Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 01:24 PM Jan 2013

Who’s your daddy? A list of political recipients of the NRA’s cash [View all]

http://hot-dogma.com/2013/01/17/whos-your-daddy-a-list-of-political-recipients-of-the-nras-cash/

which links to here:

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000082



The National Rifle Association goes to great lengths (and spends a huge sum of money) to defend the right to bear arms. It is opposed to virtually every form of gun control, including restrictions on owning assault weapons, background checks for gun owners, and registration of firearms.

NRA’s influence is felt not only through campaign contributions, but through millions of dollars in off-the-books spending on issue ads and the like. Following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the NRA supported proposals to arm airline pilots with guns. Between 2001 and 2010, the NRA spent between $1.5 million and $2.7 million on federal-level lobbying efforts. During the 2010 election cycle, the NRA spent more than $7.2 million on independent expenditures at the federal level -- messages that advocate for or against political candidates. These messages primarily supported Republican candidates or opposed Democratic candidates.

(Stats at the link.)
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And I want Mike Bloomberg and others to finance 1 dollar more in 2014 to all ANTI-GUN candidates graham4anything Jan 2013 #1
Please don't bring up Bloomberg until you "get" that "stop and frisk" is unConstitutional Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #3
Did you google the 100s of millions in charity the private person gives to ONLY liberal causes? graham4anything Jan 2013 #5
OWS is a populist social movement in response to critical social issues which are as yet Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #7
they were on private property. Would you want 500 people living in your garden? graham4anything Jan 2013 #9
That's all you've got? It's "privately-owned" public property, and Bloomberg's girlfriend Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #13
They overstayed their welcome. Protests should be in, out, in out, in out. Not lifetime lease graham4anything Jan 2013 #14
Madoff robbed the 1%, that's why he's in jail. Iceland jailed all the corrupt banksters. Us? None. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #15
as 60s protesters have said, building from within instead of anonymously works better graham4anything Jan 2013 #17
On why no one at HSBC is behind bars Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #8
Giving to charity does not excuse one of being an authoritarian asshole. N/T beevul Jan 2013 #16
And if you use the filters Lurks Often Jan 2013 #2
That list must include candidate from 2012 as well as members liberal N proud Jan 2013 #4
Actually, those are such piddling amounts ... frazzled Jan 2013 #6
that is what Mike Bloomberg, private citizen is doing with his personal money in 2014 graham4anything Jan 2013 #10
Legally Bloomberg can only give $2500 to a candidate. former9thward Jan 2013 #11
His specially organized super Pac devoted to this cause is giving the money.Scotus ruled that legal graham4anything Jan 2013 #12
you have to click around a little at that open secrets site farminator3000 Jan 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who’s your daddy? A list ...