Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
So will the patient be able to buy them separately? Anyone know. southernyankeebelle Feb 2013 #1
AFAIK, the insurance company will have to provide them for free to the employee. CTyankee Feb 2013 #16
Thanks CTYank. I think its so confusing. southernyankeebelle Feb 2013 #18
I almost freaked when I read the scary headlines that Obama had caved to the religious CTyankee Feb 2013 #19
We don't have to worry no matter what they will find something wrong with it. southernyankeebelle Feb 2013 #20
Did they provide contraceptive coverage before the reform act? Autumn Feb 2013 #2
No LeftInTX Feb 2013 #4
No--but now, these employees are covered by their insurance companies directly for bc. msanthrope Feb 2013 #10
at least one did Enrique Feb 2013 #15
It is one step forward, Control-Z Feb 2013 #3
Coverage is provided by the insurance company, not the employer for institutions claiming this. msanthrope Feb 2013 #7
Calm down? Control-Z Feb 2013 #13
I'm bettin' this includes Baptist Hospital in Nashville, too. Lars39 Feb 2013 #5
Baptist would have to claim that they are primarily a religious institution, but their insurer would msanthrope Feb 2013 #8
Unrec for vagueness--these employees are directly covered by their insurance companies, not the msanthrope Feb 2013 #6
Oh well atreides1 Feb 2013 #9
from the New York Times article today: CTyankee Feb 2013 #17
Good. Government should stay out of our sex lives. Zax2me Feb 2013 #11
when they start paying taxes then they can have a say in the rules nt msongs Feb 2013 #12
Hobby Lobby hamsterjill Feb 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Religious groups win figh...»Reply #5