia it. xtraxritical Feb 2013 #12
K&R Champion Jack Feb 2013 #2
Every problem this country has is rooted in a Reagan policy or program. liberal N proud Feb 2013 #3
It wasn't just Reagan,...it was Republicans who were against The New Deal. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #8
The actions taken during the Reagan years are direct contributors to our current problems. liberal N proud Feb 2013 #10
The Reagan years SUCKED but Republicans did historical revisionism.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #11
One way to read this is that government spending and investment (in the US) is good for gdp. geckosfeet Feb 2013 #4
or george w bu$h*????? spanone Feb 2013 #5
I've known since around 1980 that things are always more SheilaT Feb 2013 #6
They understand. It's their JOB to sell the lie.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2013 #9
So is your suggestion that we go back to spending 33-35% of GDP? mostlyconfused Feb 2013 #13
can haz chartz cthulu2016 Feb 2013 #14
Annual growth in spending: Reagan - 6.8%, GWB - 7.7%, Clinton - 3.5%, Obama - 1.4%. pampango Feb 2013 #15
Charts can say a lot of things. That one could suggest Reagan started fixing the problem mostlyconfused Feb 2013 #16
If you think it suggests "Reagan started fixing the problem", you must be a big Obama fan. pampango Feb 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charts: What if Obama spe...