Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"I知 not anti-gun, I知 pro-kindergartner" [View all]
12 rational responses to irrational gun argumentsWith the gun control debate hitting a fever pitch, a handy how-to guide for dealing with gun rights extremists
By Richard (RJ) Eskow, Alternet
This article originally appeared on AlterNet.
snip//
Now that President Obama has made his initial gun control proposals, the crazys being ratcheted up to a new level. Rational Americans in all walks of life will be confronted with these kinds of arguments. Were going to need a playbook. Here are 12 responses you can use when youre confronted with some of the standard illogical, irrational and emotionally overheated statements that gun extremists use.
1. Im not anti-gun, Im pro-kindergartner.
After Newtown, what person in his right mind thinks its irrational to propose some common-sense measures to prevent similar tragedies in the future?
After Newtown, what person in his right mind thinks its irrational to propose some common-sense measures to prevent similar tragedies in the future?
snip//
3. If dead children are a distraction, what subjects are important enough to be worthy of your attention?
As Media Matters reports, an increasing number of gun-extremist righties have suggested that attempts to prevent more deaths, including the deaths of young people at Newtown, Aurora, Columbine and elsewhere, are really just a distraction from more important matters.
Try convincing the parents of dead kids that their personal tragedies arent important. And if dead kindergartners dont deserve your attention, what does?
As Media Matters reports, an increasing number of gun-extremist righties have suggested that attempts to prevent more deaths, including the deaths of young people at Newtown, Aurora, Columbine and elsewhere, are really just a distraction from more important matters.
Try convincing the parents of dead kids that their personal tragedies arent important. And if dead kindergartners dont deserve your attention, what does?
more...
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/12_rational_responses_to_irrational_gun_arguments/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
30 replies, 4387 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (36)
ReplyReply to this post
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
conservative writers, ... are calling the unfolding gun debate a "distraction" and a "red herring"
Kolesar
Jan 2013
#1
No, it's a good sound bite. There are obviously a lot of Americans who are willing to let ....
Scuba
Jan 2013
#4
I totally disagree. Anyone who claims that doesn't understand the minds of gun owners....
Honeycombe8
Jan 2013
#12
Neither do you. My opinion is....it's a bad slogan that wouldn't convince anyone
Honeycombe8
Jan 2013
#16
Sorry, gun culture's ownership, accumulation of, promotion of guns is significantly responsible .
Hoyt
Jan 2013
#27
"We aren't anti-choice. We are pro-life!" Same slogan. It doesn't convince anyone but the base who
Honeycombe8
Jan 2013
#13